Hard Cash and War in Orbit: Navigating the Paradoxes of Digital Finance and the Militarisation of Space

Why in News?

Two significant and seemingly distinct developments have recently come to the forefront, highlighting critical paradoxes in India’s digital transformation and the emerging challenges in global security:

1. The Persistence of Cash in a Digital India: India’s digital payment revolution has produced a remarkable transformation: millions can now transfer money instantly with a phone, often without handling currency at all. Yet the country is not becoming a cashless economy. The more interesting reality is that cash is acquiring a different purpose. The Reserve Bank of India has printed about 176 billion banknotes in circulation and continues to print billions of new notes every year, even as Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions approach a billion a day. The article argues that digital payments are replacing cash primarily as a mechanism for everyday exchange, but they are not replacing all the reasons people want to possess money in physical form.

2. The Militarisation of Space: The United States has acknowledged a development that could prove more consequential than the identity of the weapon involved: it has deployed a weapon in orbit. Washington has offered few details, but the announcement signals that the militarisation of space has entered a more explicit and dangerous phase. For decades, satellites were the invisible infrastructure behind modern warfare. Now, they are increasingly becoming both the instruments of war and potential targets. The article argues that this ambiguity is perhaps the most worrying feature of the new competition. Technologies developed for peaceful purposes can acquire military applications, while ostensibly defensive systems can look offensive to an adversary.

Introduction

India stands at the crossroads of a digital revolution and a fragile global security environment. The rapid adoption of digital payments has transformed the way Indians transact, but the persistence of cash reveals a deeper truth about the nature of money, trust, and resilience. At the same time, the deployment of weapons in orbit by the United States marks a dangerous new phase in the militarisation of space, with profound implications for global stability and the future of warfare.

This article analyses both developments, their key issues, challenges, and the way forward.

Background

Part 1: Hard Cash – The Persistence of Physical Currency in a Digital India

India’s digital payment revolution has produced a remarkable transformation: millions can now transfer money instantly with a phone, often without handling currency at all. Yet the country is not becoming a cashless economy. The more interesting reality is that cash is acquiring a different purpose. The Reserve Bank of India has printed about 176 billion banknotes in circulation and continues to print billions of new notes every year. This is happening even as Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions approach a billion a day. The contradiction is apparent. Digital payments are replacing cash primarily as a mechanism for everyday exchange. They are not replacing all the reasons people want to possess money in physical form.

Why Cash Persists
For many Indians, cash remains a reserve against uncertainty. A power cut, network failure, cyberattack or malfunctioning payment system can instantly turn a digital balance into something temporarily inaccessible. Cash does not require a smartphone, password, battery or internet connection. Its usefulness therefore increases, rather than disappears, when dependence on digital infrastructure becomes pervasive.

There is a broader social dimension. The elderly, poorer households, small traders and people in areas with unreliable connectivity cannot always be expected to participate in an economy designed entirely around smartphones and bank accounts. Cash also offers a degree of privacy that electronic transactions inherently reduce. A society that digitises every payment must recognise that convenience and surveillance can sometimes travel together.

But India’s cash dependence has a darker side. A substantial informal economy continues to operate outside complete financial visibility. Property transactions provide a familiar example, where differences between official valuations and actual market prices can create incentives for cash settlements. The lesson of demonetisation in 2016 was instructive: destroying the existing stock of currency cannot by itself eliminate the economic incentives that generate unrecorded transactions. Black money is not simply a pile of notes waiting to be confiscated; it is also a system of behaviour. This distinction matters for policy. India should continue expanding digital payments because they improve efficiency, transparency and financial inclusion. But it would be a mistake to interpret rising UPI usage as justification for dismantling the country’s cash infrastructure. The RBI still needs printing presses, currency distribution networks, ATMs and adequate reserves of notes.

Digital Infrastructure as Complementary
There is also an important institutional lesson. Digital infrastructure should be treated as complementary to monetary infrastructure, not as its replacement. The resilience of an economy depends partly on having alternatives when its dominant systems fail. UPI has changed the way Indians pay. It has not changed the deeper human instinct to keep something tangible aside for uncertain times. Cash may become less important at the point of purchase while becoming more important as a private reserve. The ultimate test of India’s digital transformation, therefore, is not whether cash disappears. It is whether citizens can choose between digital and physical money without either system becoming a source of vulnerability. A mature payments economy should offer both efficiency in normal times and resilience when normality breaks down.

Part 2: War in Orbit – The Militarisation of Space

The United States has acknowledged a development that could prove more consequential than the identity of the weapon involved: it has deployed a weapon in orbit. Washington has offered few details, but the announcement signals that the militarisation of space has entered a more explicit and dangerous phase. For decades, satellites were the invisible infrastructure behind modern warfare. They enabled secure communications, navigation, intelligence gathering, missile warning and precision targeting. Space was therefore indispensable to military power, but largely as a supporting theatre. The emerging reality is different. Satellites are increasingly becoming both the instruments of war and potential targets.

The Ambiguity of Space Weapons
The distinction matters because space warfare does not necessarily begin with explosions. An electronic-warfare satellite capable of jamming communications could disable an adversary without destroying anything. A spacecraft capable of approaching, grappling or manoeuvring another satellite could potentially perform legitimate maintenance or remove debris – or interfere with an enemy’s systems. More destructive anti-satellite weapons could physically destroy spacecraft, producing debris that remains a threat long after the conflict that created it has ended.

This ambiguity is perhaps the most worrying feature of the new competition. Technologies developed for peaceful purposes can acquire military applications, while ostensibly defensive systems can look offensive to an adversary. A satellite designed to inspect another spacecraft may be regarded in peacetime as useful infrastructure and in wartime as a hunter-killer. The strategic incentives are particularly strong for Russia and China. Neither needs to reproduce America’s enormous space architecture to threaten American military effectiveness. America is exceptionally dependent on satellites, making them an attractive vulnerability. Russia has invested in anti-satellite missiles, while China has demonstrated increasingly sophisticated abilities to manoeuvre spacecraft close to other satellites. The objective for a weaker space power can therefore be not to dominate orbit but to make the opponent’s dominance too costly to exploit. That creates a classic security dilemma.

The Security Dilemma
Washington deploys an orbital weapon to protect its satellites; Moscow and Beijing see another instrument of American military power and develop countermeasures; Washington then responds with more sophisticated capabilities. Each side can describe its actions as deterrence while making conflict more likely. There is an additional danger unique to space. Destroying a satellite does not confine the consequences to the intended target. Debris can travel through valuable orbital pathways and threaten civilian, commercial and scientific spacecraft belonging to countries that have nothing to do with the conflict. Modern economies increasingly rely on space infrastructure for communications, finance, navigation, weather forecasting and logistics.

A major space conflict could therefore become an economic crisis on Earth. The immediate question may be what weapon America has put into orbit. The larger question is whether the world’s major powers are prepared for the consequences of making space a contested military domain. Space is becoming too important to leave governed principally by military calculations. The next arms race may not be about putting more weapons on Earth. It may be about deciding who can control what happens above it.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Persistence of Cash as a Reserve Against Uncertainty

The article highlights that cash remains a reserve against uncertainty. A power cut, network failure, cyberattack or malfunctioning payment system can instantly turn a digital balance into something temporarily inaccessible. Cash does not require a smartphone, password, battery or internet connection. Its usefulness therefore increases, rather than disappears, when dependence on digital infrastructure becomes pervasive.

2. The Social Dimension of Cash

The article notes that the elderly, poorer households, small traders and people in areas with unreliable connectivity cannot always be expected to participate in an economy designed entirely around smartphones and bank accounts. Cash also offers a degree of privacy that electronic transactions inherently reduce.

3. The Darker Side of Cash Dependence

The article acknowledges that India’s cash dependence has a darker side. A substantial informal economy continues to operate outside complete financial visibility. The lesson of demonetisation in 2016 was instructive: destroying the existing stock of currency cannot by itself eliminate the economic incentives that generate unrecorded transactions. Black money is not simply a pile of notes waiting to be confiscated; it is also a system of behaviour.

4. Digital Infrastructure as Complementary

The article argues that digital infrastructure should be treated as complementary to monetary infrastructure, not as its replacement. The resilience of an economy depends partly on having alternatives when its dominant systems fail. The RBI still needs printing presses, currency distribution networks, ATMs and adequate reserves of notes.

5. The Militarisation of Space

The article highlights that the militarisation of space has entered a more explicit and dangerous phase. Satellites are increasingly becoming both the instruments of war and potential targets. The distinction matters because space warfare does not necessarily begin with explosions.

6. The Ambiguity of Space Weapons

The article notes that the ambiguity of space weapons is perhaps the most worrying feature of the new competition. Technologies developed for peaceful purposes can acquire military applications, while ostensibly defensive systems can look offensive to an adversary.

7. The Security Dilemma

The article argues that the security dilemma in space is a major challenge. Washington deploys an orbital weapon to protect its satellites; Moscow and Beijing see another instrument of American military power and develop countermeasures; Washington then responds with more sophisticated capabilities. Each side can describe its actions as deterrence while making conflict more likely.

Timeline of Events

• 2016: Demonetisation in India.

• Recent: RBI has about 176 billion banknotes in circulation.

• Recent: UPI transactions approach a billion a day.

• Recent: US acknowledges deployment of a weapon in orbit.

• Recent: Russia invests in anti-satellite missiles.

• Recent: China demonstrates abilities to manoeuvre spacecraft close to other satellites.

Government Response

• Cash: The RBI continues to print billions of new notes every year. The government is expanding digital payments through UPI.

• Space: The US has acknowledged the deployment of a weapon in orbit. Washington has offered few details. The government has not announced any specific policy response.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to cash or space militarisation.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Cash:

  • Article 21: Right to Life, which includes the right to a decent standard of living.

  • Financial Inclusion: The government has a responsibility to ensure financial inclusion for all.

  • Privacy: Cash offers a degree of privacy that electronic transactions inherently reduce.

• Space:

  • Article 51: Promotion of international peace and security.

  • Governance: Space is becoming too important to leave governed principally by military calculations.

  • International Cooperation: The article calls for international cooperation to prevent an arms race in space.

Social and Political Significance

• Cash:

  • Digital Divide: The elderly, poorer households, small traders and people in areas with unreliable connectivity cannot always be expected to participate in an economy designed entirely around smartphones and bank accounts.

  • Privacy: Cash offers a degree of privacy that electronic transactions inherently reduce.

  • Resilience: Cash provides a reserve against uncertainty.

• Space:

  • Global Security: The militarisation of space is a threat to global security.

  • Economic Crisis: A major space conflict could become an economic crisis on Earth.

  • International Cooperation: The article calls for international cooperation to prevent an arms race in space.

Challenges

• Cash:

  1. Digital Divide: The elderly, poorer households, and people in areas with unreliable connectivity are excluded from digital payments.

  2. Privacy: Electronic transactions reduce privacy.

  3. Resilience: Digital infrastructure is vulnerable to power cuts, network failures, and cyberattacks.

  4. Informal Economy: Cash facilitates the informal economy and black money.

• Space:

  1. Security Dilemma: The security dilemma in space makes conflict more likely.

  2. Ambiguity: The ambiguity of space weapons makes it difficult to distinguish between peaceful and military applications.

  3. Debris: Destroying a satellite creates debris that threatens other spacecraft.

  4. Lack of Governance: Space is becoming too important to leave governed principally by military calculations.

Way Forward

• Cash:

  1. Complementary Infrastructure: Treat digital infrastructure as complementary to monetary infrastructure, not as its replacement.

  2. Financial Inclusion: Ensure financial inclusion for all, including the elderly, poorer households, and people in areas with unreliable connectivity.

  3. Privacy: Protect the privacy of citizens in digital transactions.

  4. Resilience: Maintain adequate reserves of notes and a robust cash infrastructure.

• Space:

  1. International Cooperation: Work with other countries to prevent an arms race in space.

  2. Arms Control: Negotiate arms control agreements for space.

  3. Transparency: Promote transparency in space activities.

  4. Governance: Develop a governance framework for space that is not dominated by military calculations.

Conclusion

The two issues discussed—the persistence of cash in a digital India and the militarisation of space—are distinct but interconnected. Both highlight the paradoxes and challenges of modernity. The digital revolution has transformed the way we transact, but it has not eliminated the need for cash. The militarisation of space has transformed the nature of warfare, but it has not eliminated the need for international cooperation.

The way forward requires a nuanced understanding of both issues. For cash, it requires treating digital infrastructure as complementary to monetary infrastructure, not as its replacement. For space, it requires international cooperation to prevent an arms race and to develop a governance framework that is not dominated by military calculations.

The time for action is now. The future of India’s digital economy and the future of global security depend on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “India’s digital payment revolution has produced a remarkable transformation, yet the country is not becoming a cashless economy.” Discuss this statement in the context of the persistence of cash in India.
Answer: The statement is accurate. India’s digital payment revolution has produced a remarkable transformation: millions can now transfer money instantly with a phone, often without handling currency at all. Yet the country is not becoming a cashless economy. The more interesting reality is that cash is acquiring a different purpose.
Why Cash Persists:

1. Reserve Against Uncertainty: A power cut, network failure, cyberattack or malfunctioning payment system can instantly turn a digital balance into something temporarily inaccessible. Cash does not require a smartphone, password, battery or internet connection.

2. Social Dimension: The elderly, poorer households, small traders and people in areas with unreliable connectivity cannot always be expected to participate in an economy designed entirely around smartphones and bank accounts.

3. Privacy: Cash offers a degree of privacy that electronic transactions inherently reduce.

4. Informal Economy: A substantial informal economy continues to operate outside complete financial visibility.
   The way forward requires treating digital infrastructure as complementary to monetary infrastructure, not as its replacement. The RBI still needs printing presses, currency distribution networks, ATMs and adequate reserves of notes.

Q2. Discuss the lessons from demonetisation in 2016 for India’s digital payments policy. How can India balance the push for digital payments with the need for cash resilience?
Answer: The lesson of demonetisation in 2016 was instructive: destroying the existing stock of currency cannot by itself eliminate the economic incentives that generate unrecorded transactions. Black money is not simply a pile of notes waiting to be confiscated; it is also a system of behaviour. This distinction matters for policy.
Balancing Digital Payments with Cash Resilience:

1. Complementary Infrastructure: Treat digital infrastructure as complementary to monetary infrastructure, not as its replacement.

2. Financial Inclusion: Ensure financial inclusion for all, including the elderly, poorer households, and people in areas with unreliable connectivity.

3. Privacy: Protect the privacy of citizens in digital transactions.

4. Resilience: Maintain adequate reserves of notes and a robust cash infrastructure.

5. Efficiency and Resilience: A mature payments economy should offer both efficiency in normal times and resilience when normality breaks down.

Q3. “The militarisation of space has entered a more explicit and dangerous phase.” Discuss this statement in the context of the US deployment of a weapon in orbit.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The US has acknowledged a development that could prove more consequential than the identity of the weapon involved: it has deployed a weapon in orbit. Washington has offered few details, but the announcement signals that the militarisation of space has entered a more explicit and dangerous phase.
Key Issues:

1. Ambiguity: Technologies developed for peaceful purposes can acquire military applications, while ostensibly defensive systems can look offensive to an adversary.

2. Security Dilemma: Washington deploys an orbital weapon to protect its satellites; Moscow and Beijing see another instrument of American military power and develop countermeasures; Washington then responds with more sophisticated capabilities. Each side can describe its actions as deterrence while making conflict more likely.

3. Debris: Destroying a satellite creates debris that threatens other spacecraft.

4. Economic Crisis: A major space conflict could become an economic crisis on Earth.
   The way forward requires international cooperation to prevent an arms race in space and to develop a governance framework that is not dominated by military calculations.

Q4. What are the key challenges in preventing an arms race in space? Suggest measures to address these challenges.
Answer: The key challenges in preventing an arms race in space are:

1. Security Dilemma: The security dilemma in space makes conflict more likely.

2. Ambiguity: The ambiguity of space weapons makes it difficult to distinguish between peaceful and military applications.

3. Lack of Governance: Space is becoming too important to leave governed principally by military calculations.

4. Lack of Trust: There is a lack of trust between major powers.
   Measures to address these challenges:

5. International Cooperation: Work with other countries to prevent an arms race in space.

6. Arms Control: Negotiate arms control agreements for space.

7. Transparency: Promote transparency in space activities.

8. Governance: Develop a governance framework for space that is not dominated by military calculations.

9. Confidence-Building Measures: Implement confidence-building measures to reduce tensions.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to address the dual challenges of digital finance and space security.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy to address the dual challenges must include:

1. Digital Finance:

   • Complementary Infrastructure: Treat digital infrastructure as complementary to monetary infrastructure, not as its replacement.

   • Financial Inclusion: Ensure financial inclusion for all, including the elderly, poorer households, and people in areas with unreliable connectivity.

   • Privacy: Protect the privacy of citizens in digital transactions.

   • Resilience: Maintain adequate reserves of notes and a robust cash infrastructure.

2. Space Security:

   • International Cooperation: Work with other countries to prevent an arms race in space.

   • Arms Control: Negotiate arms control agreements for space.

   • Transparency: Promote transparency in space activities.

   • Governance: Develop a governance framework for space that is not dominated by military calculations.
     The time for action is now. The future of India’s digital economy and the future of global security depend on the choices made today.

Cyber Resilience and the Peril of Legacy Tech: Lessons for India from Indonesia’s Wake-Up Call

Why in News?

A recent article highlights a critical and often overlooked dimension of cybersecurity: the vulnerability of legacy technology. Security researchers at the United States cybersecurity firm Cifr disclosed that, using artificial intelligence tools, its team had built a worm capable of hijacking WeChat accounts. The researchers estimated that if it had been released rather than responsibly disclosed, it could have reached hundreds of millions of devices within hours. The demonstration matters enormously because it shows what the threat environment now looks like: A small team, working with commercially available AI tools, identified a critical vulnerability in one of the world’s most widely used applications in roughly two days. The complete, self-spreading weapon was ready within a week.

This revelation comes in the wake of Indonesia’s massive cyberattack in June 2024, where the Brain Cipher ransomware variant struck the Temporary National Data Centre (PDNS), disrupting over 200 public services. The article argues that cyber resilience requires fixing old tech, a lesson that is highly relevant for India as it accelerates its digital transformation.

Introduction

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has fundamentally altered the cyber threat landscape. The speed at which vulnerabilities can be discovered and exploited has accelerated dramatically. The Cifr demonstration is a stark reminder that the window between vulnerability discovery and exploitation has collapsed from roughly 63 days to just five days. For systems that are “end-of-life,” unsupported, or simply unrecorded in any asset register, five days is irrelevant because no patch is coming.

Indonesia’s experience with the Brain Cipher ransomware attack serves as a cautionary tale. The attack, which disrupted over 200 public services including immigration processing and airport operations, was made possible by the exploitation of legacy technology. The ransom demand was $8 million. The Indonesian government declined to pay, but the recovery took weeks. This incident underscores the urgent need for nations to prioritize cyber resilience by addressing the vulnerabilities inherent in their legacy technology infrastructure.

Background

The Cifr Demonstration: AI-Powered Cyber Threats

Security researchers at the United States cybersecurity firm Cifr disclosed that, using artificial intelligence tools, its team had built a worm capable of hijacking WeChat accounts. The researchers did not need to answer the phone or tap their screen. Rather, simply receiving a call was enough. They named it WeWorm and estimated that if it had been released rather than responsibly disclosed, it could have reached hundreds of millions of devices within hours. WeWorm was a proof of concept. Tencent patched the underlying flaw, and there is no evidence that real users were harmed. But the demonstration matters enormously because it shows what the threat environment now looks like: A small team, working with commercially available AI tools, identified a critical vulnerability in one of the world’s most widely used applications in roughly two days. The complete, self-spreading weapon was ready within a week.

The speed matters as much as the technique. Not long ago, the typical window between a vulnerability being discovered and an attacker exploiting it was around 63 days. That window has now collapsed to roughly five days. Defenders who once had weeks to patch a system now have days. For a system that is modern, supported and actively maintained, five days is painful but survivable. For a system that is end-of-life, unsupported or simply unrecorded in any asset register, five days is irrelevant because no patch is coming.

The Legacy Technology Problem

As systems modern, supported and actively maintained, five days is painful but survivable. For a system that is end-of-life, unsupported or simply unrecorded in any asset register, five days is irrelevant because no patch is coming. Research by US cybersecurity threat intelligence firm Cisco Talos shows that around 40 per cent of the most actively exploited vulnerabilities in recent periods sit on exactly these kinds of end-of-life devices. This is the legacy technology problem.

At its core, legacy technologies are outdated computer systems, including hardware, that are no longer actively supported or updated by their vendors. Once support ends, security vulnerabilities accumulate and go unpatched, leaving systems exposed to threats their designers never anticipated. More than ageing desktop computers, these include the complex network infrastructure that fuels our very way of communication and daily life. Given the rapid advancement of AI and its incorporation into offensive cyber capabilities, hacking groups can now identify and exploit those vulnerabilities faster than ever before.

A July 2026 report from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, titled “Past its use-by-date: Turning end-of-life technology risk into national advantage,” highlighted this problem in Australia’s critical infrastructure. Indonesia faces the same challenge and has already lived through the region’s most consequential demonstration. In June 2024, the Brain Cipher ransomware variant struck the Temporary National Data Centre (PDNS), disrupting over 200 public services including immigration processing and airport operations. The ransom demand was $8 million. Rightfully, the government declined to pay. However, recovery took weeks.

The Indian Context

India is in the midst of an ambitious digital transformation. From Aadhaar to UPI, from DigiLocker to the National Digital Health Mission, digital infrastructure has become the backbone of governance and service delivery. However, this rapid digitisation has also created a sprawling and often unmanaged asset base. Many government departments and critical infrastructure providers continue to rely on legacy systems that are no longer supported by their vendors. These systems are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks.

The Cifr demonstration and the Indonesian experience should serve as a wake-up call for India. The country needs to prioritize cyber resilience by addressing the vulnerabilities inherent in its legacy technology infrastructure. This requires a comprehensive strategy that includes:

1. Asset Mapping: Creating a comprehensive inventory of all hardware and software assets, including legacy systems.

2. Risk Assessment: Conducting regular risk assessments to identify vulnerabilities in legacy systems.

3. Modernisation: Upgrading or replacing legacy systems with modern, supported technologies.

4. Patching: Ensuring that all systems are regularly patched and updated.

5. Capacity Building: Training cybersecurity professionals to identify and respond to threats.

6. Public-Private Partnership: Collaborating with the private sector to share threat intelligence and best practices.

7. International Cooperation: Working with other countries to combat cyber threats.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Acceleration of Cyber Threats Due to AI

The Cifr demonstration highlights how AI is accelerating the pace of cyber threats. The ability to identify a critical vulnerability in two days and build a self-spreading weapon in a week is a game-changer. The window between vulnerability discovery and exploitation has collapsed from 63 days to five days. This means that defenders have very little time to react.

2. The Vulnerability of Legacy Technology

The article argues that legacy technology is a major vulnerability. Around 40% of the most actively exploited vulnerabilities sit on end-of-life devices. Once support ends, security vulnerabilities accumulate and go unpatched, leaving systems exposed to threats their designers never anticipated. Legacy technology includes not just ageing desktop computers but also complex network infrastructure.

3. The Indonesian Experience

The Brain Cipher ransomware attack on Indonesia’s Temporary National Data Centre (PDNS) in June 2024 is a stark reminder of the consequences of failing to address legacy technology risks. The attack disrupted over 200 public services, including immigration processing and airport operations. The ransom demand was $8 million. The recovery took weeks.

4. The Indian Context

India’s rapid digital transformation has created a sprawling and often unmanaged asset base. Many government departments and critical infrastructure providers continue to rely on legacy systems that are no longer supported by their vendors. These systems are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks. The article argues that India needs to prioritize cyber resilience by addressing the vulnerabilities inherent in its legacy technology infrastructure.

5. The Need for a Comprehensive Strategy

The article calls for a comprehensive strategy to address the legacy technology problem. This includes asset mapping, risk assessment, modernisation, patching, capacity building, public-private partnership, and international cooperation.

Timeline of Events

• June 2024: Brain Cipher ransomware attack on Indonesia’s PDNS, disrupting over 200 public services.

• July 2026: Australian Strategic Policy Institute report “Past its use-by-date: Turning end-of-life technology risk into national advantage” published.

• Recent: Cifr researchers disclose WeWorm, an AI-powered worm capable of hijacking WeChat accounts.

• Recent: Cisco Talos research shows 40% of most actively exploited vulnerabilities sit on end-of-life devices.

Government Response

• Indonesia: The Indonesian government declined to pay the $8 million ransom. The recovery took weeks. The government has since been criticized for its lack of preparedness.

• Australia: The Australian Strategic Policy Institute report highlights the problem of legacy technology in Australia’s critical infrastructure.

• India: The government has launched various initiatives to enhance cybersecurity, including the National Cyber Security Coordinator (NCSC) and the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C). However, the article argues that more needs to be done to address the legacy technology problem.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to cybersecurity or legacy technology.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Article 21 (Right to Life): The right to life includes the right to a secure digital environment. The government has a constitutional obligation to protect citizens from cyber threats.

• Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP): Article 38 directs the state to promote the welfare of the people. Cyber resilience is essential for the welfare of the people.

• Governance: The article highlights the need for better governance of digital infrastructure, including asset management, risk assessment, and modernisation.

• Federalism: Cybersecurity is a cross-cutting issue that requires coordination between the center and states.

Social and Political Significance

• Digital Economy: Cyberattacks can disrupt the digital economy, affecting businesses, consumers, and government services.

• National Security: Cyberattacks can compromise national security, affecting critical infrastructure such as power grids, transportation, and communication networks.

• Public Trust: Cyberattacks can erode public trust in digital services and the government.

• Privacy: Cyberattacks can compromise the privacy of citizens.

Challenges

1. Lack of Asset Mapping: Many organisations do not have a comprehensive inventory of their hardware and software assets.

2. Lack of Risk Assessment: Many organisations do not conduct regular risk assessments.

3. Lack of Modernisation: Many organisations continue to rely on legacy systems that are no longer supported.

4. Lack of Patching: Many organisations do not regularly patch and update their systems.

5. Lack of Capacity: There is a shortage of cybersecurity professionals.

6. Lack of Public-Private Partnership: There is a lack of collaboration between the public and private sectors.

7. Lack of International Cooperation: There is a lack of international cooperation to combat cyber threats.

Way Forward

1. Asset Mapping: Create a comprehensive inventory of all hardware and software assets, including legacy systems.

2. Risk Assessment: Conduct regular risk assessments to identify vulnerabilities in legacy systems.

3. Modernisation: Upgrade or replace legacy systems with modern, supported technologies.

4. Patching: Ensure that all systems are regularly patched and updated.

5. Capacity Building: Train cybersecurity professionals to identify and respond to threats.

6. Public-Private Partnership: Collaborate with the private sector to share threat intelligence and best practices.

7. International Cooperation: Work with other countries to combat cyber threats.

8. Regulatory Framework: Develop a regulatory framework for cybersecurity that mandates minimum standards for legacy technology management.

9. Awareness: Launch awareness campaigns to educate citizens and organisations about cyber threats.

Conclusion

The Cifr demonstration and the Indonesian experience are stark reminders of the urgent need for cyber resilience. The acceleration of cyber threats due to AI and the vulnerability of legacy technology pose a significant risk to national security, the digital economy, and public trust.

India’s rapid digital transformation has created a sprawling and often unmanaged asset base. Many government departments and critical infrastructure providers continue to rely on legacy systems that are no longer supported by their vendors. These systems are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks.

The way forward requires a comprehensive strategy that includes asset mapping, risk assessment, modernisation, patching, capacity building, public-private partnership, and international cooperation. The time for action is now. The future of India’s digital economy and national security depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “Cyber resilience requires fixing old tech.” Discuss this statement in the context of the recent Cifr demonstration and the Indonesian ransomware attack.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The Cifr demonstration showed that a small team, working with commercially available AI tools, could identify a critical vulnerability in two days and build a self-spreading weapon in a week. The window between vulnerability discovery and exploitation has collapsed from 63 days to five days. For a system that is modern, supported and actively maintained, five days is painful but survivable. For a system that is end-of-life, unsupported or simply unrecorded in any asset register, five days is irrelevant because no patch is coming.
The Indonesian ransomware attack on the Temporary National Data Centre (PDNS) in June 2024 is a stark reminder of the consequences of failing to address legacy technology risks. The attack disrupted over 200 public services, including immigration processing and airport operations. The recovery took weeks.
The article argues that around 40% of the most actively exploited vulnerabilities sit on end-of-life devices. This is the legacy technology problem. India needs to prioritize cyber resilience by addressing the vulnerabilities inherent in its legacy technology infrastructure.

Q2. Discuss the impact of Artificial Intelligence on the cyber threat landscape. How can nations build resilience against AI-powered cyberattacks?
Answer: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has fundamentally altered the cyber threat landscape. The Cifr demonstration shows that AI can accelerate the pace of cyber threats. The ability to identify a critical vulnerability in two days and build a self-spreading weapon in a week is a game-changer. The window between vulnerability discovery and exploitation has collapsed from 63 days to five days.
Building Resilience:

1. Asset Mapping: Create a comprehensive inventory of all hardware and software assets, including legacy systems.

2. Risk Assessment: Conduct regular risk assessments to identify vulnerabilities.

3. Modernisation: Upgrade or replace legacy systems with modern, supported technologies.

4. Patching: Ensure that all systems are regularly patched and updated.

5. Capacity Building: Train cybersecurity professionals to identify and respond to threats.

6. Public-Private Partnership: Collaborate with the private sector to share threat intelligence and best practices.

7. International Cooperation: Work with other countries to combat cyber threats.

Q3. What are the key challenges in addressing the legacy technology problem in India? Suggest measures to address these challenges.
Answer: The key challenges in addressing the legacy technology problem in India are:

1. Lack of Asset Mapping: Many organisations do not have a comprehensive inventory of their hardware and software assets.

2. Lack of Risk Assessment: Many organisations do not conduct regular risk assessments.

3. Lack of Modernisation: Many organisations continue to rely on legacy systems that are no longer supported.

4. Lack of Patching: Many organisations do not regularly patch and update their systems.

5. Lack of Capacity: There is a shortage of cybersecurity professionals.

6. Lack of Public-Private Partnership: There is a lack of collaboration between the public and private sectors.
   Measures to address these challenges:

7. Asset Mapping: Create a comprehensive inventory of all hardware and software assets.

8. Risk Assessment: Conduct regular risk assessments.

9. Modernisation: Upgrade or replace legacy systems.

10. Patching: Ensure that all systems are regularly patched and updated.

11. Capacity Building: Train cybersecurity professionals.

12. Public-Private Partnership: Collaborate with the private sector.

13. International Cooperation: Work with other countries.

14. Regulatory Framework: Develop a regulatory framework for cybersecurity.

Q4. “The Indonesian ransomware attack is a cautionary tale for India.” Discuss this statement in the context of India’s digital transformation.
Answer: The statement is accurate. Indonesia’s experience with the Brain Cipher ransomware attack in June 2024 serves as a cautionary tale for India. The attack disrupted over 200 public services, including immigration processing and airport operations. The ransom demand was $8 million. The recovery took weeks.
India is in the midst of an ambitious digital transformation. From Aadhaar to UPI, digital infrastructure has become the backbone of governance and service delivery. However, this rapid digitisation has also created a sprawling and often unmanaged asset base. Many government departments and critical infrastructure providers continue to rely on legacy systems that are no longer supported by their vendors. These systems are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks.
The way forward requires a comprehensive strategy that includes asset mapping, risk assessment, modernisation, patching, capacity building, public-private partnership, and international cooperation.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to build cyber resilience and address the legacy technology problem.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy for India to build cyber resilience and address the legacy technology problem must include:

1. Asset Mapping: Create a comprehensive inventory of all hardware and software assets.

2. Risk Assessment: Conduct regular risk assessments.

3. Modernisation: Upgrade or replace legacy systems.

4. Patching: Ensure that all systems are regularly patched and updated.

5. Capacity Building: Train cybersecurity professionals.

6. Public-Private Partnership: Collaborate with the private sector.

7. International Cooperation: Work with other countries.

8. Regulatory Framework: Develop a regulatory framework for cybersecurity.

9. Awareness: Launch awareness campaigns.

10. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize cyber resilience.
    The time for action is now. The future of India’s digital economy and national security depends on the choices made today.

Another Way to See the World: Decolonising Cartography and the Politics of Representation

Why in News?

In a remarkable vote at the United Nations, the General Assembly has overwhelmingly backed a resolution calling for a more accurate representation of the size of the world’s continents. A total of 164 countries supported the resolution, with the United States voting against it and six countries abstaining. Led by Togo, with the backing of the African Union, the initiative seeks to correct the distortions created by the world map that generations have grown up with. Africa is set to appear much closer to its actual size, while Europe and North America will lose some of the visual prominence they acquire on the familiar Mercator projection. This development marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over the politics of cartography and the decolonisation of knowledge.

Introduction

A map is not just a picture of the world; it is a picture of how we understand the world. That idea has acquired a new significance at the United Nations, where the General Assembly has overwhelmingly backed a resolution calling for a more accurate representation of the size of the world’s continents. The resolution promotes the wider use of equal-area map projections, including the Equal Earth projection, developed in 2018. The purpose is not to declare one map the only correct map, nor does the resolution ban the centuries-old Mercator projection. It encourages the use of projections that preserve the relative area of continents when the purpose is to understand their actual geographical size.

The article by Santhosh Mathew, Professor at the Centre for South Asian Studies, School of International Studies & Social Sciences, Pondicherry University, argues that this is a modest technical change on paper, but it carries a larger symbolic message. The world of the twenty-first century is no longer the world of sixteenth-century ships. Satellites can photograph the Earth, computers can model it in three dimensions, and digital platforms can switch between projections instantly. There is little reason to pretend that a centuries-old projection must serve every modern purpose.

Background

The Mercator Projection: A Navigation Tool Turned Worldview

The Mercator map has a remarkable history. Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator introduced it in 1569 when European ships were venturing across oceans in search of new trade routes and territories. His objective was not to create a map that accurately compared the size of continents. It was to help sailors navigate. By preserving angles and directions, Mercator produced a revolutionary tool for maritime navigation. The map served its original purpose brilliantly.

The difficulty came when a map created for sailors gradually became the most familiar visual representation of the planet. A navigation chart was transformed into a picture through which generations of schoolchildren came to understand the world. The distortion becomes obvious when we compare Greenland with Africa. On a conventional Mercator map, Greenland can appear almost as large as Africa. In reality, Africa is roughly 14 times larger than Greenland. The reason is mathematical. As the spherical Earth is projected onto a flat surface, areas become increasingly enlarged towards the poles. Greenland, located close to the Arctic, is therefore dramatically exaggerated, while Africa, much closer to the Equator, appears considerably smaller than its actual area.

Europe and North America also acquire a greater visual size, while Africa and South America are compressed. The map is not “wrong” in the sense that Mercator failed at his original task. It becomes misleading when people use it to compare the actual geographical size of continents.

The Politics of Cartography

This is where the new UN initiative acquires its political and cultural significance. For the Global South, the problem is not merely that Africa looks smaller on a classroom map. Maps influence the imagination. Children encounter the world first through maps before they learn about population, resources, economic power or political influence. What appears large can unconsciously appear important; what appears small can seem peripheral. A cartographic distortion can therefore become a distortion of perception.

The African argument is that a continent whose geographical reality is immense should not continue to be visually diminished simply because a sixteenth-century navigation system became the standard image of the world. Togo’s initiative, supported by the African Union, reflects a broader effort to challenge inherited systems of representation. The resolution points to the educational, cultural, political, social and economic consequences of distorted cartographic representation.

The history of cartography itself demonstrates the relationship between maps and power. Empires mapped territories they controlled; colonial administrations mapped borders, populations and resources; explorers drew coastlines and trade routes; governments used maps to define political space. A map can tell people not only where a place is, but also how that place fits into a larger world. For much of the modern period, global maps were produced and circulated through institutions dominated by Western powers.

The Equal Earth Projection

The Equal Earth projection represents a different cartographic philosophy. It was designed by Tom Patterson, Bojan Savric and Bernhard Jenny to show continents in a way that preserves their relative areas more accurately. Africa becomes visibly larger, South America gains its appropriate geographical weight and the enormous scale of Asia becomes more apparent. Europe and North America remain exactly where they are; they simply appear in proportions closer to their actual land area.

The new map does not magically produce a distortion-free Earth because no flat projection can do that. It makes a different compromise, one that is more appropriate when the objective is to compare the size of continents rather than to navigate across oceans.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Distortion of the Mercator Projection

The Mercator projection, designed for navigation, distorts the size of landmasses near the poles. This makes Africa appear much smaller than it actually is, and Greenland appear much larger. This distortion has real-world consequences, as it shapes our perception of the world and our place in it. The article argues that the distortion becomes misleading when people use it to compare the actual geographical size of continents.

2. The Politics of Representation

The article highlights that maps are not neutral representations of reality; they are political tools that reflect and reinforce power structures. The history of cartography demonstrates the relationship between maps and power. Empires mapped territories they controlled; colonial administrations mapped borders, populations and resources. For much of the modern period, global maps were produced and circulated through institutions dominated by Western powers. The UN resolution is an attempt to challenge these inherited systems of representation.

3. The Impact on Education and Perception

The article argues that maps influence the imagination. Children encounter the world first through maps before they learn about population, resources, economic power or political influence. What appears large can unconsciously appear important; what appears small can seem peripheral. A cartographic distortion can therefore become a distortion of perception. The resolution points to the educational, cultural, political, social and economic consequences of distorted cartographic representation.

4. The Equal Earth Projection as an Alternative

The Equal Earth projection represents a different cartographic philosophy. It was designed to show continents in a way that preserves their relative areas more accurately. Africa becomes visibly larger, South America gains its appropriate geographical weight and the enormous scale of Asia becomes more apparent. The new map does not magically produce a distortion-free Earth because no flat projection can do that. It makes a different compromise, one that is more appropriate when the objective is to compare the size of continents rather than to navigate across oceans.

5. The US Opposition and the Global South’s Support

The United States, which was the only country to vote against the resolution, strongly criticised the initiative. Washington argued that such a move was unnecessary and questioned the wisdom of the UN spending attention on historical map projections when the world faces wars, economic crises, climate change, migration and other urgent problems. That criticism raises an obvious question: can changing a map really make a difference? The answer depends on what we expect maps to do. If a map is merely a navigational instrument, the issue may seem trivial. If a map is one of the first tools through which billions of people learn about the world, the question becomes much more important.

India’s support for the resolution is significant in this wider Global South context. New Delhi has welcomed the effort to improve cartographic accuracy while emphasising that the objective should not be to impose one particular projection everywhere. Different maps serve different purposes. A navigation chart can use Mercator, while a map intended to teach students about the actual size of continents can use an equal-area projection.

Timeline of Events

• 1569: Gerardus Mercator introduces the Mercator projection.

• 2018: Equal Earth projection developed by Tom Patterson, Bojan Savric and Bernhard Jenny.

• Recent: UN General Assembly adopts resolution calling for a more accurate representation of the size of the world’s continents. 164 countries vote in favour; the US votes against; six countries abstain.

• Recent: India supports the resolution.

Government Response

• India: India supported the resolution. New Delhi has welcomed the effort to improve cartographic accuracy while emphasising that the objective should not be to impose one particular projection everywhere.

• United States: The US voted against the resolution. Washington argued that such a move was unnecessary and questioned the wisdom of the UN spending attention on historical map projections when the world faces wars, economic crises, climate change, migration and other urgent problems.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to cartography or the UN resolution.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Article 51: Promotion of international peace and security.

• Education: The government has a role in determining the curriculum, including the maps used in schools.

• Governance: The resolution reflects the government’s commitment to decolonising knowledge and challenging Eurocentric worldviews.

• Federalism: The resolution is implemented across both central and state government institutions.

Social and Political Significance

• Decolonisation: The shift away from the Mercator map is a step towards decolonizing knowledge and challenging Eurocentric worldviews.

• Global South: The Equal Earth map more accurately depicts the size of Africa and other regions in the Global South.

• Education: The map used in schools shapes the worldview of future generations.

• National Pride: The resolution is a source of national pride for countries in the Global South.

• International Cooperation: The resolution reflects the growing influence of the Global South in international institutions.

Challenges

1. Inherent Trade-offs: No flat map can accurately depict the Earth.

2. Resistance to Change: The Mercator map is widely used and familiar.

3. Political Sensitivity: Changing the map can be seen as a political statement.

4. Lack of Awareness: There is a lack of awareness about the distortions in the Mercator map.

5. Implementation: Implementing the resolution requires changes in educational curricula and government institutions.

Way Forward

1. Adopt the Equal Earth Map: The government should adopt the Equal Earth map in schools and government offices.

2. Educate the Public: The public should be educated about the distortions in the Mercator map.

3. Promote Critical Thinking: Students should be taught to think critically about maps and their political implications.

4. International Cooperation: India should work with other countries to promote the use of accurate map projections.

5. Research: Invest in research on cartography and its impact on perception.

6. Curriculum Reform: Include the history and politics of cartography in school curricula.

Conclusion

The UN resolution on map projections is a modest technical change on paper, but it carries a larger symbolic message. The world of the twenty-first century is no longer the world of sixteenth-century ships. Satellites can photograph the Earth, computers can model it in three dimensions, and digital platforms can switch between projections instantly. There is little reason to pretend that a centuries-old projection must serve every modern purpose.

The resolution is not just about cartography; it is about visibility. It is about correcting a visual imbalance that has been repeated so often that it came to look natural. The UN vote gives that argument an international platform. The way forward requires a fundamental shift in how we think about maps. It requires adopting the Equal Earth map, educating the public, promoting critical thinking, and fostering international cooperation. The time for action is now. The future of our world depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “A map is not just a picture of the world; it is a picture of how we understand the world.” Discuss this statement in the context of the UN’s recent resolution on map projections.
Answer: The statement is accurate. A map is not just a picture of the world; it is a picture of how we understand the world. The UN’s recent resolution on map projections highlights this idea. The resolution, led by Togo with the backing of the African Union, seeks to correct the distortions created by the Mercator projection, which exaggerates the size of landmasses near the poles and diminishes the perceived scale of developing regions in the Global South.
Key Issues:

1. Distortion of Perception: Maps influence the imagination. Children encounter the world first through maps before they learn about population, resources, economic power or political influence. What appears large can unconsciously appear important; what appears small can seem peripheral.

2. Politics of Representation: The history of cartography demonstrates the relationship between maps and power. Empires mapped territories they controlled; colonial administrations mapped borders, populations and resources.

3. Decolonisation: The shift away from the Mercator map is a step towards decolonizing knowledge and challenging Eurocentric worldviews.
   The way forward requires adopting the Equal Earth map, educating the public, and promoting critical thinking.

Q2. Discuss the historical and political significance of the Mercator projection. Why is it criticised by countries in the Global South?
Answer: The Mercator projection was introduced by Gerardus Mercator in 1569 to help sailors navigate. By preserving angles and directions, it was a revolutionary tool for maritime navigation. However, it became the standard image of the world, and its distortions became a problem.
Criticism by the Global South:

1. Exaggeration of Size: The Mercator projection exaggerates the size of landmasses near the poles. Greenland can appear almost as large as Africa, while Africa is roughly 14 times larger than Greenland.

2. Diminishing the Global South: The projection diminishes the perceived scale of developing regions in the Global South, including Africa, South America, and South Asia.

3. Eurocentrism: The Mercator projection is centered on Europe and perpetuates a Eurocentric worldview.

4. Colonial Legacy: The history of cartography demonstrates the relationship between maps and power. For much of the modern period, global maps were produced and circulated through institutions dominated by Western powers.
   The UN resolution is an attempt to challenge these inherited systems of representation.

Q3. What is the Equal Earth projection? How does it differ from the Mercator projection?
Answer: The Equal Earth projection is an equal-area map projection developed in 2018 by Tom Patterson, Bojan Savric and Bernhard Jenny. It represents a different cartographic philosophy.
Differences from the Mercator Projection:

1. Preservation of Area: The Equal Earth projection preserves the relative areas of continents more accurately. Africa becomes visibly larger, South America gains its appropriate geographical weight and the enormous scale of Asia becomes more apparent.

2. Purpose: The Mercator projection was designed for navigation. The Equal Earth projection is designed to compare the size of continents.

3. Distortion: The Mercator projection distorts the size of landmasses near the poles. The Equal Earth projection distorts shapes and distances, with meridians curving gently towards the poles.

4. Philosophy: The Mercator projection is a conformal projection. The Equal Earth projection is an equal-area projection.
   The new map does not magically produce a distortion-free Earth because no flat projection can do that. It makes a different compromise, one that is more appropriate when the objective is to compare the size of continents.

Q4. “The UN resolution on map projections is not just about cartography; it is about visibility.” Critically examine this statement.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The UN resolution on map projections is not just about cartography; it is about visibility. It is about correcting a visual imbalance that has been repeated so often that it came to look natural.
Key Issues:

1. Visibility: The resolution gives the Global South an international platform to challenge inherited systems of representation.

2. Perception: Maps influence the imagination. What appears large can unconsciously appear important; what appears small can seem peripheral.

3. Education: The map used in schools shapes the worldview of future generations.

4. Decolonisation: The shift away from the Mercator map is a step towards decolonizing knowledge and challenging Eurocentric worldviews.

5. Symbolic Message: The resolution carries a larger symbolic message. The world of the twenty-first century is no longer the world of sixteenth-century ships.
   The way forward requires adopting the Equal Earth map, educating the public, and promoting critical thinking.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to promote accurate cartographic representation and decolonise knowledge.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy for India to promote accurate cartographic representation and decolonise knowledge must include:

1. Adopt the Equal Earth Map: The government should adopt the Equal Earth map in schools and government offices.

2. Educate the Public: The public should be educated about the distortions in the Mercator map.

3. Promote Critical Thinking: Students should be taught to think critically about maps and their political implications.

4. International Cooperation: India should work with other countries to promote the use of accurate map projections.

5. Research: Invest in research on cartography and its impact on perception.

6. Curriculum Reform: Include the history and politics of cartography in school curricula.

7. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize accurate cartographic representation.
   The time for action is now. The future of our world depends on the choices made today.

The Crucial Uttar Pradesh Test: Decoding the Cracks in the BJP’s Electoral Hegemony

Why in News?

The political dominance of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which appeared almost unassailable after 2014, is beginning to show cracks. The 2024 general election was an important setback: the party lost its parliamentary majority and had to depend on its allies to form the government. Since then, disillusionment has acquired greater political salience through youth protests, rising prices, unemployment and failures of governance, particularly irregularities in the education and examination systems. The article by Zoya Hasan, Professor Emerita at the Centre for Political Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, argues that Uttar Pradesh (UP) is where this erosion is most clearly tested. The 2027 UP Assembly election will reveal more than the BJP’s ability to recover lost seats; it will show whether the political template that carried the party to power from Lucknow to New Delhi still commands the same electoral force.

Introduction

Uttar Pradesh is not merely India’s most populous State; it is the citadel of BJP power, central to the party’s rise to national prominence. In the 2014 general election, the BJP won 71 of the State’s 80 seats, establishing it as a crucial pillar of its national power. In the 2019 general election, it won 62 seats on its own despite the formidable alliance of the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP). The State’s electoral weight was thus instrumental to its successive parliamentary majorities at the Centre. UP is still the crucible of the BJP’s majoritarian politics and its Hindu-Muslim mobilisation. A weakening of the BJP here would therefore have implications far beyond the State.

The 2024 general election strongly indicates that the BJP had lost ground in UP. Its tally fell from 62 seats in 2019 to 33, while the SP won 37 and the Congress six. The sharpest erosion occurred in Awadh, once the heartland of the Ayodhya temple movement. In 2022, the BJP won 101 of Awadh’s 154 Assembly seats. In 2024, it was leading in only 51 of those Assembly segments – 50 fewer than the number it had won in 2022.

Background

The 2024 Verdict: A Significant Setback

The timing made the 2024 general election result extremely significant. It followed the inauguration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, which was the culmination of a political and cultural project that had animated the BJP and the wider Hindu right for decades. Yet, the inauguration did not produce the electoral impact that might have been expected: most strikingly, the BJP lost the Faizabad seat, which includes Ayodhya itself. It also lost in many constituencies around it. This does not mean that Ayodhya or the majoritarian politics surrounding it has ceased to matter. The consequential point is that it was no longer enough to win elections even in the movement’s heartland. The fact that the erosion was most visible in this region adds to its significance, given the subsequent controversy over donations to the temple. The episode, whose effects are still being felt across the State, showed that even powerful ideological symbols are not beyond questions of integrity.

This matters because the BJP’s political hold in U.P. has rested on a combination of communal mobilisation, a durable electoral base and social coalitions built around the temple campaign. The 2024 general election showed that this alignment could be disrupted. Its longer-term implications will depend on whether that disruption proves temporary or marks a lasting shift in the electorate’s preferences and expectations.

Some of the Prominent Fault Lines

The 2024 result also suggests that voters are becoming less willing to let a single dimension of politics overwhelm all others, especially when claims of economic performance do not match the realities on the ground. U.P. remains among the poorer-performing economies of the north and east – as it has for decades. Its economy has grown, but growth has not fundamentally altered its relative economic position or generated enough productive employment. The gap between the rhetoric of transformation and economic experience on the ground is particularly visible in the State’s industrial clusters. In Kanpur, Firozabad, Bhadohi and Moradabad, exporters have faced serious disruption from the tariff regime of the United States, and the duties raised on Indian goods, with falling orders, shrinking market access and risks to employment, primarily among temporary and contract workers.

The frustration among young voters is strikingly evident in the precarity of employment and recruitment. Many were actively involved in the anti-National Eligibility cum Entrance Test protests earlier in the year. U.P. has seen repeated examination leaks and cancellations. In 2024, the police constable examination, taken by around 48 lakh candidates for 60,244 posts, was cancelled following a paper leak. The Review Officer/Assistant Review Officer examination was similarly cancelled amid allegations of irregularities, where out of a total of 10.76 lakh registered candidates, about 6.8 lakh candidates appeared, competing for just 411 posts. For a generation that invests years in its preparation for scarce government jobs, such failures are not merely administrative lapses. They can mean the loss of money spent on coaching and applications, income and opportunity in a State where government employment remains a highly valued path to economic security.

The Battle Lines are Being Drawn

In these circumstances, the 2027 U.P. election is likely to be more closely contested than those that the BJP has faced in the State in recent years. The party remains the strongest contender, but the 2024 result has opened space for the Opposition and revealed strains at various levels that were barely perceptible in earlier elections. The government is working overtime to address the gap on several fronts, reflected in a slew of measures to promote local entrepreneurship and provide stipends for students in corporate and technical institutions.

It is also set to introduce new schemes for women, such as the Mahila Udyami Credit Yojana, under which around one crore women associated with self-help groups are expected to receive interest-free credit of up to ₹1 lakh in stages. The Opposition, too, sees an opening. Both the SP and the Congress are seeking to strengthen their appeal among younger voters, with their leaders, Akhilesh Yadav and Rahul Gandhi, focusing on student unrest, unemployment and widening caste fault lines, particularly divisions among upper castes and between them and the Other Backward Classes. Convergence between the two parties, as in 2024, could bolster the Opposition’s chances in the 2027 U.P. election.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Erosion of the BJP’s Hegemonic Status

The article argues that the BJP’s political dominance, which appeared almost unassailable after 2014, is beginning to show cracks. The 2024 general election was a significant setback, with the party losing its parliamentary majority and having to depend on allies. This erosion is most visible in Uttar Pradesh, the citadel of BJP power.

2. The Failure of the Ram Temple to Deliver Electoral Dividends

The article highlights that the inauguration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya did not produce the expected electoral impact. The BJP lost the Faizabad seat, which includes Ayodhya, and many constituencies around it. This shows that even powerful ideological symbols are not beyond questions of integrity.

3. The Gap Between Rhetoric and Economic Reality

The article notes that voters are becoming less willing to let a single dimension of politics overwhelm all others, especially when claims of economic performance do not match the realities on the ground. UP remains among the poorer-performing economies of the north and east. The gap between the rhetoric of transformation and economic experience is particularly visible in the State’s industrial clusters.

4. The Crisis of Youth Unemployment and Examination Irregularities

The article highlights the frustration among young voters due to the precarity of employment and recruitment. UP has seen repeated examination leaks and cancellations. For a generation that invests years in its preparation for scarce government jobs, such failures are not merely administrative lapses; they can mean the loss of money, income, and opportunity.

5. The Opposition’s Opportunity

The article argues that the 2024 result has opened space for the Opposition. Both the SP and the Congress are seeking to strengthen their appeal among younger voters, focusing on student unrest, unemployment, and widening caste fault lines. Convergence between the two parties could bolster the Opposition’s chances in the 2027 UP election.

Timeline of Events

• 2014: BJP wins 71 of UP’s 80 seats in the general election.

• 2019: BJP wins 62 seats in UP.

• 2022: BJP wins 101 of Awadh’s 154 Assembly seats.

• 2024: BJP’s tally in UP falls to 33 seats; SP wins 37, Congress six. BJP loses the Faizabad seat (Ayodhya).

• 2024: Police constable examination cancelled following a paper leak.

• 2024: Review Officer/Assistant Review Officer examination cancelled amid allegations of irregularities.

• 2027: UP Assembly election scheduled.

Government Response

The article notes that the government is working overtime to address the gap on several fronts:

1. Promoting Local Entrepreneurship: A slew of measures to promote local entrepreneurship.

2. Providing Stipends: Stipends for students in corporate and technical institutions.

3. New Schemes for Women: The Mahila Udyami Credit Yojana, under which around one crore women associated with self-help groups are expected to receive interest-free credit of up to ₹1 lakh in stages.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to the UP election or the BJP’s hegemony.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Article 21 (Right to Life): The right to life includes the right to a decent standard of living. The failure of governance in UP, particularly in education and employment, is a violation of this right.

• Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP): Article 39(a) directs the state to ensure that men and women equally have the right to an adequate means of livelihood. The lack of employment opportunities in UP is a violation of this principle.

• Federalism: The UP election is a crucial test of the BJP’s hegemony. A weakening of the BJP in UP would have implications far beyond the State.

• Governance: The article highlights the failure of governance in UP, particularly in the education and examination systems.

Social and Political Significance

• Youth Voters: The frustration among young voters is a major political issue in UP.

• Unemployment: The lack of productive employment is a major source of discontent.

• Caste Fault Lines: The widening caste fault lines, particularly divisions among upper castes and between them and the Other Backward Classes, are a major political issue.

• Opposition Unity: The convergence between the SP and the Congress could bolster the Opposition’s chances in the 2027 UP election.

• National Implications: The UP election will determine whether the shift revealed in 2024 becomes more durable. What happens in UP could therefore alter the political balance on which the BJP’s national dominance has rested.

Challenges

1. Economic Discontent: The gap between the rhetoric of transformation and economic experience on the ground.

2. Youth Unemployment: The precarity of employment and recruitment.

3. Examination Irregularities: Repeated examination leaks and cancellations.

4. Caste Fault Lines: Widening divisions among upper castes and between them and the Other Backward Classes.

5. Opposition Unity: The convergence between the SP and the Congress.

6. Erosion of Ideological Symbols: The failure of the Ram temple to deliver electoral dividends.

Way Forward

1. Address Economic Discontent: The government must address the gap between the rhetoric of transformation and economic experience on the ground.

2. Create Jobs: The government must create productive employment opportunities for the youth.

3. Fix Examination Systems: The government must fix the examination systems to ensure transparency and fairness.

4. Bridge Caste Fault Lines: The government must bridge the caste fault lines through inclusive policies.

5. Strengthen Governance: The government must strengthen governance to ensure accountability and transparency.

6. Opposition Strategy: The Opposition must strengthen its appeal among younger voters and bridge caste fault lines.

7. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to address the challenges facing UP.

Conclusion

The 2027 UP Assembly election will be a crucial test of the BJP’s hegemony. The 2024 general election showed that the BJP’s political hold in UP could be disrupted. The longer-term implications will depend on whether that disruption proves temporary or marks a lasting shift in the electorate’s preferences and expectations.

The way forward requires a fundamental shift in the government’s approach to governance. It requires addressing economic discontent, creating jobs, fixing examination systems, bridging caste fault lines, and strengthening governance. The Opposition must also strengthen its appeal among younger voters and bridge caste fault lines.

The time for action is now. The future of UP and the political balance on which the BJP’s national dominance has rested depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “The political dominance of the BJP is beginning to show cracks.” Critically examine this statement in the context of the 2024 general election results in Uttar Pradesh.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The 2024 general election was a significant setback for the BJP. The party lost its parliamentary majority and had to depend on its allies to form the government. In Uttar Pradesh, the BJP’s tally fell from 62 seats in 2019 to 33, while the SP won 37 and the Congress six. The sharpest erosion occurred in Awadh, once the heartland of the Ayodhya temple movement. In 2022, the BJP won 101 of Awadh’s 154 Assembly seats. In 2024, it was leading in only 51 of those Assembly segments – 50 fewer than the number it had won in 2022.
Key Issues:

1. Failure of the Ram Temple: The inauguration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya did not produce the expected electoral impact. The BJP lost the Faizabad seat, which includes Ayodhya.

2. Economic Discontent: Voters are becoming less willing to let a single dimension of politics overwhelm all others, especially when claims of economic performance do not match the realities on the ground.

3. Youth Unemployment: The frustration among young voters is strikingly evident in the precarity of employment and recruitment.

4. Examination Irregularities: UP has seen repeated examination leaks and cancellations.
   The 2027 UP Assembly election will reveal whether the shift revealed in 2024 becomes more durable.

Q2. Discuss the role of the Ram temple in the BJP’s electoral strategy in Uttar Pradesh. Why did it fail to deliver electoral dividends in 2024?
Answer: The Ram temple in Ayodhya was the culmination of a political and cultural project that had animated the BJP and the wider Hindu right for decades. The BJP’s political hold in UP has rested on a combination of communal mobilisation, a durable electoral base and social coalitions built around the temple campaign.
Why it Failed to Deliver Electoral Dividends in 2024:

1. Erosion in the Heartland: The BJP lost the Faizabad seat, which includes Ayodhya, and many constituencies around it.

2. Questions of Integrity: The subsequent controversy over donations to the temple showed that even powerful ideological symbols are not beyond questions of integrity.

3. Economic Discontent: Voters are becoming less willing to let a single dimension of politics overwhelm all others, especially when claims of economic performance do not match the realities on the ground.
   The consequential point is that it was no longer enough to win elections even in the movement’s heartland.

Q3. What are the key fault lines in Uttar Pradesh politics that could impact the 2027 Assembly election?
Answer: The key fault lines in UP politics are:

1. Economic Discontent: UP remains among the poorer-performing economies of the north and east. The gap between the rhetoric of transformation and economic experience on the ground is particularly visible in the State’s industrial clusters.

2. Youth Unemployment: The frustration among young voters is strikingly evident in the precarity of employment and recruitment.

3. Examination Irregularities: UP has seen repeated examination leaks and cancellations. For a generation that invests years in its preparation for scarce government jobs, such failures are not merely administrative lapses.

4. Caste Fault Lines: Widening divisions among upper castes and between them and the Other Backward Classes.

5. Opposition Unity: The convergence between the SP and the Congress could bolster the Opposition’s chances in the 2027 UP election.
   These fault lines could make the 2027 election more closely contested than those that the BJP has faced in the State in recent years.

Q4. “The 2027 UP election will reveal more than the BJP’s ability to recover lost seats.” Discuss this statement.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The 2027 UP election will reveal more than the BJP’s ability to recover lost seats. It will show whether the political template that carried the party to power from Lucknow to New Delhi still commands the same electoral force.
Key Issues:

1. Durability of the Shift: The 2024 result has already shown that this template is no longer invulnerable in UP. The 2027 election will determine whether the shift revealed in 2024 becomes more durable.

2. National Implications: What happens in UP could alter the political balance on which the BJP’s national dominance has rested.

3. Opposition Strength: The election will test the strength of the Opposition, particularly the SP and the Congress.

4. Governance: The election will be a referendum on the BJP’s governance in UP, particularly in education and employment.
   The UP election is a crucial test of the BJP’s hegemony.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for the BJP to address the challenges in Uttar Pradesh and regain its electoral dominance.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy for the BJP to address the challenges in UP and regain its electoral dominance must include:

1. Address Economic Discontent: The government must address the gap between the rhetoric of transformation and economic experience on the ground.

2. Create Jobs: The government must create productive employment opportunities for the youth.

3. Fix Examination Systems: The government must fix the examination systems to ensure transparency and fairness.

4. Bridge Caste Fault Lines: The government must bridge the caste fault lines through inclusive policies.

5. Strengthen Governance: The government must strengthen governance to ensure accountability and transparency.

6. Youth Outreach: The government must reach out to young voters and address their grievances.

7. Women’s Empowerment: The government must continue to empower women through schemes like the Mahila Udyami Credit Yojana.

8. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to address the challenges facing UP.
   The time for action is now. The future of UP and the political balance on which the BJP’s national dominance has rested depends on the choices made today.

A War Room for India: Navigating the Age of Sanctions and Weaponised Interdependence

Why in News?

The next sanctions crisis may begin with a name on a Washington list and end in an Indian kitchen. Between them lie a New York bank, a London insurer, a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, and several Ministries in Delhi. Foreign pressure moves through one system. No single Ministry follows the whole journey. This fragmented response is the central challenge highlighted by Syed Akbaruddin, former Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations, in his recent article. The article argues that India needs a coordinated, whole-of-government approach—a “war room”—to navigate the increasingly complex landscape of international sanctions, which have evolved from simple trade restrictions into a sophisticated web of financial, technological, and maritime controls. The recent sanctions imposed by the United States on Iranian oil and petrochemicals, and the widening of secondary sanctions, have brought this challenge into sharp focus.

Introduction

The era of “weaponised interdependence” is upon us. In this new era, economic sanctions are no longer just about stopping a seller; they are increasingly about tracking the transaction, the bank, the insurer, and the ship. The United States, through mechanisms like the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), has built a sophisticated architecture of financial and trade controls that can reach any entity, anywhere in the world, that touches the US dollar or the US financial system. For India, a rising global power with deep and diverse international economic interests, navigating this landscape is a critical strategic challenge.

The recent sanctions on Iran, Russia, and the widening use of secondary sanctions have exposed India’s vulnerability. As the article notes, an Indian company may need an American bank for payment, a foreign insurer for its ship, and safe passage to deliver cargo through a strait that another state can disrupt. Foreign pressure moves through one system, but India’s response is fragmented across multiple ministries. This article analyses the challenges posed by the age of sanctions, the need for a coordinated response, and the way forward.

Background

The Evolution of Sanctions: From Trade Bans to Financial Warfare

Sanctions have evolved dramatically over the past few decades. In the 1990s, American laws threatened foreign companies with penalties for conduct abroad. Europe responded with a Blocking Statute. When secondary sanctions against Iran returned in 2018, several European companies withdrew despite having legal protection at home. The possible loss of access to American banking and dollar payments was enough to choke off trade that remained legal in Europe.

Sanctions against Russia widened after 2022. Export controls pursued foreign suppliers of chips and machine tools. Oil restrictions reached tankers, insurers, ship managers, and traders. Sanctions increasingly followed the transaction rather than stopping with the seller. On September 16, the U.S. Congress passed a sanctions bill that would authorise the U.S. President to impose tariffs as a form of economic coercion. India exports to the U.S. could face tariffs of up to 100% over India’s purchases of Russian oil. The Indian government is monitoring developments and has said that it will work with the industry to protect India’s trade and economic interests.

The Iranian Chokehold: The Strait of Hormuz

Iran is using a different chokepoint at sea. On August 23, its Persian Gulf Strait Authority published a list of 45 vessels it called non-compliant. They included Disha, chartered by Petronet LNG and managed by the Shipping Corporation of India, and Maha Roos, an Indian-flagged bulk carrier. The authority did not explain the alleged breaches. By September 14, the list had grown to 77. The authority also warned insurers against covering listed ships. Washington has already sanctioned the authority and warned that seeking passage guarantees from it could carry sanctions risks, even without payment.

The Domestic Consequences

Economic coercion ties foreign policy directly to the domestic economy. Its consequences reach households, farmers, and seafarers. No Ministry can see the whole chain on its own. During the current West Asia crisis, the government coordinated Ministries, monitored vessels and supplies, raised LPG production, and found alternative cargoes. It has kept pumps open and kitchens supplied. That coordination should survive the crisis. An Economic Security and Sanctions Office under the Cabinet Secretariat should become India’s permanent war room for economic coercion. It should bring together officials responsible for foreign policy, finance, commerce, energy, shipping, law, and defence, alongside the Reserve Bank of India and market regulators.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Fragmented Response to Sanctions

The article argues that India’s response to sanctions is fragmented across multiple ministries. Foreign pressure moves through one system—diplomacy, law, banking, trade, shipping, and fuel supplies—but no single Ministry follows the whole journey. This fragmentation leads to inefficiencies, delays, and a lack of strategic coherence.

2. The Challenge of Secondary Sanctions

Secondary sanctions are a powerful tool of economic coercion. They tell a foreign business to abandon a targeted transaction or risk losing access to American finance. The article notes that on August 24, the United States widened its threat under Operation Economic Outcast across five Iranian sectors: digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping. On September 14, Washington imposed Iran-related sanctions on Russia’s VTB Bank, which has a Delhi branch. Banks dealing with Iran face sanctions risk, even where a transaction is permitted under Indian law.

3. The Iranian Chokehold at the Strait of Hormuz

Iran is using its control over the Strait of Hormuz as a chokepoint. The Persian Gulf Strait Authority has published a list of non-compliant vessels, including Indian-flagged ships. The authority has also warned insurers against covering listed ships. This creates a direct threat to India’s energy security and trade routes.

4. The Domestic Consequences of Economic Coercion

The article highlights that economic coercion ties foreign policy directly to the domestic economy. Its consequences reach households, farmers, and seafarers. The government’s coordination during the current West Asia crisis—monitoring vessels and supplies, raising LPG production, and finding alternative cargoes—should be institutionalised.

5. The Need for a Permanent War Room

The article calls for the creation of an Economic Security and Sanctions Office under the Cabinet Secretariat. This office should become India’s permanent war room for economic coercion. It should bring together officials responsible for foreign policy, finance, commerce, energy, shipping, law, and defence, alongside the Reserve Bank of India and market regulators.

6. Why India Cannot Follow China’s Stand

The article argues that India cannot simply copy China’s stand. China’s market power, state-directed economy, and leverage over critical supply chains give it more room to resist. India’s financial and commercial ties with the U.S. make adopting Beijing’s approach costly. A legal objection alone offers little comfort if Indian firms still bear the cost. India must protect household energy, seafarers, fertiliser supplies, and lawful trade while preserving ties with the U.S., Russia, Iran, and the Gulf.

Timeline of Events

• 1990s: American laws threatened foreign companies with penalties for conduct abroad. Europe responded with a Blocking Statute.

• 2018: Secondary sanctions against Iran returned; several European companies withdrew.

• 2022: Sanctions against Russia widened after the invasion of Ukraine.

• August 23: Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority publishes a list of 45 non-compliant vessels, including Indian ships.

• August 24: The U.S. widens its threat under Operation Economic Outcast across five Iranian sectors.

• September 14: The list of non-compliant vessels grows to 77. Washington imposes Iran-related sanctions on Russia’s VTB Bank.

• September 16: The U.S. Congress passes a sanctions bill authorising the President to impose tariffs as a form of economic coercion.

Government Response

The Indian government has been monitoring developments and has said that it will work with the industry to protect India’s trade and economic interests. During the current West Asia crisis, the government coordinated Ministries, monitored vessels and supplies, raised LPG production, and found alternative cargoes. It has kept pumps open and kitchens supplied.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to sanctions.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Article 51: Promotion of international peace and security.

• Article 21: Right to Life, which includes the right to a decent standard of living. Sanctions can impact the availability and affordability of essential commodities.

• Governance: The article highlights the need for a coordinated, whole-of-government approach to sanctions.

• Federalism: Sanctions affect both the center and states.

• Economic Sovereignty: The article argues that India must protect its economic sovereignty while navigating the complex landscape of international sanctions.

Social and Political Significance

• Household Impact: Sanctions can impact household budgets, particularly for energy and food.

• Farmers: Sanctions can impact the availability and affordability of fertilisers.

• Seafarers: Sanctions can impact the safety and livelihoods of seafarers.

• National Security: Sanctions can be used as a tool of economic coercion, threatening national security.

• Global Standing: How India navigates sanctions will shape its global standing and its ability to pursue an independent foreign policy.

Challenges

1. Fragmented Response: No single Ministry follows the whole journey of a sanctions-related transaction.

2. Secondary Sanctions: The threat of losing access to American finance is a powerful tool of coercion.

3. Iranian Chokehold: Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz poses a direct threat to India’s energy security.

4. Domestic Consequences: Economic coercion ties foreign policy directly to the domestic economy.

5. Lack of Institutional Mechanism: There is no permanent war room for economic coercion.

6. China’s Stand: India cannot simply copy China’s stand due to its different economic and financial ties.

Way Forward

1. Create an Economic Security and Sanctions Office: Establish a permanent war room under the Cabinet Secretariat.

2. Whole-of-Government Approach: Bring together officials responsible for foreign policy, finance, commerce, energy, shipping, law, and defence.

3. Track Transactions: The office should track where transactions could fail, from payment and insurance to shipping and delivery.

4. Seek Evidence: Seek evidence behind foreign listings, support legitimate requests for removal, negotiate written exemptions and transition periods, and issue clear Indian guidance.

5. Distinguish Legal Prohibitions: Banks should distinguish legal prohibitions from their own commercial caution.

6. Early Warning: Companies should be warned early when a payment route, insurer, or port is at risk.

7. Enhance LPG Storage: India needs more LPG storage, an expanded Indian-controlled tanker fleet, and a stronger Bharat Maritime Insurance Pool.

8. Secure Long-Term Contracts: Secure long-term LNG contracts outside Hormuz.

9. Rupee Settlement: Rupee settlement can preserve lawful trade when sellers accept it, but cannot shield a bank that still needs New York.

10. Strategic Autonomy: India must protect its economic sovereignty while preserving ties with the U.S., Russia, Iran, and the Gulf.

Conclusion

The age of sanctions is upon us. The next sanctions crisis may begin with a name on a Washington list and end in an Indian kitchen. Between them lie a New York bank, a London insurer, a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, and several Ministries in Delhi. Foreign pressure moves through one system. No single Ministry follows the whole journey.

The way forward requires a fundamental shift in India’s approach to sanctions. It requires a coordinated, whole-of-government response. It requires the creation of an Economic Security and Sanctions Office under the Cabinet Secretariat. It requires a permanent war room for economic coercion.

The time for action is now. The future of India’s economic sovereignty and its ability to pursue an independent foreign policy depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “The next sanctions crisis may begin with a name on a Washington list and end in an Indian kitchen.” Discuss this statement in the context of the evolving nature of international sanctions.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The evolving nature of international sanctions means that they are no longer just about stopping a seller; they are increasingly about tracking the transaction, the bank, the insurer, and the ship. The United States, through mechanisms like OFAC, has built a sophisticated architecture of financial and trade controls that can reach any entity, anywhere in the world, that touches the US dollar or the US financial system.
Key Issues:

1. Weaponised Interdependence: An Indian company may need an American bank for payment, a foreign insurer for its ship, and safe passage to deliver cargo through a strait that another state can disrupt.

2. Secondary Sanctions: Secondary sanctions tell a foreign business to abandon a targeted transaction or risk losing access to American finance.

3. Domestic Consequences: Economic coercion ties foreign policy directly to the domestic economy. Its consequences reach households, farmers, and seafarers.

4. Iranian Chokehold: Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz poses a direct threat to India’s energy security.
   The way forward requires a coordinated, whole-of-government response and the creation of an Economic Security and Sanctions Office.

Q2. What are secondary sanctions? How do they impact India’s economic and strategic interests?
Answer: Secondary sanctions are penalties imposed by one country (typically the United States) on entities in third countries that engage in certain transactions with a target country. They tell a foreign business to abandon a targeted transaction or risk losing access to American finance.
Impact on India:

1. Financial Sector: Banks dealing with Iran or Russia face sanctions risk, even where a transaction is permitted under Indian law.

2. Energy Security: Sanctions on Iranian oil and the threat to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz impact India’s energy imports.

3. Trade: The U.S. Congress passed a sanctions bill that would authorise the President to impose tariffs of up to 100% over India’s purchases of Russian oil.

4. Strategic Autonomy: Secondary sanctions pressure India to align its foreign policy with that of the United States, undermining its strategic autonomy.
   The way forward requires a coordinated response and a permanent war room for economic coercion.

Q3. Discuss the significance of the Strait of Hormuz for India’s energy security. How is Iran using it as a chokepoint?
Answer: The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global oil trade and is of immense significance for India’s energy security. A large portion of India’s crude oil and LPG imports pass through this narrow waterway.
Iran’s Use of the Chokepoint:

1. Vessel List: On August 23, Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority published a list of 45 vessels it called non-compliant, including Indian-flagged ships.

2. Insurer Warning: The authority warned insurers against covering listed ships.

3. Sanctions Risk: Washington has warned that seeking passage guarantees from the authority could carry sanctions risks, even without payment.
   This creates a direct threat to India’s energy security and trade routes. India needs to diversify its energy sources and secure long-term contracts outside Hormuz.

Q4. “A coordinated response is essential as sanctions increasingly target entire transactions.” In light of this statement, suggest measures to strengthen India’s institutional response to sanctions.
Answer: A coordinated response is essential as sanctions increasingly target entire transactions. To strengthen India’s institutional response:

1. Create an Economic Security and Sanctions Office: Establish a permanent war room under the Cabinet Secretariat.

2. Whole-of-Government Approach: Bring together officials responsible for foreign policy, finance, commerce, energy, shipping, law, and defence.

3. Track Transactions: The office should track where transactions could fail, from payment and insurance to shipping and delivery.

4. Seek Evidence: Seek evidence behind foreign listings, support legitimate requests for removal, negotiate written exemptions and transition periods, and issue clear Indian guidance.

5. Distinguish Legal Prohibitions: Banks should distinguish legal prohibitions from their own commercial caution.

6. Early Warning: Companies should be warned early when a payment route, insurer, or port is at risk.

7. Enhance Infrastructure: India needs more LPG storage, an expanded Indian-controlled tanker fleet, and a stronger Bharat Maritime Insurance Pool.

8. Rupee Settlement: Rupee settlement can preserve lawful trade when sellers accept it.

9. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize economic security.

Q5. “India cannot simply copy China’s stand.” Discuss this statement in the context of India’s response to U.S. sanctions.
Answer: The statement is accurate. India cannot simply copy China’s stand on U.S. sanctions. China has said that the American measures have no basis in international law or authorisation from the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Earlier in May, Beijing told Chinese businesses not to recognise, enforce or comply with American sanctions against five Chinese refining companies. India also says that it upholds sanctions mandated by the UNSC and does not accept unilateral sanctions.
Why India Cannot Copy China:

1. Market Power: China’s market power, state-directed economy, and leverage over critical supply chains give it more room to resist.

2. Financial Ties: India’s financial and commercial ties with the U.S. make adopting Beijing’s approach costly.

3. Legal Objection: A legal objection alone offers little comfort if Indian firms still bear the cost.
   India’s Approach:
   India must protect household energy, seafarers, fertiliser supplies, and lawful trade while preserving ties with the U.S., Russia, Iran, and the Gulf. Delhi needs the full picture in one room before it acts. The first test of sovereignty happens when Delhi decides. The second comes when that decision meets a New York bank or the Strait of Hormuz. In the age of sanctions, India cannot move those chokepoints. It can, however, make sure that every decision is taken with the whole journey in view.

The MDR Maze and Manipur’s New Front: Navigating Policy Complexity and Ethnic Conflict

Why in News?

Two significant and seemingly distinct developments have recently come to the forefront, highlighting critical challenges in India’s digital economy and its internal security landscape:

1. The MDR Structure on UPI: The Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) charges announced for UPI transactions show how political considerations can dilute economic benefits. In a quest to preempt political attacks, the rate structure announced by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has been made overly complex. From October 15, the new rates will apply only to UPI payments of ₹2,000 or more made at merchants. As such, the charge is limited to only about 2.5% of all UPI transactions, which is a welcome limitation. Yet, within this, the rules have created different gradations, raising doubts among merchants and potentially slowing the adoption of UPI in India.

2. New Fault Lines in Manipur: In the three years since the conflagration of May 2023 hardened into a fault line between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities, Manipur has traversed a slow path towards peace between them. After nearly a year of President’s Rule gave way in February 2026 to a Bharatiya Janata Party-led government under a new Chief Minister, Yumnam Khemchand Singh, attempts to engineer a thaw gathered pace with the everyday violence between the communities abating. Yet, many of those displaced in 2023 remain in relief camps; an RTI reply puts those dead in these camps at over 700, many due to the lack of access to basic health care and adequate nutrition. Now, a new ethnic fault line has emerged between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities, threatening to further destabilise the state.

Introduction

India’s governance challenges are multifaceted, ranging from the intricacies of digital payment regulation to the complexities of ethnic conflict in its northeastern states. The recent announcement of a complex Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) structure for UPI transactions illustrates the tension between economic efficiency and political expediency. While the government seeks to promote digital payments, it is also wary of a political backlash against any perceived “charges” on digital transactions. This has led to a convoluted rate structure that may inadvertently slow down the adoption of UPI.

Simultaneously, the situation in Manipur remains fragile. The primary conflict between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities has been compounded by a new fault line between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities. This new conflict, which began as localised disputes, has spread across the hill districts, resulting in deaths, displacement, and a humanitarian crisis. The state government must act firmly and even-handedly to contain this outbreak of hostilities and ensure the safety and welfare of all civilians.

This article analyses both developments, their key issues, challenges, and the way forward.

Background

Part 1: A Fear of Political Fallout Has Led to an Overly Complex MDR Structure on UPI

The Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) charges announced for UPI transactions show how political considerations can dilute economic benefits. In a quest to preempt political attacks, the rate structure announced by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has been made overly complex. From October 15, the new rates will apply only to UPI payments of ₹2,000 or more made at merchants. As such, the charge is limited to only about 2.5% of all UPI transactions, which is a welcome limitation.

Yet, within this, the rules have created different gradations:

• Small Merchants: UPI payments made at small merchants earning less than ₹1 lakh a month are exempt.

• Essential Sectors: Those made to merchants operating in certain essential sectors will attract a flat MDR charge instead of the 0.4% applicable on other sectors.

• Capital Market Payments: Capital market payments above ₹2,000 will attract a different MDR.

These are clearly designed to keep political backlash in mind. However, they raise some important doubts among merchants and could potentially slow the adoption of UPI in India. For example, the rules are not clear on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold, which is a low limit at today’s prices. Who is monitoring their income? This will either increase the compliance burden on small merchants or involve a new mechanism for real-time transaction-checking that banks will have to develop. In the short run, it will likely result in small merchants simply refusing to accept UPI until greater clarity emerges.

The government has also instructed banks to make sure that merchants do not pass on this charge to customers. But it has not specified how banks are expected to check whether merchants tweak their prices to absorb this additional charge. A back-of-the-envelope calculation based on past trends suggests that the MDR will yield an upper limit of ₹2,400 crore of monthly revenue for the payments ecosystem. The sector-wise flat rates and reduced rates will likely result in a lower amount.

The government has denied any U.S. pressure to bring these rates to favour American credit card companies. Yet, the data suggests that the benefit will largely accrue to private banks and U.S.-owned UPI apps. There is still an argument to be made for the Reserve Bank of India to foot this bill from the vast surpluses it generates every year. Maintaining vital payment infrastructure is surely a good use of these funds. However, if the government persists in implementing this charge, it should certainly simplify the structure. There is still time before its rollout. The Goods and Services Tax experience shows that rate complexity hits small businesses the hardest.

Part 2: New Fault Lines in Manipur

In the three years since the conflagration of May 2023 hardened into a fault line between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities, Manipur has traversed a slow path towards peace between them. After nearly a year of President’s Rule gave way in February 2026 to a Bharatiya Janata Party-led government under a new Chief Minister, Yumnam Khemchand Singh, attempts to engineer a thaw gathered pace with the everyday violence between the communities abating. Yet, many of those displaced in 2023 remain in relief camps; an RTI reply puts those dead in these camps at over 700, many due to the lack of access to basic health care and adequate nutrition.

Even so, there have been tentative and encouraging openings towards rebuilding normality. On September 2, two Kuki-Zo MLAs attended the Assembly session – the first time since legislators from the community began boycotting it following the attacks in Imphal at the start of the ethnic conflict. In doing so they defied a directive from the Kuki-Zo civil society organisation, the Kuki Inpi Manipur, to continue the boycott until there was a concession on the demand for a separate administration. The two MLAs seem to acknowledge that it is time to reopen the political space even if differences persist, and for this, their presence in the Assembly must be welcomed.

Yet, these moves have coincided with a new ethnic fault line in Manipur. Since February, violence between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities – which began as localised disputes – has spread across the hill districts. Till July, at least 15 Kuki-Zo people, 11 Nagas, three security personnel and a truck driver were killed; more have died in the last two months. Houses in Naga and Kuki-Zo villages have been burnt down and the newly displaced have moved into camps. Blockades imposed by partisans of the communities against the other have held up essentials and medicines, with the smaller Kuki-Zo community the worse affected. Health centres in the hills have been left dysfunctional. This echoes the Naga-Kuki violence of the 1990s, now revived by armed groups claiming to act on behalf of their respective communities and resurrecting arguments over who controls the hills and whose customary laws prevail there.

With its tenure ending soon and Assembly elections due next year, the State government must move quickly to contain this outbreak of hostilities. It must work with civil society to lower the rhetoric – reportage from the ground suggests a weariness with the violence across communities – while acting against the armed groups with the help of the security forces. Those imposing blockades must be deterred by the force of law. Criminal law must apply equally across communities in the hills, and the safety and welfare of civilians must be guaranteed irrespective of ethnicity.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Complexity of the MDR Structure

The article highlights that the MDR structure announced by the NPCI is overly complex. The rules have created different gradations for small merchants, essential sectors, and capital market payments. This complexity raises doubts among merchants and could potentially slow the adoption of UPI in India.

2. The Compliance Burden on Small Merchants

The article notes that the rules are not clear on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold. This will either increase the compliance burden on small merchants or involve a new mechanism for real-time transaction-checking that banks will have to develop. In the short run, it will likely result in small merchants simply refusing to accept UPI until greater clarity emerges.

3. The Political Considerations Behind the MDR

The article argues that the MDR structure is designed to keep political backlash in mind. The government has also instructed banks to make sure that merchants do not pass on this charge to customers. But it has not specified how banks are expected to check whether merchants tweak their prices to absorb this additional charge.

4. The New Ethnic Fault Line in Manipur

The article highlights that a new ethnic fault line has emerged in Manipur between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities. Since February, violence between the two communities has spread across the hill districts. Till July, at least 15 Kuki-Zo people, 11 Nagas, three security personnel and a truck driver were killed. Houses have been burnt down and the newly displaced have moved into camps.

5. The Humanitarian Crisis in Manipur

The article notes that many of those displaced in 2023 remain in relief camps; an RTI reply puts those dead in these camps at over 700, many due to the lack of access to basic health care and adequate nutrition. Blockades imposed by partisans of the communities against the other have held up essentials and medicines, with the smaller Kuki-Zo community the worse affected. Health centres in the hills have been left dysfunctional.

6. The Need for Firm, Even-Handed State Action

The article argues that the State government must move quickly to contain this outbreak of hostilities. It must work with civil society to lower the rhetoric while acting against the armed groups with the help of the security forces. Those imposing blockades must be deterred by the force of law. Criminal law must apply equally across communities in the hills, and the safety and welfare of civilians must be guaranteed irrespective of ethnicity.

Timeline of Events

• May 2023: Conflagration hardens into a fault line between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities in Manipur.

• February 2026: President’s Rule gives way to a BJP-led government under Chief Minister Yumnam Khemchand Singh.

• September 2: Two Kuki-Zo MLAs attend the Assembly session for the first time since the conflict began.

• Since February: Violence between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities spreads across the hill districts.

• Till July: At least 15 Kuki-Zo people, 11 Nagas, three security personnel and a truck driver were killed.

• October 15: New MDR rates for UPI transactions come into effect.

Government Response

• MDR: The government has instructed banks to make sure that merchants do not pass on this charge to customers. But it has not specified how banks are expected to check whether merchants tweak their prices to absorb this additional charge. The government has denied any U.S. pressure to bring these rates to favour American credit card companies.

• Manipur: The State government must move quickly to contain this outbreak of hostilities. It must work with civil society to lower the rhetoric while acting against the armed groups with the help of the security forces.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to the MDR structure or the Manipur conflict.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• MDR:

  • Article 21: Right to Life, which includes the right to a decent standard of living.

  • Financial Inclusion: The government has a responsibility to ensure financial inclusion for all.

  • Governance: The article highlights the need for a simpler and more transparent MDR structure.

• Manipur:

  • Article 21: Right to Life, which includes the right to safety and security.

  • Article 14: Equality before Law. Criminal law must apply equally across communities in the hills.

  • Federalism: The state government must act firmly and even-handedly to contain the outbreak of hostilities.

  • Governance: The article highlights the need for firm, even-handed state action to ensure the safety and welfare of all civilians.

Social and Political Significance

• MDR:

  • Digital Economy: The MDR structure could impact the adoption of UPI in India.

  • Small Merchants: The complexity of the rules could increase the compliance burden on small merchants.

  • Political Sensitivity: The MDR structure is designed to keep political backlash in mind.

• Manipur:

  • Ethnic Conflict: The new fault line between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities threatens to further destabilise the state.

  • Humanitarian Crisis: Many of those displaced remain in relief camps; over 700 have died in these camps.

  • National Security: The conflict in Manipur is a threat to national security.

  • Social Harmony: The conflict threatens to tear apart the social fabric of the state.

Challenges

• MDR:

  1. Complexity: The MDR structure is overly complex.

  2. Compliance Burden: The rules increase the compliance burden on small merchants.

  3. Lack of Clarity: The rules are not clear on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

  4. Political Considerations: The MDR structure is designed to keep political backlash in mind.

• Manipur:

  1. New Ethnic Fault Line: The new conflict between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities.

  2. Humanitarian Crisis: Many of those displaced remain in relief camps; over 700 have died in these camps.

  3. Blockades: Blockades imposed by partisans of the communities have held up essentials and medicines.

  4. Armed Groups: Armed groups claiming to act on behalf of their respective communities are perpetuating the violence.

  5. Political Instability: With its tenure ending soon and Assembly elections due next year, the State government must move quickly.

Way Forward

• MDR:

  1. Simplify the Structure: The government should simplify the MDR structure.

  2. Reduce Compliance Burden: The government should reduce the compliance burden on small merchants.

  3. Provide Clarity: The government should provide clarity on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

  4. RBI Funding: There is still an argument to be made for the Reserve Bank of India to foot this bill from the vast surpluses it generates every year.

• Manipur:

  1. Firm, Even-Handed State Action: The State government must move quickly to contain this outbreak of hostilities.

  2. Work with Civil Society: It must work with civil society to lower the rhetoric.

  3. Act Against Armed Groups: It must act against the armed groups with the help of the security forces.

  4. Deter Blockades: Those imposing blockades must be deterred by the force of law.

  5. Equal Application of Law: Criminal law must apply equally across communities in the hills.

  6. Guarantee Safety: The safety and welfare of civilians must be guaranteed irrespective of ethnicity.

Conclusion

The two issues discussed—the MDR structure on UPI and the new fault lines in Manipur—are distinct but interconnected. Both highlight the challenges of governance in a complex and rapidly changing India.

The MDR structure on UPI shows how political considerations can dilute economic benefits. The overly complex rate structure could potentially slow the adoption of UPI in India. The government should simplify the structure and reduce the compliance burden on small merchants.

The new fault lines in Manipur highlight the fragility of peace in the state. The State government must act firmly and even-handedly to contain the outbreak of hostilities and ensure the safety and welfare of all civilians.

The way forward requires a nuanced understanding of both issues. For MDR, it requires simplifying the structure and reducing the compliance burden on small merchants. For Manipur, it requires firm, even-handed state action to contain the outbreak of hostilities and ensure the safety and welfare of all civilians.

The time for action is now. The future of India’s digital economy and the future of peace in Manipur depend on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “A fear of political fallout has led to an overly complex MDR structure on UPI.” Discuss this statement in the context of the recent announcement of MDR charges for UPI transactions.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) charges announced for UPI transactions show how political considerations can dilute economic benefits. In a quest to preempt political attacks, the rate structure announced by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has been made overly complex.
Key Issues:

1. Complexity: The rules have created different gradations for small merchants, essential sectors, and capital market payments.

2. Compliance Burden: The rules increase the compliance burden on small merchants.

3. Lack of Clarity: The rules are not clear on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

4. Political Considerations: The MDR structure is designed to keep political backlash in mind.
   The government should simplify the structure and reduce the compliance burden on small merchants.

Q2. What are the implications of the MDR structure for small merchants and the adoption of UPI in India? Suggest measures to address these challenges.
Answer: The implications of the MDR structure for small merchants and the adoption of UPI are:

1. Compliance Burden: The complexity of the rules could increase the compliance burden on small merchants.

2. Refusal to Accept UPI: In the short run, it will likely result in small merchants simply refusing to accept UPI until greater clarity emerges.

3. Slower Adoption: The complexity could potentially slow the adoption of UPI in India.
   Measures to address these challenges:

4. Simplify the Structure: The government should simplify the MDR structure.

5. Reduce Compliance Burden: The government should reduce the compliance burden on small merchants.

6. Provide Clarity: The government should provide clarity on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

7. RBI Funding: There is still an argument to be made for the Reserve Bank of India to foot this bill from the vast surpluses it generates every year.

Q3. Discuss the new ethnic fault line in Manipur between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities. What are its implications for peace and stability in the state?
Answer: Since February, violence between the Naga and Kuki-Zo communities – which began as localised disputes – has spread across the hill districts. Till July, at least 15 Kuki-Zo people, 11 Nagas, three security personnel and a truck driver were killed; more have died in the last two months. Houses in Naga and Kuki-Zo villages have been burnt down and the newly displaced have moved into camps.
Implications for Peace and Stability:

1. Further Destabilisation: The new conflict threatens to further destabilise the state.

2. Humanitarian Crisis: Blockades imposed by partisans of the communities against the other have held up essentials and medicines, with the smaller Kuki-Zo community the worse affected.

3. Dysfunctional Health Centres: Health centres in the hills have been left dysfunctional.

4. Echoes of the 1990s: This echoes the Naga-Kuki violence of the 1990s, now revived by armed groups.
   The State government must move quickly to contain this outbreak of hostilities.

Q4. “The State government must move quickly to contain this outbreak of hostilities.” In light of this statement, suggest measures to restore peace and stability in Manipur.
Answer: To restore peace and stability in Manipur:

1. Firm, Even-Handed State Action: The State government must move quickly to contain this outbreak of hostilities.

2. Work with Civil Society: It must work with civil society to lower the rhetoric.

3. Act Against Armed Groups: It must act against the armed groups with the help of the security forces.

4. Deter Blockades: Those imposing blockades must be deterred by the force of law.

5. Equal Application of Law: Criminal law must apply equally across communities in the hills.

6. Guarantee Safety: The safety and welfare of civilians must be guaranteed irrespective of ethnicity.

7. Political Engagement: The government must engage with all stakeholders to find a political solution.

8. Humanitarian Assistance: The government must provide adequate humanitarian assistance to those displaced.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to address the dual challenges of digital payment regulation and ethnic conflict in Manipur.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy to address the dual challenges must include:

1. Digital Payment Regulation:

   • Simplify the Structure: The government should simplify the MDR structure.

   • Reduce Compliance Burden: The government should reduce the compliance burden on small merchants.

   • Provide Clarity: The government should provide clarity on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

   • RBI Funding: There is still an argument to be made for the Reserve Bank of India to foot this bill from the vast surpluses it generates every year.

2. Ethnic Conflict in Manipur:

   • Firm, Even-Handed State Action: The State government must move quickly to contain this outbreak of hostilities.

   • Work with Civil Society: It must work with civil society to lower the rhetoric.

   • Act Against Armed Groups: It must act against the armed groups with the help of the security forces.

   • Deter Blockades: Those imposing blockades must be deterred by the force of law.

   • Equal Application of Law: Criminal law must apply equally across communities in the hills.

   • Guarantee Safety: The safety and welfare of civilians must be guaranteed irrespective of ethnicity.
     The time for action is now. The future of India’s digital economy and the future of peace in Manipur depend on the choices made today.

AI Makes Editors Read the Writer as Well as the Text: Navigating the New Frontier of Publishing Ethics

Why in News?

A recent article by Vasudevan Mukunth, a commissioning editor, highlights a growing challenge in the publishing industry: the proliferation of AI-written or AI-polished submissions. The article, titled “AI makes editors read the writer as well as the text,” argues that editors are often caught between their duty to the readers and employers and the demands of the publishing process. The habit of using AI to write or polish articles has the potential to corrode the human practice of writing. This development raises critical questions about authorship, authenticity, and the role of editors in the age of Artificial Intelligence.

Introduction

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has permeated every facet of human activity, including the creative and intellectual domain of writing. Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and others can now generate coherent, well-structured, and even stylistically pleasing prose on a wide range of topics. While this technology offers unprecedented convenience and efficiency, it also poses a fundamental challenge to the integrity of the publishing process.

The article by Vasudevan Mukunth provides a first-person account of the dilemmas faced by a commissioning editor. Every day, he receives more submissions of articles written by AI than at any time in the past. The same goes for articles polished by AI. This habit, he argues, has the potential to corrode the human practice of writing. Writing is often hard. It involves a complex relationship between intentions and the meaning of words laid down on a page. AI-made or polished writing offers to take this trouble away—a temptation to be resisted. This article analyses the key issues raised by AI in publishing, the challenges it poses, and the way forward.

Background

The Nature of Writing and the AI Challenge

Writing is often hard. You consider the relationship between your intentions and the meaning of words laid down on a page. You think through using the many degrees of freedom a sentence or paragraph affords to convey precisely what you mean, down to the feeling, while also holding readers’ attention and doing justice to yourself without becoming self-absorbed. Writing should trouble the mind. AI-made or polished writing offers to take this trouble away—a temptation to be resisted.

AI-written or AI-polished text can be corrosive to readers as well because all such texts, no matter how diverse their contents, read the same way. Editing it to be more human, to have an undulating rhythm rather than that sterilised glaze, is also an exasperating experience.

The Editor’s Dilemma

Editors are often caught between their duty to the readers and employers and the demands of the publishing process. In these instances, the editor needs to negotiate a way forward. If the author is a rookie, the editor may insist on seeing the timestamped version history of the document containing their text, and ensure the words didn’t suddenly appear all at once. If there are doubts at the time of commissioning, the editor may insist the author quote some experts firsthand and submit their reporting notes together with the finished article. If the editor has a mature relationship with an author, they can directly communicate the stakes and possible courses of action.

But when an author doesn’t tick these convenient boxes, the editor needs to draft a reply that balances several sensibilities:

1. Do Not Vilify: The editor must not offend the author. In fact, there is no intention of vilifying them: people use AI models with text for various reasons, only a small subset of which are malicious.

2. Elicit Honesty: The editor needs to elicit from the author an honest response about whether, and if so how, they used AI – especially a reply that can be sure is unencumbered by insecurities or second-guessing.

3. Maintain Trust: The editor needs to keep the author’s trust while maintaining that they cannot accept AI-written or -polished text.

4. Justify the Decision: The editor must justify, if required, their decision to repose their trust in those tools rather than in their judgment and/or in their relationship with the author.

The Limitations of AI Detectors

To aid in this process, the editor used to maintain a list of the hallmarks of AI-written or -polished text, but as they evolved, they turned to two ‘detector’ tools: GPTZero and Pangram. They trust them because of their favourable coverage in the scientific press, their developers’ attitude towards the tools’ role in the publishing enterprise, and their lower false-positive rates. A false positive is when a tool flags a piece as being AI-written when in reality it is not. It can be pernicious because it causes the editor to decline a submission they may have accepted, potentially disappointing an author. Such a result may also cause editors to develop an unfavourable opinion of such contributors.

Sometimes, these tools jointly return very high or very low scores, allowing the editor to decide quickly about accepting or declining submissions. The problem arises when one or both tools return a middling score, e.g., “50% chance of being written by AI” or “50% of the text is written by AI”.

Now, if GPTZero and Pangram independently falsely flag 5 out of every 100 articles as being AI-written or -polished, they will have a combined false positive rate of just 1 in 4 million. However, the chance of one tool flagging an article right and the other flagging it wrong is still 1 in 1,000, which is much higher.

But the editor cannot make decisions with mathematics alone as their guide. AI has caused them to think more closely about the author submitting an article and their reasons to use – or not use – AI. Similarly, it would help if authors think more closely about editors, who are caught between their duty to their readers and employers on one hand and to facilitate the publishing process on the other.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Corrosion of the Human Practice of Writing

The article argues that the habit of using AI to write or polish articles has the potential to corrode the human practice of writing. Writing is a complex cognitive process that involves the relationship between intentions and the meaning of words. AI-made or polished writing offers to take this trouble away, which is a temptation to be resisted.

2. The Homogenisation of Content

The article highlights that AI-written or AI-polished text can be corrosive to readers because all such texts, no matter how diverse their contents, read the same way. Editing it to be more human, to have an undulating rhythm rather than that sterilised glaze, is an exasperating experience. This homogenisation of content threatens to erode the diversity and authenticity of published material.

3. The Editor’s Dilemma

The article notes that editors are often caught between their duty to the readers and employers and the demands of the publishing process. They must negotiate a way forward that balances several sensibilities: not vilifying the author, eliciting honesty, maintaining trust, and justifying their decision.

4. The Limitations of AI Detectors

The article highlights the limitations of AI detectors. The tools can return false positives, which can be pernicious because they cause the editor to decline a submission they may have accepted. The problem arises when one or both tools return a middling score. The editor cannot make decisions with mathematics alone as their guide.

5. The Need for a Nuanced Approach

The article argues that AI has caused editors to think more closely about the author submitting an article and their reasons to use – or not use – AI. Similarly, it would help if authors think more closely about editors, who are caught between their duty to their readers and employers on one hand and to facilitate the publishing process on the other.

Timeline of Events

• Recent: Vasudevan Mukunth publishes an article on the challenges of AI in publishing.

• Recent: Editors report receiving more submissions of articles written by AI than at any time in the past.

• Recent: Editors use AI detector tools like GPTZero and Pangram to identify AI-written text.

• September 18, 1976: The Hindu archives report on the bright future for computers in India.

• September 18, 1926: The Hindu archives report on a lecture on advertising.

Government Response

The provided article does not mention any specific government response to the use of AI in publishing. However, the broader context of AI regulation in India is relevant. The government has been working on a framework for responsible AI, which may include guidelines for content generation and disclosure.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to AI in publishing. However, the broader issue of copyright and authorship in the age of AI is a subject of ongoing legal debate globally.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Article 19(1)(a): Freedom of speech and expression. The use of AI in writing raises questions about the authenticity of expression.

• Article 21: Right to Life and Personal Liberty.

• Intellectual Property Rights: The use of AI in writing raises questions about authorship and copyright.

• Governance: The article highlights the need for a nuanced approach to AI in publishing, balancing the benefits of technology with the integrity of the publishing process.

Social and Political Significance

• Trust in Media: The use of AI in writing can erode trust in media and publishing.

• Authenticity: AI-written content threatens the authenticity of human expression.

• Diversity: The homogenisation of content threatens to erode the diversity of published material.

• Employment: The use of AI in writing could impact the employment of writers and editors.

• Ethics: The use of AI in writing raises ethical questions about honesty and transparency.

Challenges

1. Detection: AI detectors are not foolproof and can return false positives.

2. Compliance: There is no standard for disclosing the use of AI in writing.

3. Trust: The use of AI can erode trust between authors, editors, and readers.

4. Homogenisation: AI-written content tends to be homogeneous.

5. Ethical Dilemmas: Editors face ethical dilemmas in deciding whether to accept AI-written content.

6. Lack of Guidelines: There is a lack of clear guidelines for the use of AI in publishing.

Way Forward

1. Develop Clear Guidelines: Develop clear guidelines for the use of AI in publishing, including disclosure requirements.

2. Improve AI Detectors: Invest in improving the accuracy of AI detectors.

3. Promote Transparency: Encourage authors to be transparent about their use of AI.

4. Maintain Human Oversight: Ensure that human editors maintain oversight of the publishing process.

5. Foster Dialogue: Foster a dialogue between authors, editors, and readers about the use of AI in writing.

6. Protect Human Writing: Protect and promote the human practice of writing.

7. Ethical Framework: Develop an ethical framework for the use of AI in creative and intellectual work.

Conclusion

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has permeated every facet of human activity, including the creative and intellectual domain of writing. The article by Vasudevan Mukunth provides a first-person account of the dilemmas faced by a commissioning editor. Every day, he receives more submissions of articles written by AI than at any time in the past. This habit, he argues, has the potential to corrode the human practice of writing.

The way forward requires a nuanced understanding of both the benefits and the challenges of AI in publishing. It requires developing clear guidelines, improving AI detectors, promoting transparency, maintaining human oversight, fostering dialogue, protecting human writing, and developing an ethical framework.

The time for action is now. The future of writing and publishing depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “AI makes editors read the writer as well as the text.” Discuss this statement in the context of the challenges posed by AI to the publishing industry.
Answer: The statement is accurate. AI makes editors read the writer as well as the text. Editors are often caught between their duty to the readers and employers and the demands of the publishing process. The habit of using AI to write or polish articles has the potential to corrode the human practice of writing.
Key Issues:

1. Corrosion of Human Writing: Writing is a complex cognitive process. AI-made or polished writing offers to take this trouble away, which is a temptation to be resisted.

2. Homogenisation of Content: AI-written or AI-polished text can be corrosive to readers because all such texts read the same way.

3. Editor’s Dilemma: Editors must negotiate a way forward that balances several sensibilities: not vilifying the author, eliciting honesty, maintaining trust, and justifying their decision.

4. Limitations of AI Detectors: AI detectors are not foolproof and can return false positives.
   The way forward requires developing clear guidelines, improving AI detectors, promoting transparency, and maintaining human oversight.

Q2. Discuss the ethical dilemmas faced by editors in the age of AI-generated content. How can these dilemmas be resolved?
Answer: The ethical dilemmas faced by editors are:

1. Authenticity: Should editors accept AI-written or AI-polished content?

2. Transparency: Should authors be required to disclose their use of AI?

3. Trust: How can editors maintain trust with authors while maintaining the integrity of the publishing process?

4. Fairness: How can editors ensure that AI-written content does not disadvantage human writers?
   Resolving these dilemmas:

5. Develop Clear Guidelines: Develop clear guidelines for the use of AI in publishing, including disclosure requirements.

6. Improve AI Detectors: Invest in improving the accuracy of AI detectors.

7. Promote Transparency: Encourage authors to be transparent about their use of AI.

8. Maintain Human Oversight: Ensure that human editors maintain oversight of the publishing process.

9. Foster Dialogue: Foster a dialogue between authors, editors, and readers about the use of AI in writing.

Q3. What are the limitations of AI detectors in identifying AI-written text? How can these limitations be addressed?
Answer: The limitations of AI detectors are:

1. False Positives: AI detectors can return false positives, which can be pernicious because they cause the editor to decline a submission they may have accepted.

2. Middling Scores: The problem arises when one or both tools return a middling score, e.g., “50% chance of being written by AI”.

3. Evolving Technology: AI models are constantly evolving, making it difficult for detectors to keep up.
   Addressing these limitations:

4. Improve Accuracy: Invest in improving the accuracy of AI detectors.

5. Use Multiple Tools: Use multiple tools to cross-verify results.

6. Human Judgment: Rely on human judgment and not just on AI detectors.

7. Transparency: Encourage authors to be transparent about their use of AI.

8. Develop Standards: Develop standards for the use of AI in publishing.

Q4. “The use of AI in writing has the potential to corrode the human practice of writing.” Critically examine this statement.
Answer: The statement is accurate. Writing is often hard. It involves a complex relationship between intentions and the meaning of words laid down on a page. You think through using the many degrees of freedom a sentence or paragraph affords to convey precisely what you mean, down to the feeling, while also holding readers’ attention and doing justice to yourself without becoming self-absorbed. Writing should trouble the mind. AI-made or polished writing offers to take this trouble away—a temptation to be resisted.
Corrosion of Human Writing:

1. Loss of Skill: The use of AI can lead to a loss of writing skills.

2. Homogenisation: AI-written content tends to be homogeneous.

3. Lack of Authenticity: AI-written content lacks the authenticity of human expression.

4. Erosion of Trust: The use of AI can erode trust between authors, editors, and readers.
   The way forward requires protecting and promoting the human practice of writing.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for the publishing industry to navigate the challenges posed by AI.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy for the publishing industry to navigate the challenges posed by AI must include:

1. Develop Clear Guidelines: Develop clear guidelines for the use of AI in publishing, including disclosure requirements.

2. Improve AI Detectors: Invest in improving the accuracy of AI detectors.

3. Promote Transparency: Encourage authors to be transparent about their use of AI.

4. Maintain Human Oversight: Ensure that human editors maintain oversight of the publishing process.

5. Foster Dialogue: Foster a dialogue between authors, editors, and readers about the use of AI in writing.

6. Protect Human Writing: Protect and promote the human practice of writing.

7. Ethical Framework: Develop an ethical framework for the use of AI in creative and intellectual work.

8. Training: Train editors and writers on the ethical use of AI.

9. Research: Invest in research on the impact of AI on writing and publishing.

10. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize the integrity of the publishing process.
    The time for action is now. The future of writing and publishing depends on the choices made today.

India’s Multifaceted Governance Landscape: Energy Security, Global Finance, and Domestic Resilience

Why in News?

A compilation of recent data points by The Hindu Data Team highlights five significant and interconnected developments that reflect India’s complex governance landscape and its position in a rapidly changing world:

1. Surge in Coal Imports: Indian power producers’ coal imports rose to 5.52 million metric tonnes in August 2026, a 15-month high, driven by a heatwave and lower hydropower generation.

2. India-Russia Diplomacy: Ukraine has received the bodies of 252 people, including 23 Indian nationals, in an exchange of war dead with Russia.

3. World Bank’s Private Capital Attraction: The World Bank attracted $112 billion in private capital in the year ended June 2026, more than triple the amount in fiscal 2022.

4. Ukraine’s Defence Spending: The Ukrainian government plans to spend two-thirds of its budget on defence next year, amounting to 4.9 trillion hryvnia (approximately $118 billion).

5. Drought in Karnataka: The Karnataka government has declared 23 more taluks as drought-hit, taking the total to 124, amid dry conditions in several parts of the State.

Together, these data points illustrate the interconnected challenges of energy security, international diplomacy, global finance, geopolitical conflict, and climate resilience that India and the world must navigate.

Introduction

The modern world is characterized by a high degree of interconnectedness, where a heatwave in India can impact global coal markets, a war in Europe can affect the repatriation of Indian citizens, and a drought in Karnataka can strain state finances. The five data points in the provided clipping offer a snapshot of this complex reality. They highlight the challenges of ensuring energy security in a climate-stressed world, the humanitarian dimensions of international conflict, the evolving role of multilateral institutions in mobilizing private capital, the staggering economic cost of war, and the growing threat of climate-induced disasters.

This article analyses each of these developments, their key issues, challenges, and the way forward, within the broader framework of India’s governance and its engagement with the world.

Background

1. Increase in Indian Utilities’ August Coal Imports

India’s power producers’ coal imports jumped 85.6% year-on-year to 5.52 million metric tonnes in August 2026, marking a 15-month high. This surge was driven by a heatwave and lower hydropower generation, which boosted electricity demand. The increase in coal imports highlights the continued dependence of India’s power sector on coal, even as the country pursues ambitious renewable energy targets.

Key Issues:

• Energy Security: The surge in imports indicates a reliance on imported coal, which exposes India to global price volatility and supply chain disruptions.

• Climate Change: The heatwave, which drove up electricity demand, is a symptom of climate change. The increased use of coal for power generation contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, creating a vicious cycle.

• Hydropower Variability: Lower hydropower generation due to deficient rainfall or other factors necessitates the use of thermal power, including coal-based plants.

• Economic Impact: Higher coal imports put pressure on the current account deficit and the rupee.

2. Number of Deceased Persons Returned to Ukraine by Russia

Ukraine has received the bodies of 252 people in an exchange of war dead with Russia, Ukrainian authorities said on Thursday. Russia received 23 bodies in return, Russian lawmaker Shamsail Saraliev was quoted as saying by the RBK news outlet. Notably, 23 of the 252 bodies returned to Ukraine were of Indian nationals who had been recruited into the Russian army. This development highlights the human cost of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has now directly impacted Indian citizens.

Key Issues:

• Humanitarian Crisis: The exchange of war dead is a grim reminder of the human toll of the conflict.

• Safety of Indian Nationals: The presence of Indian nationals in the Russian army raises serious questions about the safety and welfare of Indian citizens abroad.

• Diplomacy: The return of the bodies is a result of diplomatic efforts between India, Russia, and Ukraine.

• Legal and Ethical Issues: The recruitment of Indian nationals into a foreign army raises legal and ethical questions.

3. Private Capital Attracted by the World Bank

The World Bank on Thursday said it attracted $112 billion in private capital in the year ended June 2026 versus $69 billion a year earlier, and more than triple the amount in fiscal 2022 before former Mastercard CEO Ajay Banga became president. This significant increase in private capital mobilization is a key indicator of the World Bank’s evolving role in global development finance.

Key Issues:

• Mobilizing Private Capital: The World Bank’s ability to attract private capital is crucial for financing development projects, especially in the Global South.

• Role of Leadership: The appointment of Ajay Banga as president has been credited with the increase in private capital.

• Development Finance: The shift towards private capital mobilization reflects a broader trend in development finance, where public resources are supplemented by private investment.

• Risk and Return: Attracting private capital requires creating a conducive investment climate and de-risking projects.

4. Amount to be Spent on Defence by Ukraine in 2027

The Ukrainian government plans to spend two-thirds of its budget on defence next year, amounting to 4.9 trillion hryvnia (approximately $118 billion). Russia’s four-and-a-half-year offensive has battered Ukraine’s economy, causing billions of dollars in destruction and punching a huge hole in its neighbour’s finances. This staggering defence budget highlights the immense economic cost of the war on Ukraine.

Key Issues:

• Economic Cost of War: The war has devastated Ukraine’s economy, and the massive defence spending is a reflection of the existential threat the country faces.

• Fiscal Sustainability: Spending two-thirds of the budget on defence is fiscally unsustainable in the long run. Ukraine is heavily dependent on external aid.

• Global Implications: The war has global implications, including for food and energy security.

• Rebuilding: The scale of destruction means that rebuilding Ukraine will require massive international investment.

5. Number of Taluks Declared Drought-Hit in Karnataka

The Karnataka government on Thursday declared 23 more taluks as drought-affected, taking the total number of drought-hit taluks so far to 124, amid dry conditions in several parts of the State. This declaration highlights the growing threat of climate-induced disasters in India.

Key Issues:

• Climate Change: The drought is a symptom of climate change, which is leading to more frequent and severe extreme weather events.

• Agricultural Distress: Drought severely impacts agriculture, leading to crop failure, farmer distress, and rural unemployment.

• Water Scarcity: Drought leads to water scarcity, affecting drinking water supply, industry, and power generation.

• State Finances: Drought relief and rehabilitation put a strain on state finances.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Interconnectedness of Global and Local Challenges

The five data points illustrate the interconnectedness of global and local challenges. A heatwave in India (local) drives up coal imports (global), a war in Europe (global) affects Indian citizens (local), and a drought in Karnataka (local) is a symptom of global climate change.

2. The Persistent Challenge of Energy Security

The surge in coal imports highlights India’s continued dependence on coal, despite its renewable energy ambitions. This dependence exposes India to global price volatility and supply chain disruptions. The challenge is to accelerate the transition to clean energy while ensuring energy security.

3. The Human Cost of Geopolitical Conflict

The return of the bodies of Indian nationals from Russia is a stark reminder of the human cost of geopolitical conflict. It raises questions about the safety and welfare of Indian citizens abroad and the need for stronger diplomatic efforts to protect them.

4. The Evolving Role of Multilateral Institutions

The World Bank’s success in attracting $112 billion in private capital highlights the evolving role of multilateral institutions in mobilizing private finance for development. This is crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and addressing global challenges like climate change.

5. The Staggering Economic Cost of War

Ukraine’s plan to spend two-thirds of its budget on defence highlights the staggering economic cost of war. The conflict has devastated Ukraine’s economy and will require massive international investment for reconstruction.

6. The Growing Threat of Climate-Induced Disasters

The drought in Karnataka is a reminder of the growing threat of climate-induced disasters in India. Droughts, floods, and heatwaves are becoming more frequent and severe, impacting agriculture, water security, and livelihoods.

Timeline of Events

• August 2026: Indian power producers’ coal imports rise to 5.52 million metric tonnes, a 15-month high.

• Recent: Ukraine receives the bodies of 252 people, including 23 Indian nationals, in an exchange of war dead with Russia.

• Year ended June 2026: The World Bank attracts $112 billion in private capital.

• 2027 (Planned): Ukraine plans to spend 4.9 trillion hryvnia on defence.

• Recent: Karnataka declares 23 more taluks as drought-hit, taking the total to 124.

Government Response

• Coal Imports: The government is monitoring the situation and is taking steps to increase domestic coal production and promote renewable energy.

• Indian Nationals in Russia: The government has been in diplomatic contact with Russia and Ukraine to ensure the safety and return of Indian nationals.

• World Bank: The government is engaging with the World Bank to mobilize private capital for development projects.

• Ukraine War: India has advocated for a peaceful resolution to the conflict through dialogue and diplomacy.

• Drought in Karnataka: The state government has declared 23 more taluks as drought-hit and is providing relief to affected farmers and communities.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to these data points.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Energy Security: Article 21 (Right to Life) includes the right to energy security. The government has a constitutional obligation to ensure affordable and reliable energy for all.

• Protection of Citizens Abroad: Article 21 (Right to Life) also extends to the protection of citizens abroad. The government has a responsibility to protect the safety and welfare of Indian nationals overseas.

• Climate Change: Article 48A (Protection of Environment) and Article 51A(g) (Fundamental Duty to Protect Environment) provide the constitutional basis for climate action.

• Disaster Management: The Disaster Management Act, 2005, provides the legal framework for disaster management in India.

• Federalism: Drought management is a shared responsibility between the center and states.

Social and Political Significance

• Coal Imports: The surge in coal imports has implications for energy prices, inflation, and the current account deficit.

• Indian Nationals in Russia: The return of the bodies has sparked a political debate about the safety of Indian nationals abroad.

• World Bank: The increase in private capital mobilization is a positive development for global development finance.

• Ukraine War: The war has global implications, including for food and energy security.

• Drought in Karnataka: The drought has severe social and political implications, including farmer distress, rural unemployment, and migration.

Challenges

1. Energy Transition: Balancing energy security with the transition to clean energy.

2. Protection of Citizens Abroad: Ensuring the safety and welfare of Indian nationals in conflict zones.

3. Mobilizing Private Capital: Creating a conducive investment climate and de-risking projects.

4. Economic Cost of War: Addressing the staggering economic cost of war and its global implications.

5. Climate Resilience: Building resilience to climate-induced disasters like droughts and floods.

6. Data Deficits: The lack of timely and accurate data on climate migration, drought, and other issues hampers effective policymaking.

Way Forward

1. Accelerate Renewable Energy: Invest in renewable energy, battery storage, and grid infrastructure to reduce dependence on coal.

2. Strengthen Diplomatic Efforts: Strengthen diplomatic efforts to protect Indian nationals abroad.

3. Reform Multilateral Institutions: Reform multilateral institutions to better mobilize private capital for development.

4. Promote Peace: Advocate for a peaceful resolution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

5. Invest in Climate Resilience: Invest in drought-resistant crops, water conservation, and early warning systems.

6. Improve Data Collection: Establish a robust, real-time data collection mechanism for climate-induced disasters.

7. Social Safety Nets: Strengthen social safety nets for farmers and vulnerable communities.

Conclusion

The five data points discussed—coal imports, the return of war dead, private capital mobilization, Ukraine’s defence spending, and drought in Karnataka—are distinct but interconnected. They reflect the complex and multifaceted challenges facing India and the world.

The way forward requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses both the global and local dimensions of these challenges. It requires accelerating the energy transition, strengthening diplomatic efforts, reforming multilateral institutions, promoting peace, investing in climate resilience, improving data collection, and strengthening social safety nets.

The time for action is now. The future of India’s energy security, its citizens abroad, its development finance, and its climate resilience depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “India’s coal imports have surged to a 15-month high.” Discuss the reasons for this surge and its implications for India’s energy security.
Answer: India’s power producers’ coal imports jumped 85.6% year-on-year to 5.52 million metric tonnes in August 2026, marking a 15-month high. The surge was driven by:

1. Heatwave: A heatwave boosted electricity demand.

2. Lower Hydropower Generation: Lower hydropower generation necessitated the use of thermal power.
   Implications for Energy Security:

3. Import Dependence: The surge indicates a reliance on imported coal, exposing India to global price volatility and supply chain disruptions.

4. Current Account Deficit: Higher coal imports put pressure on the current account deficit and the rupee.

5. Climate Change: The increased use of coal for power generation contributes to greenhouse gas emissions.
   The way forward requires accelerating the transition to clean energy while ensuring energy security.

Q2. Discuss the humanitarian and diplomatic dimensions of the return of the bodies of Indian nationals from Russia.
Answer: Ukraine has received the bodies of 252 people in an exchange of war dead with Russia. Notably, 23 of the 252 bodies returned to Ukraine were of Indian nationals who had been recruited into the Russian army.
Humanitarian Dimensions:

1. Human Cost of Conflict: The exchange of war dead is a grim reminder of the human toll of the conflict.

2. Safety of Indian Nationals: The presence of Indian nationals in the Russian army raises serious questions about their safety and welfare.
   Diplomatic Dimensions:

3. Diplomatic Efforts: The return of the bodies is a result of diplomatic efforts between India, Russia, and Ukraine.

4. Legal and Ethical Issues: The recruitment of Indian nationals into a foreign army raises legal and ethical questions.
   The way forward requires strengthening diplomatic efforts to protect Indian nationals abroad.

Q3. “The World Bank’s ability to attract private capital is crucial for financing development projects.” Discuss this statement in the context of the recent increase in private capital mobilization.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The World Bank on Thursday said it attracted $112 billion in private capital in the year ended June 2026 versus $69 billion a year earlier, and more than triple the amount in fiscal 2022.
Significance:

1. Financing Development: The World Bank’s ability to attract private capital is crucial for financing development projects, especially in the Global South.

2. Role of Leadership: The appointment of Ajay Banga as president has been credited with the increase in private capital.

3. Development Finance: The shift towards private capital mobilization reflects a broader trend in development finance.
   Challenges:

4. Risk and Return: Attracting private capital requires creating a conducive investment climate and de-risking projects.

5. Sustainability: Ensuring that private capital is deployed in a sustainable and inclusive manner.
   The way forward requires reforming multilateral institutions to better mobilize private capital.

Q4. “Ukraine’s plan to spend two-thirds of its budget on defence highlights the staggering economic cost of war.” Critically examine this statement.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The Ukrainian government plans to spend two-thirds of its budget on defence next year, amounting to 4.9 trillion hryvnia (approximately $118 billion). Russia’s four-and-a-half-year offensive has battered Ukraine’s economy, causing billions of dollars in destruction and punching a huge hole in its neighbour’s finances.
Economic Cost of War:

1. Devastated Economy: The war has devastated Ukraine’s economy.

2. Fiscal Unsustainability: Spending two-thirds of the budget on defence is fiscally unsustainable in the long run.

3. Global Implications: The war has global implications, including for food and energy security.

4. Rebuilding: The scale of destruction means that rebuilding Ukraine will require massive international investment.
   The way forward requires a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to address the dual challenges of energy security and climate resilience.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy to address the dual challenges must include:

1. Energy Security:

   • Accelerate Renewable Energy: Invest in renewable energy, battery storage, and grid infrastructure.

   • Diversify Energy Sources: Diversify energy sources to reduce vulnerability to oil shocks.

   • Strategic Petroleum Reserves: Maintain adequate strategic petroleum reserves.

2. Climate Resilience:

   • Invest in Climate Resilience: Invest in drought-resistant crops, water conservation, and early warning systems.

   • Improve Data Collection: Establish a robust, real-time data collection mechanism for climate-induced disasters.

   • Social Safety Nets: Strengthen social safety nets for farmers and vulnerable communities.

   • International Cooperation: Work with other countries to combat climate change.
     The time for action is now. The future of India’s energy security and climate resilience depends on the choices made today.

The Uniform Civil Code Debate: Constitutional Morality, Gender Justice, and the Quest for Secular Personal Laws

Why in News?

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has indicated that the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) would be implemented in all 21 NDA-ruled States by 2029. Uttarakhand has had a UCC in force since January 2025, while UCC bills passed by the legislatures of Assam, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh are awaiting Presidential assent. This development has reignited one of the most contentious debates in Indian constitutional and political discourse. The article by Rangarajan R., a former IAS officer, provides a comprehensive explainer on the UCC debate, examining how personal laws are governed today, what the Constitution says about a UCC, the arguments for and against it, and how a UCC could guarantee equal rights for women.

Introduction

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is one of the most debated and politically charged issues in contemporary India. It refers to the proposal to replace the personal laws of various religious communities—which currently govern matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption—with a common set of secular laws applicable to all citizens, irrespective of their religion, caste, or tribe.

Article 44 of the Constitution provides that “The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” However, this provision is part of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), which are non-justiciable. The debate over the UCC involves fundamental questions about the relationship between religion and the state, the nature of secularism in India, the rights of minorities, and the quest for gender justice. This article analyses the key issues, the constitutional and governance dimensions, and the way forward.

Background

How Are Personal Matters Governed Today?

Article 44 of the Constitution provides that the State shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout India. A UCC would apply the same set of secular personal laws to all people, irrespective of religion, caste, or tribe. India already has uniform criminal laws and common civil laws covering matters such as taxation, contracts, and negotiable instruments.

However, in matters such as marriage, divorce, and inheritance of property, various religious communities in India follow personal laws that are based on their religious customs. Hindus are governed by laws such as the Hindu Marriage Act (1955) and the Hindu Succession Act (1956), while many tribals within the Hindu religion may follow customary family laws under constitutional exceptions. Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs are covered by Hindu laws. Sikh marriages can also be registered under the Anand Marriage Act (2012). Christians and Parsis have their own personal laws, while Muslims are governed by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (1937).

What Are the Pros and Cons?

The Constitution makers were divided over including a UCC in the Constitution. Some wanted it to be made a Fundamental Right to ensure uniformity in civil laws and secure equal rights for women. However, many members of the Muslim community were not in favour of including it in the Constitution as they felt that a uniform civil code would violate the fundamental right to religion that is guaranteed in Part III. Finally, the provision relating to UCC was placed in the non-justiciable Part IV – Directive Principles of State Policy.

There are several arguments over aspects of the UCC. The key arguments in its favour are:

1. True Secularism: It would make India secular in the true sense by subjecting all citizens to the same personal laws.

2. Gender Justice: A UCC would ensure equal rights for women across religions in matters governed by personal laws.

The key arguments against the UCC are:

1. Conflict with Fundamental Rights: There can be potential conflict between the provisions of the UCC and guaranteed fundamental rights. Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees every person a fundamental right to practise a religion of one’s choice. Article 29 provides a fundamental right to any section of citizens to conserve their distinct culture.

2. Contrary to Scriptures: The provisions of a UCC on personal matters may run contrary to scriptures and cultural doctrines in a religion.

3. Exemption for Tribal Population: The four States that have enacted UCC have exempted tribal population from its ambit. The reasons for such exemption are constitutional safeguards to protect tribal culture as well as the belief that many tribal customs in these matters provide adequate rights to women. However, exempting one section of society while making it compulsory for all other groups, including religious minorities, is discriminatory.

What Can Be the Way Forward?

The most important reason to reform civil laws is to ensure equal rights for women in matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, and inheritance. The right to religion under Article 25 is subject to constitutional morality and other fundamental rights, including equality. In Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (2024) case, the Supreme Court held that practices such as casteism and gender discrimination, which run against the spirit of the Constitution, would not receive protection under Article 29. Thus, reforms in personal laws should not be viewed as violating Articles 25 and 29, as they uphold women’s equality, an essential facet of constitutional morality.

However, there is resistance to the UCC among minorities, particularly Muslims. In the Constituent Assembly, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar advocated a UCC but suggested that it could remain voluntary. He said Parliament could provide for the UCC to apply to citizens who declare they are willing to be bound by it.

On the other hand, the Law Commission in its Consultation Paper on Reform of Family Law (2018) opined that a UCC was neither necessary nor desirable at this stage. It argued instead for reforming discriminatory provisions across personal laws. The emphasis should be on achieving ‘equality within communities’ between men and women rather than ‘equality between communities.’ The report recommends legislative reforms required in various personal laws with respect to marriage, divorce, custody, adoption, maintenance, succession and inheritance, that would ensure gender justice. The suggestions of the Law Commission should be considered while legislating and implementing reforms in personal laws.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Constitutional Status of the UCC

The article highlights that the UCC is a Directive Principle of State Policy (Article 44), which is non-justiciable. This means that it is not enforceable by any court. However, it is fundamental in the governance of the country, and the State is duty-bound to apply it while making laws.

2. The Conflict Between UCC and Fundamental Rights

The article notes that there can be potential conflict between the provisions of the UCC and guaranteed fundamental rights. Article 25 guarantees the freedom of religion, and Article 29 protects the cultural and educational rights of minorities. The article argues that the right to religion under Article 25 is subject to constitutional morality and other fundamental rights, including equality.

3. The Question of Gender Justice

The article argues that the most important reason to reform civil laws is to ensure equal rights for women in matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, and inheritance. A UCC would ensure equal rights for women across religions in matters governed by personal laws.

4. The Resistance from Minorities

The article notes that there is resistance to the UCC among minorities, particularly Muslims. In the Constituent Assembly, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar advocated a UCC but suggested that it could remain voluntary.

5. The Law Commission’s Recommendations

The article highlights that the Law Commission in its Consultation Paper on Reform of Family Law (2018) opined that a UCC was neither necessary nor desirable at this stage. It argued instead for reforming discriminatory provisions across personal laws, with an emphasis on achieving ‘equality within communities’ between men and women.

6. The Exemption for Tribal Population

The article notes that the four States that have enacted UCC have exempted the tribal population from its ambit. The reasons for such exemption are constitutional safeguards to protect tribal culture. However, exempting one section of society while making it compulsory for all other groups is discriminatory.

Timeline of Events

• 1950: Article 44 (UCC) included in the Constitution as a Directive Principle.

• 1955-56: Hindu Marriage Act and Hindu Succession Act enacted.

• 1937: Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act enacted.

• 2012: Anand Marriage Act enacted for Sikhs.

• 2018: Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on Reform of Family Law recommends reforming discriminatory provisions across personal laws.

• 2024: Supreme Court judgment in Section 6A of the Citizenship Act case.

• January 2025: Uttarakhand UCC comes into force.

• Recent: UCC bills passed by Assam, Gujarat, and Madhya Pradesh await Presidential assent.

• Recent: Home Minister Amit Shah indicates UCC would be implemented in all 21 NDA-ruled States by 2029.

Government Response

• UCC Implementation: The government has indicated that the UCC would be implemented in all 21 NDA-ruled States by 2029.

• Uttarakhand UCC: Uttarakhand has had a UCC in force since January 2025.

• Other States: UCC bills passed by Assam, Gujarat, and Madhya Pradesh are awaiting Presidential assent.

Judicial Developments

• Shah Bano Case (1985): The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Shah Bano, a Muslim woman seeking maintenance from her husband, highlighting the need for a UCC.

• Sarla Mudgal Case (1995): The Supreme Court held that the second marriage of a Hindu husband after converting to Islam is void.

• Section 6A of the Citizenship Act Case (2024): The Supreme Court held that practices such as casteism and gender discrimination, which run against the spirit of the Constitution, would not receive protection under Article 29.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Article 44: Directive Principle of State Policy for a UCC.

• Article 25: Freedom of religion.

• Article 29: Protection of cultural and educational rights of minorities.

• Article 14: Equality before Law.

• Article 15: Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.

• Constitutional Morality: The article argues that reforms in personal laws should not be viewed as violating Articles 25 and 29, as they uphold women’s equality, an essential facet of constitutional morality.

Social and Political Significance

• Gender Justice: A UCC would ensure equal rights for women across religions.

• Secularism: A UCC would make India secular in the true sense.

• National Integration: A UCC would promote national integration.

• Minority Rights: There is resistance to the UCC among minorities, particularly Muslims.

• Political Polarization: The UCC is a politically sensitive issue that can polarize communities.

Challenges

1. Constitutional Conflict: Potential conflict between the UCC and fundamental rights.

2. Minority Resistance: Resistance to the UCC among minorities.

3. Cultural Diversity: India’s cultural and religious diversity makes it difficult to arrive at a common set of personal laws.

4. Tribal Exemption: Exempting one section of society while making it compulsory for all other groups is discriminatory.

5. Political Sensitivity: The UCC is a politically sensitive issue.

6. Lack of Consensus: There is no consensus among stakeholders on the content and scope of the UCC.

Way Forward

1. Reform Personal Laws: The Law Commission’s recommendation to reform discriminatory provisions across personal laws should be considered.

2. Achieve Equality Within Communities: The emphasis should be on achieving ‘equality within communities’ between men and women rather than ‘equality between communities.’

3. Voluntary UCC: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s suggestion that the UCC could remain voluntary should be considered.

4. Consultation: The government should consult all stakeholders, including religious minorities, before implementing the UCC.

5. Gender Justice: The most important reason to reform civil laws is to ensure equal rights for women.

6. Constitutional Morality: Reforms in personal laws should be guided by constitutional morality.

7. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize gender justice and constitutional morality.

Conclusion

The Uniform Civil Code debate is one of the most contentious issues in contemporary India. It involves fundamental questions about the relationship between religion and the state, the nature of secularism in India, the rights of minorities, and the quest for gender justice.

The article argues that the most important reason to reform civil laws is to ensure equal rights for women in matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, and inheritance. The right to religion under Article 25 is subject to constitutional morality and other fundamental rights, including equality. The Law Commission’s recommendation to reform discriminatory provisions across personal laws, with an emphasis on achieving ‘equality within communities’ between men and women, should be considered.

The way forward requires a nuanced understanding of both the constitutional and social dimensions of the UCC. It requires reforming personal laws, achieving equality within communities, considering a voluntary UCC, consulting all stakeholders, ensuring gender justice, and upholding constitutional morality.

The time for action is now. The future of India’s secularism and gender justice depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a Directive Principle of State Policy.” Discuss the constitutional status of the UCC and the debate surrounding its implementation.
Answer: The UCC is a Directive Principle of State Policy (Article 44), which is non-justiciable. This means that it is not enforceable by any court. However, it is fundamental in the governance of the country, and the State is duty-bound to apply it while making laws.
The Debate:

1. Arguments in Favour: It would make India secular in the true sense and ensure equal rights for women across religions.

2. Arguments Against: There can be potential conflict between the provisions of the UCC and guaranteed fundamental rights (Articles 25 and 29).

3. Law Commission’s View: The Law Commission in its Consultation Paper on Reform of Family Law (2018) opined that a UCC was neither necessary nor desirable at this stage. It argued instead for reforming discriminatory provisions across personal laws.
   The way forward requires reforming personal laws, achieving equality within communities, and upholding constitutional morality.

Q2. Discuss the conflict between the Uniform Civil Code and the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 25 and 29 of the Constitution.
Answer: The conflict between the UCC and Fundamental Rights is a key issue in the debate.

1. Article 25: Guarantees every person a fundamental right to practise a religion of one’s choice.

2. Article 29: Provides a fundamental right to any section of citizens to conserve their distinct culture.
   The Conflict:
   The provisions of a UCC on personal matters may run contrary to scriptures and cultural doctrines in a religion. However, the article argues that the right to religion under Article 25 is subject to constitutional morality and other fundamental rights, including equality. In Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (2024) case, the Supreme Court held that practices such as casteism and gender discrimination, which run against the spirit of the Constitution, would not receive protection under Article 29.
   Way Forward:
   Reforms in personal laws should not be viewed as violating Articles 25 and 29, as they uphold women’s equality, an essential facet of constitutional morality.

Q3. “The most important reason to reform civil laws is to ensure equal rights for women.” Critically examine this statement in the context of the UCC debate.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The most important reason to reform civil laws is to ensure equal rights for women in matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, and inheritance. A UCC would ensure equal rights for women across religions in matters governed by personal laws.
Key Issues:

1. Gender Justice: A UCC would ensure equal rights for women across religions.

2. Discriminatory Provisions: The Law Commission’s report recommends legislative reforms required in various personal laws with respect to marriage, divorce, custody, adoption, maintenance, succession and inheritance, that would ensure gender justice.

3. Equality Within Communities: The emphasis should be on achieving ‘equality within communities’ between men and women rather than ‘equality between communities.’
   The way forward requires reforming personal laws to ensure gender justice.

Q4. What are the arguments for and against the Uniform Civil Code? Suggest a way forward.
Answer: The arguments for the UCC are:

1. True Secularism: It would make India secular in the true sense.

2. Gender Justice: A UCC would ensure equal rights for women across religions.
   The arguments against the UCC are:

3. Conflict with Fundamental Rights: Potential conflict with Articles 25 and 29.

4. Contrary to Scriptures: Provisions may run contrary to scriptures and cultural doctrines.

5. Exemption for Tribal Population: Exempting one section of society while making it compulsory for all other groups is discriminatory.
   Way Forward:

6. Reform Personal Laws: The Law Commission’s recommendation to reform discriminatory provisions across personal laws should be considered.

7. Achieve Equality Within Communities: The emphasis should be on achieving ‘equality within communities’ between men and women.

8. Voluntary UCC: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s suggestion that the UCC could remain voluntary should be considered.

9. Consultation: The government should consult all stakeholders, including religious minorities.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to achieve gender justice through personal law reforms.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy for India to achieve gender justice through personal law reforms must include:

1. Reform Personal Laws: The Law Commission’s recommendation to reform discriminatory provisions across personal laws should be considered.

2. Achieve Equality Within Communities: The emphasis should be on achieving ‘equality within communities’ between men and women rather than ‘equality between communities.’

3. Voluntary UCC: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s suggestion that the UCC could remain voluntary should be considered.

4. Consultation: The government should consult all stakeholders, including religious minorities.

5. Gender Justice: The most important reason to reform civil laws is to ensure equal rights for women.

6. Constitutional Morality: Reforms in personal laws should be guided by constitutional morality.

7. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize gender justice and constitutional morality.
   The time for action is now. The future of India’s secularism and gender justice depends on the choices made today.

The Hague’s Verdict on Hashim Thaci: Justice, History, and the Unresolved Question of Kosovo

Why in News?

Hashim Thaci, the former President of Kosovo, has been sentenced to 25 years in prison after being found guilty of war crimes by a special European Union-backed court at The Hague. The trial found him guilty of war crimes including murder, arbitrary detention, illegal arrests, torture, etc., during the Kosovo war in the late 1990s as a senior commander of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). Three other former KLA commanders were also sentenced for different charges. The verdict has been met with outrage and tears in Kosovo, where Thaci is still seen as a revolutionary figure, while Serbia has welcomed the judgment. This development brings the complex and unresolved question of Kosovo’s statehood and the legacy of the Balkan wars back into international focus.

Introduction

The sentencing of Hashim Thaci by the Kosovo Specialist Chambers at The Hague marks a significant moment in the long and painful history of the Balkans. It is a verdict that seeks to deliver justice for the victims of the Kosovo War (1998-1999) but also serves as a stark reminder of the deep ethnic and political divisions that continue to define the region. The trial, which was heard by the European Union-backed Kosovo Specialist Chambers, a special tribunal court constituted in The Hague in 2016, focused on the crimes committed by the KLA during the period of insurgency and subsequent war.

The verdict has been received in radically different ways by the two main parties to the conflict. For the ethnic Albanian majority in Kosovo, Thaci is a hero who led the fight for independence. For Serbia, the verdict is a “warning” that a “fake state cannot be built on mass graves of murdered Serbs.” This article analyses the background of the conflict, the key issues raised by the trial, the constitutional and governance dimensions, and the implications for the future of Kosovo and the wider Balkan region.

Background

The Historical Context: The Breakup of Yugoslavia

Kosovo was once part of the erstwhile Republic of Yugoslavia. After the Second World War, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was reconstituted as the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia under the leadership of Josip Broz Tito. While Tito was able to unify the multiple republics, including Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Macedonia, and the autonomous provinces of Kosovo and Vojvodina, under a centralised government, the system came under pressure after his death. Multiple factors, including divisions between the republics, rising nationalist movements, economic pressures, and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, contributed to Yugoslavia’s eventual dissolution in 2003.

One of the primary nationalist trends that spearheaded Yugoslavia’s dissolution was the Serbian nationalist movement led by Slobodan Milošević in the late 1980s. Riding on Serbian nationalist tendencies, Milošević pushed through policies that stripped other republics and provinces, such as Kosovo, of their autonomy. He also brought in policies that were discriminatory in nature against Albanians.

The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) and the Kosovo War

The KLA was formed in this atmosphere to fight for the independence of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, then a province within Serbia. The KLA led an insurgency against the Yugoslav state, attacking Serbian government buildings and police stations. This eventually led to an all-out war in 1998-1999, with the Serbian-controlled federal republic brutally cracking down on the KLA. The war led to the displacement of thousands of people and the death of nearly 13,000 people, mostly ethnic Albanians. The war finally ended with the intervention of NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization), which carried out air raids and bombardments against Serbian targets, which forced the federal republic to end hostilities and move out of Kosovo. NATO subsequently deployed peacekeeping forces to the region.

Milošević eventually stood trial for his crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes committed during the Yugoslav Wars of the 1990s, in The Hague in 2002. However, he died in prison before a judgment was reached.

The Road to Independence and the Specialist Chambers

In 2008, Kosovo declared independence from Serbia and was recognised by the U.S. and several other European nations. However, Serbia does not recognise Kosovo as an independent nation and still considers it a part of itself even though it has no administrative control over it. It is still not a member state of the UN. India also does not recognise Kosovo as an independent nation.

The need for such a tribunal arose after Swiss politician Dick Marty authored a Council of Europe report, known as the Marty report, in 2010, which alleged that the KLA placed many Serbians in secret detention centres where they were subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, before ultimately “disappearing”. Of particular note was the allegation that the KLA had harvested the organs of such prisoners to sell them in the international market.

The report, in effect, coloured the larger imagination of the KLA and the Kosovo independence movement. The narrative changed from the KLA being seen as a champion of self-determination to an inhumane militia which had committed human rights abuses against Serbian nationals.

The Trial and the Verdict

At least 15 people have been charged by the Chambers, with Thaci being the most senior figure. Charges were brought against him in 2020, when he was President of Kosovo, following which he had to resign and stand trial as an ordinary citizen. The central question before the court was to understand the extent of the commanders’ control over the KLA and whether the crimes amounted to a pattern of abuse. Finally, presiding judge Charles Smith stated that Thaci had “actively participated in and encouraged crimes,” adding that “the scale and nature of the crimes committed were very serious”. However, the judge insisted that the trial was “not about the legitimacy of the Kosovo Liberation Army” or its ultimate goal of securing independence for Kosovo.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Complexity of Justice in Post-Conflict Societies

The article highlights the complexity of delivering justice in post-conflict societies. The KLA was seen by many ethnic Albanians as a liberation army fighting for independence. However, the Marty report and the subsequent trial revealed a darker side, including allegations of secret detention centres, inhuman treatment, and organ harvesting. The trial sought to hold individuals accountable for their crimes, but it also raised questions about the legitimacy of the KLA’s struggle and the narrative of Kosovo’s independence movement.

2. The Question of Kosovo’s Statehood

The verdict has reignited the debate over Kosovo’s statehood. Kosovo declared independence from Serbia in 2008 and is recognised by the U.S. and several other European nations. However, Serbia does not recognise Kosovo as an independent nation, and neither does India, nor is Kosovo a member of the UN. The verdict has been welcomed by Serbia as a “warning” that a “fake state cannot be built on mass graves of murdered Serbs.”

3. The Role of International Tribunals

The article highlights the role of international tribunals in delivering justice for war crimes. The Kosovo Specialist Chambers, a special tribunal court constituted in The Hague in 2016, was set up to hear the crimes committed by the KLA. The trial of Thaci and other KLA commanders is a significant test of the international community’s commitment to accountability and the rule of law.

4. The Politics of Memory and Identity

The verdict has been met with outrage and tears in Kosovo, where Thaci is still seen as a revolutionary figure. This highlights the politics of memory and identity in post-conflict societies. For many ethnic Albanians, Thaci is a hero who led the fight for independence. For Serbia, he is a war criminal. The verdict has deepened the divisions between the two communities.

5. The Right to Appeal

Thaci and the three other commanders have the right to appeal the decision. The appeals process will be closely watched by both Kosovo and Serbia, as well as the international community.

Timeline of Events

• 1980s: Slobodan Milošević rises to power in Serbia, pushing nationalist policies that strip Kosovo of its autonomy.

• 1990s: The KLA is formed to fight for the independence of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo.

• 1998-1999: The Kosovo War leads to the displacement of thousands and the death of nearly 13,000 people.

• 1999: NATO intervenes with air raids against Serbian targets, forcing the federal republic to end hostilities.

• 2002: Milošević stands trial for crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes in The Hague. He dies in prison before a judgment is reached.

• 2008: Kosovo declares independence from Serbia.

• 2010: The Marty report alleges that the KLA placed Serbians in secret detention centres and harvested organs.

• 2016: The Kosovo Specialist Chambers is constituted in The Hague.

• 2020: Thaci is charged with war crimes and resigns as President of Kosovo.

• Recent: Thaci is sentenced to 25 years in prison.

Government Response

• Kosovo: Kosovo’s Prime Minister Albin Kurti said the verdict was “a travesty of justice.” People who had poured into the streets of Pristina, the capital of Kosovo, to hear the verdict were shocked and shouted slogans in support of the KLA and Thaci.

• Serbia: Serbia’s side has welcomed the judgment. Serbia’s Deputy Prime Minister Ivica Dacic called the verdicts a “warning” to Pristina “that a fake state cannot be built on mass graves of murdered Serbs.”

• India: India does not recognise Kosovo as an independent nation.

Judicial Developments

• The Trial: The trial was heard by the European Union-backed Kosovo Specialist Chambers, a special tribunal court constituted in The Hague in 2016.

• The Verdict: Presiding judge Charles Smith stated that Thaci had “actively participated in and encouraged crimes,” adding that “the scale and nature of the crimes committed were very serious.”

• The Right to Appeal: Thaci and the three other commanders have the right to appeal the decision.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Statehood and Sovereignty: The verdict raises questions about Kosovo’s statehood and sovereignty. Serbia does not recognise Kosovo as an independent nation, and neither does India.

• International Law: The trial is a significant test of international law and the ability of international tribunals to deliver justice for war crimes.

• Rule of Law: The verdict reinforces the principle that individuals can be held accountable for war crimes, regardless of their position or popularity.

• Governance: The verdict has implications for governance in Kosovo and Serbia, and for the stability of the wider Balkan region.

Social and Political Significance

• Ethnic Divisions: The verdict has deepened the ethnic divisions between ethnic Albanians and Serbs.

• Politics of Memory: The verdict has reignited the politics of memory and identity in the Balkans.

• Nationalism: The verdict has been met with outrage in Kosovo, where Thaci is seen as a hero, and with welcome in Serbia, where he is seen as a war criminal.

• International Relations: The verdict has implications for international relations, particularly between Kosovo, Serbia, the EU, and the U.S.

Challenges

1. Reconciliation: The verdict has deepened the divisions between ethnic Albanians and Serbs, making reconciliation more difficult.

2. Statehood: The verdict has reignited the debate over Kosovo’s statehood.

3. International Law: The trial is a significant test of international law and the ability of international tribunals to deliver justice.

4. Politics of Memory: The verdict has reignited the politics of memory and identity in the Balkans.

5. Appeals: The appeals process will be closely watched by both Kosovo and Serbia.

Way Forward

1. Justice and Accountability: The international community must continue to support the work of international tribunals in delivering justice for war crimes.

2. Reconciliation: Efforts must be made to promote reconciliation between ethnic Albanians and Serbs.

3. Dialogue: Kosovo and Serbia must engage in dialogue to resolve their differences.

4. International Cooperation: The international community must work together to promote stability in the Balkans.

5. Rule of Law: The verdict reinforces the principle that individuals can be held accountable for war crimes.

6. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize justice and reconciliation.

Conclusion

The sentencing of Hashim Thaci by The Hague is a significant moment in the long and painful history of the Balkans. It is a verdict that seeks to deliver justice for the victims of the Kosovo War but also serves as a stark reminder of the deep ethnic and political divisions that continue to define the region.

The verdict has been received in radically different ways by the two main parties to the conflict. For the ethnic Albanian majority in Kosovo, Thaci is a hero. For Serbia, the verdict is a “warning” that a “fake state cannot be built on mass graves of murdered Serbs.”

The way forward requires a nuanced understanding of both the legal and political dimensions of the verdict. It requires justice and accountability, reconciliation, dialogue, international cooperation, the rule of law, and political will.

The time for action is now. The future of Kosovo and the stability of the Balkans depend on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “Why was ex-Kosovo President convicted by The Hague?” Discuss the role of Hashim Thaci in the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) and the crimes he was convicted of.
Answer: Hashim Thaci, the former President of Kosovo, was sentenced to 25 years in prison after being found guilty of war crimes by a special European Union-backed court at The Hague. The trial found him guilty of war crimes including murder, arbitrary detention, illegal arrests, torture, etc., during the Kosovo war in the late 1990s as a senior commander of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA).
Role of Thaci in the KLA:

1. Former Commander: Thaci was a former commander of the KLA, a militant ethnic Albanian force formed in the early 1990s, which strove for the independence of Kosovo.

2. Insurgency: The KLA led an insurgency against the Yugoslav state, attacking Serbian government buildings and police stations.

3. Control: The central question before the court was to understand the extent of the commanders’ control over the KLA and whether the crimes amounted to a pattern of abuse.
   The Verdict:
   Presiding judge Charles Smith stated that Thaci had “actively participated in and encouraged crimes,” adding that “the scale and nature of the crimes committed were very serious.”

Q2. Discuss the historical context of the Kosovo War. What was the role of NATO in ending the conflict?
Answer: Kosovo was once part of the erstwhile Republic of Yugoslavia. After the Second World War, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was reconstituted as the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia under the leadership of Josip Broz Tito. While Tito was able to unify the multiple republics, the system came under pressure after his death.
Historical Context:

1. Rise of Nationalism: One of the primary nationalist trends that spearheaded Yugoslavia’s dissolution was the Serbian nationalist movement led by Slobodan Milošević in the late 1980s.

2. Discriminatory Policies: Milošević pushed through policies that stripped other republics and provinces, such as Kosovo, of their autonomy. He also brought in policies that were discriminatory in nature against Albanians.

3. KLA Insurgency: The KLA was formed to fight for the independence of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, then a province within Serbia.

4. Kosovo War (1998-1999): The KLA led an insurgency against the Yugoslav state, which eventually led to an all-out war in 1998-1999.
   Role of NATO:
   The war finally ended with the intervention of NATO, which carried out air raids and bombardments against Serbian targets, which forced the federal republic to end hostilities and move out of Kosovo. NATO subsequently deployed peacekeeping forces to the region.

Q3. What was the Marty report? How did it change the narrative of the Kosovo Liberation Army?
Answer: The Marty report was authored by Swiss politician Dick Marty for the Council of Europe in 2010. It alleged that the KLA placed many Serbians in secret detention centres where they were subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, before ultimately “disappearing”. Of particular note was the allegation that the KLA had harvested the organs of such prisoners to sell them in the international market.
Change in Narrative:
The report, in effect, coloured the larger imagination of the KLA and the Kosovo independence movement. The narrative changed from the KLA being seen as a champion of self-determination to an inhumane militia which had committed human rights abuses against Serbian nationals. The need for such a tribunal arose after this report, leading to the constitution of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers in The Hague in 2016.

Q4. How has the verdict been received in Kosovo and Serbia? Discuss the implications for reconciliation in the Balkans.
Answer: The verdict has been received in radically different ways by the two main parties to the conflict.
Kosovo:

1. Outrage: In Kosovo, where Thaci is still seen as a revolutionary figure, the verdict was met with outrage and tears.

2. Travesty of Justice: Kosovo’s Prime Minister Albin Kurti said the verdict was “a travesty of justice.”

3. Protests: People who had poured into the streets of Pristina, the capital of Kosovo, to hear the verdict were shocked and shouted slogans in support of the KLA and Thaci.
   Serbia:

4. Welcome: Serbia’s side has welcomed the judgment.

5. Warning: Serbia’s Deputy Prime Minister Ivica Dacic called the verdicts a “warning” to Pristina “that a fake state cannot be built on mass graves of murdered Serbs.”
   Implications for Reconciliation:
   The verdict has deepened the divisions between ethnic Albanians and Serbs, making reconciliation more difficult. The politics of memory and identity in the Balkans have been reignited.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for the international community to promote justice and reconciliation in the Balkans.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy for the international community to promote justice and reconciliation in the Balkans must include:

1. Justice and Accountability: The international community must continue to support the work of international tribunals in delivering justice for war crimes.

2. Reconciliation: Efforts must be made to promote reconciliation between ethnic Albanians and Serbs.

3. Dialogue: Kosovo and Serbia must engage in dialogue to resolve their differences.

4. International Cooperation: The international community must work together to promote stability in the Balkans.

5. Rule of Law: The verdict reinforces the principle that individuals can be held accountable for war crimes.

6. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize justice and reconciliation.
   The time for action is now. The future of Kosovo and the stability of the Balkans depend on the choices made today.

Who Pays the Piper? Decoding the MDR on UPI and the Future of Digital Payments in India

Why in News?

After much speculation and debate, the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has finally released its circular about the additional charges it will allow to be levied on certain UPI payments from October 15. While the Opposition has argued that this charge will increase prices for consumers, the government has argued that this will not happen, and that the impact on merchants will be minimal. The article by T.C.A. Sharad Raghavan provides a detailed analysis of who will pay the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR), who will not, and who stands to gain the most from this significant policy shift. The move marks a fundamental change in the economics of India’s most successful digital public infrastructure, which has thus far been built on a zero-MDR model.

Introduction

The Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has been a revolutionary success story, transforming the way Indians transact and making digital payments a part of everyday life. A key factor in its phenomenal adoption has been the zero-MDR model, which made digital transactions free for both consumers and merchants, with the government subsidizing the costs. The recent NPCI circular, which introduces an MDR on certain transactions, marks a significant policy shift.

This article analyses the new MDR framework, the rationale behind it, the various exemptions and caps, and the stakeholders who stand to gain or lose. It examines the key issues, the constitutional and governance dimensions, and the way forward for India’s digital payments ecosystem.

Background

What is MDR and Who Will Pay?

Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) is a fee for using UPI that will be paid by merchants to payment processors and banks. Consumers will not have to directly pay the MDR.

In its press release relating to the NPCI’s announcement, the Ministry of Finance on September 15 emphasised that banks have been advised to ensure that merchants do not pass MDR charges on to customers and that UPI application providers are expressly prohibited from imposing platform fees or hidden charges on users.

The MDR will have to be paid by mid-to large-sized merchants who receive UPI payments in excess of ₹2,000 per transaction. These merchants will have to pay a charge of 0.4%. For transactions of ₹75,000 and above, the MDR will be capped at ₹300 per transaction.

The Exemptions and Concessions

However, the rules change when it comes to essential sectors. Transactions of ₹2,000 or more in essential and thin-margin sectors, such as railways, telecommunications, insurance, fuel, and agricultural inputs, will attract a flat MDR of ₹5 per transaction. According to the government, this flat charge will provide cost certainty for critical public services and businesses operating on narrow margins.

Further, capital market transactions such as payments to mutual funds, stockbrokers, dealers, and for equities will attract an MDR of 0.02%, capped at ₹300 per transaction. This lower rate, the government has argued, is aimed at supporting retail participation in formal financial markets.

Who Will Not Have to Pay?

All Person-to-Person (P2P) transactions will remain free of charge, regardless of the amount being transferred. The government has specified that “no transaction fee, platform fee or other charge may be imposed on individuals for sending or receiving money through UPI”. This is a significant exemption because P2P UPI transactions make up about 37% of the total UPI transaction volume.

Further, payments to merchants up to ₹2,000 will remain free of MDR. This makes up another 60.5% of all UPI transactions by volume. That means, in total, 97.5% of all UPI transactions will remain free.

In addition, the NPCI has mandated that small merchants, including street vendors receiving up to ₹1 lakh per month through UPI QR codes under the Person-to-Merchant (P2M) category, will also be exempt from MDR.

This means that the proportion of UPI payments that will attract a charge is actually even smaller than 2.5%.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Rationale for Introducing MDR

The article outlines the government’s rationale for introducing MDR:

• Cost Recovery: The MDR is intended to recover a portion of the costs incurred by banks and payment service providers in processing UPI transactions.

• Sustainability: The zero-MDR model was subsidized by the government. Introducing MDR is seen as a way to make the digital payments ecosystem more sustainable in the long run.

• Supporting Critical Services: The flat MDR of ₹5 for essential sectors provides cost certainty for critical public services and businesses operating on narrow margins.

• Retail Participation: The lower MDR for capital market transactions is aimed at supporting retail participation in formal financial markets.

2. The Impact on Merchants

The article analyses the impact of MDR on merchants:

• Mid-to-Large Merchants: These merchants will have to pay a charge of 0.4% on transactions above ₹2,000. For transactions of ₹75,000 and above, the MDR is capped at ₹300 per transaction.

• Small Merchants: Small merchants, including street vendors receiving up to ₹1 lakh per month, are exempt from MDR.

• Compliance Burden: The article notes that the rules are not clear on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold. This could increase the compliance burden on small merchants.

3. The Impact on Consumers

The article notes that consumers will not have to directly pay the MDR. The Ministry of Finance has emphasised that banks have been advised to ensure that merchants do not pass MDR charges on to customers and that UPI application providers are expressly prohibited from imposing platform fees or hidden charges on users. However, the article notes that it is not clear how banks are expected to check whether merchants tweak their prices to absorb this additional charge.

4. Who Stands to Gain the Most?

The article analyses the distribution of the MDR among payment ecosystem participants:

• Banks: The bulk of the charge (about 40% of what is collected) goes to the payer’s bank since it holds the customer’s bank account and bears the core authorisation, security, and settlement costs of the transaction. Yes Bank is the undisputed gainer, since it is the payer bank in more than 50% of all UPI transactions. The second largest is ICICI Bank at 18.3%. Of the MDR collected, the merchant’s bank or receiving bank receives 30%.

• UPI Apps: Another 20% of the MDR goes to the UPI app or Third-Party Application Provider (TPAP). PhonePe and Google Pay stand to benefit from this, since PhonePe accounts for about 46% of UPI transactions by volume and Google Pay another 32%.

• Payment Service Providers: The final 10% of the MDR goes to the Payment Service Provider that connects the technology partner bank that connects the UPI application to the central network switches.

5. The Total Revenue from MDR

The article estimates the total revenue from MDR:

• The analysis of the NPCI data shows that the P2M transactions above ₹2,000 make up 20% of all UPI transactions by value.

• That is, while ₹29.8 lakh crore was transacted over UPI in August 2026, P2M transactions above ₹2,000 were ₹5.99 lakh crore. This means that the absolute maximum that banks and payment processors can earn from MDR is about ₹2,400 crore a month (0.4% of ₹5.99 lakh crore) or ₹28,000 crore a year.

• However, since there are multiple caveats, exemptions, flat rates, and caps imposed, the total amount receivable will be lower than this.

6. The Dedicated Fund

The article notes that the government has also said that a dedicated fund will be established to promote UPI adoption among small merchants, with an amount equivalent to 5% of total MDR collections contributed to this fund. It does not specify from which of the payment system players this 5% will be taken.

Timeline of Events

• August 2026: ₹29.8 lakh crore was transacted over UPI.

• September 15: Ministry of Finance issues a press release emphasising that banks have been advised to ensure that merchants do not pass MDR charges on to customers.

• October 15: New MDR rates come into effect.

• Recent: NPCI releases its circular about the additional charges.

Government Response

• Ministry of Finance: The Ministry of Finance on September 15 emphasised that banks have been advised to ensure that merchants do not pass MDR charges on to customers and that UPI application providers are expressly prohibited from imposing platform fees or hidden charges on users.

• Dedicated Fund: The government has also said that a dedicated fund will be established to promote UPI adoption among small merchants, with an amount equivalent to 5% of total MDR collections contributed to this fund.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to the MDR on UPI.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Article 21 (Right to Life): The right to life includes the right to a decent standard of living. The MDR on UPI could impact the affordability of digital transactions.

• Financial Inclusion: The government has a responsibility to ensure financial inclusion for all. The MDR on UPI could impact the adoption of digital payments among small merchants and low-income users.

• Governance: The article highlights the need for a clear and transparent MDR structure.

• Digital India: The government’s Digital India initiative aims to bridge the digital divide. The MDR on UPI is a key component of this initiative.

Social and Political Significance

• Digital Economy: The MDR on UPI could impact the adoption of digital payments in India.

• Small Merchants: The complexity of the rules could increase the compliance burden on small merchants.

• Consumers: The MDR on UPI could lead to higher prices for consumers if merchants pass on the charge.

• Political Sensitivity: The MDR on UPI is a politically sensitive issue.

• Market Concentration: The MDR on UPI could benefit large banks and UPI apps, leading to market concentration.

Challenges

1. Complexity: The MDR structure is overly complex.

2. Compliance Burden: The rules increase the compliance burden on small merchants.

3. Lack of Clarity: The rules are not clear on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

4. Pass-Through: It is not clear how banks are expected to check whether merchants tweak their prices to absorb this additional charge.

5. Market Concentration: The MDR on UPI could benefit large banks and UPI apps, leading to market concentration.

6. Impact on Adoption: The MDR on UPI could slow the adoption of digital payments in India.

Way Forward

1. Simplify the Structure: The government should simplify the MDR structure.

2. Reduce Compliance Burden: The government should reduce the compliance burden on small merchants.

3. Provide Clarity: The government should provide clarity on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

4. RBI Funding: There is still an argument to be made for the Reserve Bank of India to foot this bill from the vast surpluses it generates every year.

5. Monitor Impact: The government should monitor the impact of MDR on small merchants and consumers.

6. Promote Competition: The government should promote competition in the digital payments ecosystem.

7. Stakeholder Consultation: The government should consult all stakeholders, including merchants and consumers, before implementing the MDR.

Conclusion

The introduction of MDR on UPI marks a significant policy shift in India’s digital payments ecosystem. While the government has argued that the impact on merchants will be minimal and that consumers will not be affected, the complexity of the rules and the lack of clarity on several issues raise concerns.

The way forward requires a nuanced understanding of both the economic and social dimensions of the MDR. It requires simplifying the structure, reducing the compliance burden on small merchants, providing clarity, monitoring the impact, promoting competition, and consulting all stakeholders.

The time for action is now. The future of India’s digital payments ecosystem depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “Who has to pay MDR on UPI and who stands to gain the most?” Discuss the new MDR framework for UPI transactions in India.
Answer: The Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) is a fee for using UPI that will be paid by merchants to payment processors and banks. Consumers will not have to directly pay the MDR.
Who Has to Pay:

1. Mid-to-Large Merchants: These merchants will have to pay a charge of 0.4% on transactions above ₹2,000. For transactions of ₹75,000 and above, the MDR is capped at ₹300 per transaction.

2. Essential Sectors: Transactions of ₹2,000 or more in essential and thin-margin sectors, such as railways, telecommunications, insurance, fuel, and agricultural inputs, will attract a flat MDR of ₹5 per transaction.

3. Capital Market Transactions: Payments to mutual funds, stockbrokers, dealers, and for equities will attract an MDR of 0.02%, capped at ₹300 per transaction.
   Who Will Not Have to Pay:

4. P2P Transactions: All Person-to-Person (P2P) transactions will remain free of charge.

5. Small Merchants: Small merchants, including street vendors receiving up to ₹1 lakh per month through UPI QR codes, will be exempt from MDR.

6. Payments up to ₹2,000: Payments to merchants up to ₹2,000 will remain free of MDR.
   Who Stands to Gain the Most:

7. Banks: The bulk of the charge (about 40%) goes to the payer’s bank. Yes Bank is the undisputed gainer, followed by ICICI Bank.

8. UPI Apps: Another 20% of the MDR goes to the UPI app or Third-Party Application Provider (TPAP). PhonePe and Google Pay stand to benefit.

9. Payment Service Providers: The final 10% of the MDR goes to the Payment Service Provider.

Q2. Discuss the rationale behind introducing MDR on UPI transactions. What are the key exemptions and concessions provided in the new framework?
Answer: The rationale behind introducing MDR on UPI transactions is:

1. Cost Recovery: The MDR is intended to recover a portion of the costs incurred by banks and payment service providers in processing UPI transactions.

2. Sustainability: The zero-MDR model was subsidized by the government. Introducing MDR is seen as a way to make the digital payments ecosystem more sustainable in the long run.

3. Supporting Critical Services: The flat MDR of ₹5 for essential sectors provides cost certainty for critical public services and businesses operating on narrow margins.

4. Retail Participation: The lower MDR for capital market transactions is aimed at supporting retail participation in formal financial markets.
   Key Exemptions and Concessions:

5. P2P Transactions: All Person-to-Person (P2P) transactions will remain free of charge.

6. Small Merchants: Small merchants, including street vendors receiving up to ₹1 lakh per month, are exempt from MDR.

7. Payments up to ₹2,000: Payments to merchants up to ₹2,000 will remain free of MDR.

8. Essential Sectors: Transactions in essential sectors will attract a flat MDR of ₹5 per transaction.

9. Capital Market Transactions: Capital market transactions will attract an MDR of 0.02%, capped at ₹300 per transaction.

Q3. “The new MDR framework is overly complex and could increase the compliance burden on small merchants.” Critically examine this statement.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The new MDR framework is overly complex and could increase the compliance burden on small merchants.
Key Issues:

1. Complexity: The rules have created different gradations for small merchants, essential sectors, and capital market payments.

2. Compliance Burden: The rules are not clear on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

3. Lack of Clarity: The rules are not clear on how banks are expected to check whether merchants tweak their prices to absorb this additional charge.

4. Refusal to Accept UPI: In the short run, it will likely result in small merchants simply refusing to accept UPI until greater clarity emerges.
   The way forward requires simplifying the structure, reducing the compliance burden on small merchants, and providing clarity.

Q4. Who are the main beneficiaries of the MDR on UPI? Discuss the implications for market concentration in India’s digital payments ecosystem.
Answer: The main beneficiaries of the MDR on UPI are:

1. Banks: The bulk of the charge (about 40%) goes to the payer’s bank. Yes Bank is the undisputed gainer, followed by ICICI Bank.

2. UPI Apps: Another 20% of the MDR goes to the UPI app or Third-Party Application Provider (TPAP). PhonePe and Google Pay stand to benefit.

3. Payment Service Providers: The final 10% of the MDR goes to the Payment Service Provider.
   Implications for Market Concentration:

4. Dominance of Large Players: The MDR on UPI could benefit large banks and UPI apps, leading to market concentration.

5. Barriers to Entry: The complexity of the rules could create barriers to entry for new players.

6. Reduced Competition: Market concentration could lead to reduced competition and higher prices for consumers.
   The way forward requires promoting competition in the digital payments ecosystem.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to ensure the sustainability and inclusivity of its digital payments ecosystem.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy for India to ensure the sustainability and inclusivity of its digital payments ecosystem must include:

1. Simplify the Structure: The government should simplify the MDR structure.

2. Reduce Compliance Burden: The government should reduce the compliance burden on small merchants.

3. Provide Clarity: The government should provide clarity on what happens to a small merchant who crosses the ₹1 lakh a month turnover threshold.

4. RBI Funding: There is still an argument to be made for the Reserve Bank of India to foot this bill from the vast surpluses it generates every year.

5. Monitor Impact: The government should monitor the impact of MDR on small merchants and consumers.

6. Promote Competition: The government should promote competition in the digital payments ecosystem.

7. Stakeholder Consultation: The government should consult all stakeholders, including merchants and consumers, before implementing the MDR.

8. Financial Inclusion: The government should ensure that the MDR does not hamper financial inclusion.
   The time for action is now. The future of India’s digital payments ecosystem depends on the choices made today.

The Data Imperative: Why India Must Release the 2017-18 Consumption Survey

Why in News?

A recent opinion piece by Surjit S. Bhalla, a former member of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council and Chairman of the Technical Expert Group for the first official Household Income Survey of India, has reignited a critical debate about the transparency and credibility of India’s statistical system. The article, titled “Release 2017-18 consumption data, put all doubt to rest,” argues that the government’s continued suppression of the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) data is a grave mistake that is undermining the credibility of India’s statistical apparatus. The author contends that the data, which reportedly showed a decline in real mean consumption levels, must be released to put all doubts to rest and to uphold the integrity of India’s statistical system.

Introduction

In the world of evidence-based policymaking, data is the lifeblood of governance. The accuracy, credibility, and transparency of national statistics are fundamental to understanding the state of the economy, formulating effective policies, and ensuring accountability. India has a rich tradition of statistical excellence, pioneering household surveys and poverty measurement. However, in recent years, concerns have been raised about the credibility of India’s statistical system, particularly regarding the delay in releasing the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) data.

The article by Surjit S. Bhalla argues that the government’s decision to withhold this data is a significant mistake. The “unintended consequences of censorship” are evident, as the absence of official data has led to a vacuum filled by speculation, doubt, and political opportunism. This article analyses the key issues raised, the constitutional and governance dimensions, and the way forward for restoring the credibility of India’s statistical system.

Background

India’s Statistical Tradition

India has been a pioneer in world statistical surveys and has not worried about survey consumption ranging between 55 and 60 per cent of consumption estimated via national accounts. India was the first country to outline poverty measurement. The World Bank’s famous dollar-a-day poverty line was the Indian poverty line! The first household panel survey was conducted by NCAER, the Additional Rural Incomes Survey, 1968-69 to 1970-71; an honour shared with the University of Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics, which conducted the first panel in 1968. South Asian countries like Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh have been conducting income distribution surveys for years, and India has finally joined the world in this endeavour.

The 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey

Given the dissection and healthy criticism of Indian data, it is important to point out the overwhelmingly unhealthy analysis, let alone criticism, of one of the most successful development transitions in history — China. The author has published and discussed the “fact” that China has shown the fastest-ever poverty reduction over the last 25 years. But how many have asked how China obtains this result? And how do the World Bank and IMF treat and analyse Chinese data on poverty? They don’t. They accept at face value what China provides via declines of income and consumption, for rural and urban China. What analysis? China conducts household surveys like India does. But no unit-level data has ever been released to the public. The author’s understanding is that China provides four excel files, one each for consumption and income, rural and urban. There are 12 observations in each file — the 10 deciles and possibly the 5 per cent and 95 per cent mean levels. On that basis, the world continues to applaud the Chinese poverty eradication miracle.

But nations living behind glass should not throw stones at those with steel veneers. One criticism of the Indian statistical apparatus is that it refuses to go away, precisely because it is unanimous, is this: Something happened to India’s statistics since 2014-15. Indian data started being officially censored. That is the primary reason why, despite world-class improvements (not perfection, but we are not a developed country yet), the efforts on the GDP data are, well, questioned.

The Censorship of Data

Examine the most widely known, and acknowledged, instance of censorship. After 2011-12, India undertook a consumption (and employment-unemployment) survey in 2017-18. There was no official report or data release of the 2017-18 consumption survey. After much reluctance, and internal debate, the 2017-18 employment survey was released (PLFS 2017-18). No such luck with the consumption survey. Why? Because the data showed (via leaked reports) that real mean consumption levels had declined by 3.7 per cent over the six-year period between 2011-12 and 2017-18; and rural consumption, where most of the poor are, declined by 8.8 per cent; urban per capita consumption rose by 2 per cent. There is a lesson from what the Indian government had previously done when survey “findings” were unpalatable. NSS consumption surveys had been on a five-year schedule since 1983. The 2009-10 consumption survey results were released in mid-July 2011. Because of the fear that there was a severe drought in 2009-10 (rainfall data did not confirm a drought) and the dampening effects of the Great Financial Crisis, the government had commissioned an unprecedented additional consumption survey for the agricultural year 2011-12 (July 2011 to June 2012). In other words, a new survey was already in the field when the results of the “old” survey were announced.

The Indian government had acted in the best, pioneering nature of the Indian statistical system. Be conservative (no income distribution surveys!) but do not ever censor data. The tragedy, and mistake, is deeper. I have participated in several analyses of Indian poverty data, including an analysis of what likely happened to consumption and poverty in 2017-18. In a 2019 article, co-authored with Karan Bhasin, we wrote: “It is important to release the unit-level data, if for no other reason than to let the world know just how bad the CES data is”. I have reiterated that view several times, privately and in print. No need to endorse the data — just release it. The “unintended” consequences of that censorship have become evident since then: No matter how good the data produced in India, there will always be a doubt, one that is exploited by political opponents. There is an easy no-cost solution to this data and credibility crisis — in the name of god, release the unit-level 2017-18 consumption data.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Credibility Crisis in India’s Statistical System

The article argues that the government’s refusal to release the 2017-18 consumption survey data has led to a credibility crisis in India’s statistical system. The absence of official data has created a vacuum filled by speculation and doubt. This has undermined the credibility of other data, including the GDP data, and has provided ammunition to political opponents.

2. The Unintended Consequences of Censorship

The article highlights the “unintended consequences of censorship.” The suppression of data does not make the problem go away; it only creates more doubt and speculation. The author argues that no matter how good the data produced in India is, there will always be a doubt as long as the 2017-18 data is withheld.

3. The Precedent of Data Suppression

The article notes that the suppression of the 2017-18 consumption survey is not an isolated incident. It is part of a broader pattern of data suppression that has emerged since 2014-15. The author argues that Indian data started being officially censored during this period.

4. The Comparison with China

The article compares India’s statistical transparency with that of China. It notes that China provides only four excel files with 12 observations each, and yet the world continues to applaud the Chinese poverty eradication miracle. The author argues that India, which has a much more transparent statistical system, should not be afraid to release its data.

5. The Need for Transparency

The article argues that the government must release the unit-level 2017-18 consumption data. There is no need to endorse the data — just release it. This would put all doubts to rest and restore the credibility of India’s statistical system.

Timeline of Events

• 1968-69 to 1970-71: First household panel survey conducted by NCAER.

• 1983: NSS consumption surveys begin on a five-year schedule.

• 2009-10: Consumption survey conducted; results released in mid-July 2011.

• 2011-12: Additional consumption survey commissioned for the agricultural year 2011-12.

• 2017-18: Consumption Expenditure Survey conducted; data not released.

• 2019: Article by Surjit S. Bhalla and Karan Bhasin argues for the release of the data.

• Recent: Surjit S. Bhalla reiterates his call for the release of the 2017-18 consumption data.

Government Response

The article critiques the government’s response to the data credibility crisis. It argues that the government has been reluctant to release the data because it showed a decline in real mean consumption levels. The author argues that the government must act in the best, pioneering nature of the Indian statistical system: be conservative but do not ever censor data.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to the release of the 2017-18 consumption data.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Article 21 (Right to Life): The right to life includes the right to a decent standard of living. Accurate data on consumption and poverty is essential for ensuring this right.

• Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP): Article 38 directs the state to promote the welfare of the people. Accurate data is essential for formulating effective policies for welfare.

• Governance: The article highlights the need for transparency and accountability in governance.

• Federalism: The release of data is a central government responsibility.

• Statistical System: The article argues that the credibility of India’s statistical system is at stake.

Social and Political Significance

• Poverty and Inequality: The 2017-18 consumption data is crucial for understanding poverty and inequality in India.

• Policy Formulation: Accurate data is essential for formulating effective policies for poverty reduction and social welfare.

• Public Trust: The suppression of data undermines public trust in the government and its institutions.

• Political Polarization: The data credibility crisis has become a political issue, with opposition parties accusing the government of hiding inconvenient truths.

• International Reputation: The credibility crisis affects India’s international reputation as a transparent and accountable democracy.

Challenges

1. Political Sensitivity: The data is politically sensitive because it shows a decline in consumption levels.

2. Institutional Resistance: There may be institutional resistance to releasing the data.

3. Lack of Transparency: The government has been opaque about its reasons for withholding the data.

4. Erosion of Trust: The suppression of data has eroded public trust in the government’s statistical system.

5. International Scrutiny: The credibility crisis has attracted international scrutiny.

Way Forward

1. Release the Data: The government must release the unit-level 2017-18 consumption data immediately.

2. Transparency: The government must be transparent about its statistical methodology and data collection processes.

3. Institutional Reform: The government should strengthen the independence and autonomy of statistical institutions.

4. Public Dialogue: The government should engage in a public dialogue about the data and its implications.

5. International Cooperation: The government should work with international organizations to improve its statistical system.

6. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize transparency and accountability.

Conclusion

The article by Surjit S. Bhalla is a timely and powerful call for transparency in India’s statistical system. The government’s refusal to release the 2017-18 consumption survey data is a grave mistake that has undermined the credibility of India’s statistical apparatus.

The way forward requires a fundamental shift in the government’s approach to data. It requires releasing the data, being transparent about methodology, strengthening statistical institutions, engaging in public dialogue, and fostering international cooperation.

The time for action is now. The credibility of India’s statistical system and the integrity of its governance depend on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “The government’s refusal to release the 2017-18 consumption survey data has led to a credibility crisis in India’s statistical system.” Critically examine this statement.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The government’s refusal to release the 2017-18 consumption survey data has led to a credibility crisis in India’s statistical system. The absence of official data has created a vacuum filled by speculation and doubt. This has undermined the credibility of other data, including the GDP data, and has provided ammunition to political opponents.
Key Issues:

1. Unintended Consequences of Censorship: The suppression of data does not make the problem go away; it only creates more doubt and speculation.

2. Precedent of Data Suppression: The suppression of the 2017-18 consumption survey is part of a broader pattern of data suppression that has emerged since 2014-15.

3. Comparison with China: India, which has a much more transparent statistical system, should not be afraid to release its data.
   The way forward requires releasing the data, being transparent about methodology, and strengthening statistical institutions.

Q2. Discuss the “unintended consequences of censorship” in the context of India’s statistical system.
Answer: The “unintended consequences of censorship” are evident in India’s statistical system. The suppression of data does not make the problem go away; it only creates more doubt and speculation.
Key Issues:

1. Erosion of Trust: The suppression of data has eroded public trust in the government’s statistical system.

2. Political Polarization: The data credibility crisis has become a political issue, with opposition parties accusing the government of hiding inconvenient truths.

3. International Reputation: The credibility crisis affects India’s international reputation as a transparent and accountable democracy.

4. Policy Paralysis: The absence of accurate data hampers effective policymaking.
   The way forward requires releasing the data, being transparent about methodology, and strengthening statistical institutions.

Q3. “India has a rich tradition of statistical excellence.” Discuss this statement in the context of India’s pioneering role in poverty measurement and household surveys.
Answer: The statement is accurate. India has a rich tradition of statistical excellence.
Pioneering Role:

1. First Country to Outline Poverty Measurement: India was the first country to outline poverty measurement.

2. World Bank’s Poverty Line: The World Bank’s famous dollar-a-day poverty line was the Indian poverty line!

3. First Household Panel Survey: The first household panel survey was conducted by NCAER, the Additional Rural Incomes Survey, 1968-69 to 1970-71.

4. NSS Surveys: NSS consumption surveys had been on a five-year schedule since 1983.
   Challenges:

5. Data Suppression: The suppression of the 2017-18 consumption survey data is a blot on India’s statistical tradition.

6. Credibility Crisis: The credibility crisis in India’s statistical system is a major challenge.
   The way forward requires releasing the data, being transparent about methodology, and strengthening statistical institutions.

Q4. What are the key challenges in ensuring transparency and credibility in India’s statistical system? Suggest measures to address these challenges.
Answer: The key challenges in ensuring transparency and credibility in India’s statistical system are:

1. Political Sensitivity: The data is politically sensitive because it shows a decline in consumption levels.

2. Institutional Resistance: There may be institutional resistance to releasing the data.

3. Lack of Transparency: The government has been opaque about its reasons for withholding the data.

4. Erosion of Trust: The suppression of data has eroded public trust in the government’s statistical system.

5. International Scrutiny: The credibility crisis has attracted international scrutiny.
   Measures to address these challenges:

6. Release the Data: The government must release the unit-level 2017-18 consumption data immediately.

7. Transparency: The government must be transparent about its statistical methodology and data collection processes.

8. Institutional Reform: The government should strengthen the independence and autonomy of statistical institutions.

9. Public Dialogue: The government should engage in a public dialogue about the data and its implications.

10. International Cooperation: The government should work with international organizations to improve its statistical system.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to restore the credibility of its statistical system.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy for India to restore the credibility of its statistical system must include:

1. Release the Data: The government must release the unit-level 2017-18 consumption data immediately.

2. Transparency: The government must be transparent about its statistical methodology and data collection processes.

3. Institutional Reform: The government should strengthen the independence and autonomy of statistical institutions.

4. Public Dialogue: The government should engage in a public dialogue about the data and its implications.

5. International Cooperation: The government should work with international organizations to improve its statistical system.

6. Political Will: The most crucial element is sustained political will to prioritize transparency and accountability.

7. Legal Framework: The government should consider enacting a law to ensure the independence and transparency of statistical institutions.
   The time for action is now. The credibility of India’s statistical system and the integrity of its governance depend on the choices made today.

Inflation, Politics of Greetings, and the Myth of the Parthenon: Navigating Economic, Social, and Intellectual Frontiers

Why in News?

Three significant and seemingly disparate developments have recently come to the forefront, highlighting critical challenges in economic policy, constitutional governance, and the pursuit of knowledge:

1. Global Inflation and Interest Rates: The US Federal Reserve has raised interest rates by 25 basis points, lifting the target range of the federal funds rate to 3.75 to 4 per cent. The rationale behind the decision, which all committee members supported, is straightforward—inflation remains uncomfortably high. This comes amid political pressure from US President Donald Trump for looser monetary policy. Central banks across the world are also tightening rates. The European Central Bank also hiked rates by 25 basis points as it sees inflation remaining “well above target for an extended period.” These decisions come only weeks ahead of the October meeting of the RBI’s monetary policy committee.

2. The Politics of Greetings: The transfer of IPS officer Bushara Bano, the Additional SP of Kharagpur, was officially described as a “routine transfer” for “public interest.” The political context, however, tells a different story. Hours before her transfer, a group called the Hindu Legal Fund claimed it had lodged a complaint against her for using the greeting “as-salamu alaikum” and “inshallah” and for not using “Vande Mataram” or “Jai Hind” in a video. The West Bengal BJP government’s opacity regarding the transfer strengthens the impression that it gave in to the demand. This raises critical questions about the neutrality of the Indian state and the politics of religious and cultural expression.

3. The Parthenon Myth: For two-and-a-half millennia, the Parthenon in Greece has been credited with an architectural sleight of hand that contributed to its perfection. Architects and art historians have insisted that its curved base and gently bulging columns were engineered to correct optical illusions. It is a wonderful story about the intellectual legacy of the ancient Greeks. It is also, according to Oxford University professor Alain Goriely, almost entirely fiction. The mathematician’s new paper debunks the myth, finding the illusions either unsupported by evidence or too microscopic to have been engineered. This finding offers a lesson on how readily admiration can manufacture glib explanations.

Introduction

The modern world is characterized by a complex interplay of economic, social, and intellectual forces. The decisions of central banks in Washington and Frankfurt have profound implications for the Indian economy. The transfer of a police officer in West Bengal raises fundamental questions about the nature of the Indian state and the politics of identity. The debunking of a centuries-old myth about the Parthenon challenges our understanding of history and the pursuit of knowledge.

This article analyses these three developments, their key issues, challenges, and the way forward. It argues that a comprehensive understanding of India’s governance and its place in the world requires attention to both the macro-level economic forces and the micro-level realities of social and intellectual life.

Background

Part 1: Rates Must Reflect Inflation Risks

Online with expectations, the US Federal Reserve has raised interest rates by 25 basis points, lifting the target range of the federal funds rate to 3.75 to 4 per cent. The rationale behind the decision, which all committee members supported, is straightforward—inflation remains uncomfortably high. As Fed chair Kevin Warsh also acknowledged, “The plain fact is that inflation is too high and has been for too long.”

In August, US consumer prices rose 0.4 per cent on a seasonally adjusted basis (keeping the 12-month rate at 3.4 per cent), according to the US Bureau of Labour Statistics. Inflation was driven, in large part, by energy prices. Gas prices in the US are at $4.43 a gallon, while diesel prices are at roughly $6.4, up from $3.7 a year ago, fuelling price pressures across the economy. The decision to raise rates is, however, at odds with US President Donald Trump’s desire for looser monetary policy. Only a few days ago, Trump posted on a social media platform, “High-interest rates put the USA at a very unfair disadvantage, and I won’t allow that to happen.” The 10-year US bond yield is hovering around 5 per cent. Trump has, in the past, also railed against the previous Fed chair Jerome Powell over the central bank’s interest-rate decisions. Following the Fed’s decision, he posted, “LOWER THE INTEREST RATES FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND FAST!”

But, considering the projections — inflation, based on the personal consumption expenditures price index, has been pegged at 3.7 per cent in 2026, 2.3 per cent in 2027 and 2.1 per cent in 2028 — it raises the odds of further rate hikes. A healthy labour market — surpassing expectations, 1.6 lakh jobs were added in August, while the unemployment rate remained at 4.1 per cent — will give greater space to policymakers to tackle inflation.

The US Fed is, however, not alone. Central banks across the world are also tightening rates. Last week, the European Central Bank also hiked interest rates by 25 basis points as it sees inflation remaining “well above target for an extended period.” Their decisions come only weeks ahead of the October meeting of the RBI’s monetary policy committee. Considering the price pressures in the economy and recent inflation projections, adjustments to the policy rates are needed.

Part 2: Rise Above the Politics of Greetings

Officially, it was a “routine transfer” for “public interest”. The political context, though, tells a different story. Hours before her transfer, a group called the Hindu Legal Fund claimed it had lodged a complaint with the West Bengal Home Secretary against IPS officer Bushara Bano, until recently the Additional SP of Kharagpur. The officer’s alleged offence was the greetings she used while speaking on video about her alma mater, Aligarh Muslim University, and praising its Residential Coaching Academy for helping her clear the UPSC exams. “She began with assalamu alaikum, used Inshallah… and did not use Vande Mataram or Jai Hind. A serving officer representing the Indian state should maintain neutrality and use national expressions,” according to the Hindu Legal Fund. The government’s opacity regarding the transfer strengthens the impression that it gave in to the demand.

Nothing in the All-India Service Rules prevents an officer from using religious or cultural greetings, especially in a private capacity. The inclusive secularism envisaged in the Indian Constitution — which officials and governments are meant to uphold — allows space for religious and cultural expression. By seemingly punishing an officer for words meant for a particular context and audience, West Bengal’s BJP government is, deliberately or not, making the same mistake as its predecessors.

For the better part of five decades, state capacity in West Bengal has been eroded by a politics that saw “the party” and its affiliates — whether the CPI(M) or Trinamool Congress — all but exercise a veto over all aspects of governance. Much of the anger against the TMC government and its “syndicate” stemmed precisely from the fact that it was at once both over-bearing where it did not need to be and absent where it was needed; that the law and the rules were selectively applied. The Suvendu Adhikari government, rather than focusing on correcting this lopsided deficit, seems to be deepening it. In a state that needs conversations and policies around jobs, education and industry, the focus seems to be on diet, “guru yatras” and how a young officer says hello and goodbye. It sends a message not of “minimum government, maximum governance” but of government high-handedness. The Suvendu Adhikari government needs to be responsible and responsive, not to social media trolls and fringe outfits, but to a more expansive and inclusive idea of “public interest”.

Part 3: A Reality Check for an Ancient Myth

For two-and-a-half millennia, the Parthenon in Greece has been credited with an architectural sleight of hand that contributed to its perfection. Architects and art historians have insisted that its curved base and gently bulging columns were engineered to correct optical illusions — that without such precision, the temple would appear to sag in the middle, much like a deep-bellied ham hock. It is a wonderful story about the intellectual legacy of the ancient Greeks. It is also, according to Oxford University professor Alain Goriely, almost entirely fiction. The mathematician’s new paper debunks the myth, finding the illusions either unsupported by evidence or too microscopic to have been engineered.

The myth’s genesis, it turns out, was not with Ictinus and Callicrates, the architects of the Parthenon, but from Vitruvius, a Roman writer four centuries later, whose hearsay was mistaken by Renaissance scholars for eyewitness knowledge. Goriely calls this the “supreme knowledge fallacy” — the flattering assumption that a civilisation capable of extraordinary art must also have possessed a modern scientist’s grasp of optics. In truth, the Greeks were still arguing about whether sight worked by rays shooting out of the eye — extramission, as Plato and others believed — or into it, intromission, as argued by Democritus and his cohorts.

Beyond the mathematics, there is also, it would seem, another lesson in Goriely’s findings: On how readily admiration can manufacture glib explanations. In a post-truth age, with its penchant for optical illusions that bend reality to one’s liking, Goriely’s most subversive invitation is not to admire the Parthenon less but to look at it more carefully. There are many things that make a civilisation great. The ability to discern when our certainties need a reality check is one of them.

Key Issues Raised

1. The Global Inflation Challenge

The article highlights the global inflation challenge. The US Federal Reserve has raised interest rates by 25 basis points, and the European Central Bank has also hiked rates. Inflation remains uncomfortably high, driven in large part by energy prices. The decisions come only weeks ahead of the October meeting of the RBI’s monetary policy committee. Considering the price pressures in the economy and recent inflation projections, adjustments to the policy rates are needed.

2. The Politics of Greetings and the Neutrality of the State

The article argues that the transfer of IPS officer Bushara Bano raises critical questions about the neutrality of the Indian state and the politics of religious and cultural expression. Nothing in the All-India Service Rules prevents an officer from using religious or cultural greetings, especially in a private capacity. The inclusive secularism envisaged in the Indian Constitution allows space for religious and cultural expression. By seemingly punishing an officer for words meant for a particular context and audience, the West Bengal government is making a mistake.

3. The Erosion of State Capacity in West Bengal

The article notes that for the better part of five decades, state capacity in West Bengal has been eroded by a politics that saw “the party” and its affiliates exercise a veto over all aspects of governance. The Suvendu Adhikari government, rather than focusing on correcting this lopsided deficit, seems to be deepening it. In a state that needs conversations and policies around jobs, education and industry, the focus seems to be on diet, “guru yatras” and how a young officer says hello and goodbye.

4. The Myth of the Parthenon and the Pursuit of Knowledge

The article highlights that the myth of the Parthenon’s architectural sleight of hand is almost entirely fiction. The mathematician’s new paper debunks the myth, finding the illusions either unsupported by evidence or too microscopic to have been engineered. This finding offers a lesson on how readily admiration can manufacture glib explanations. The ability to discern when our certainties need a reality check is one of the things that make a civilisation great.

5. The Need for a Reality Check

The article argues that in a post-truth age, with its penchant for optical illusions that bend reality to one’s liking, Goriely’s most subversive invitation is not to admire the Parthenon less but to look at it more carefully. There are many things that make a civilisation great. The ability to discern when our certainties need a reality check is one of them.

Timeline of Events

• August 2026: US consumer prices rose 0.4 per cent; 1.6 lakh jobs added; unemployment rate at 4.1 per cent.

• Recent: US Federal Reserve raises interest rates by 25 basis points.

• Recent: European Central Bank hikes interest rates by 25 basis points.

• Recent: IPS officer Bushara Bano transferred from Kharagpur.

• Recent: Oxford University professor Alain Goriely publishes a paper debunking the myth of the Parthenon.

• October: RBI’s monetary policy committee meeting.

Government Response

• Inflation: The US Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank have raised interest rates. The RBI is expected to adjust policy rates at its October meeting.

• Politics of Greetings: The West Bengal government has transferred IPS officer Bushara Bano. The government’s opacity regarding the transfer strengthens the impression that it gave in to the demand of the Hindu Legal Fund.

• Parthenon Myth: The article does not mention any specific government response.

Judicial Developments

The provided article does not mention any specific judicial developments related to inflation, the politics of greetings, or the Parthenon myth.

Constitutional & Governance Dimensions

• Inflation:

  • Article 21: Right to Life, which includes the right to a decent standard of living. Inflation erodes purchasing power and can impact the poor and middle class.

  • Fiscal Policy: The government needs to manage its fiscal deficit to stabilize prices.

  • Monetary Policy: The RBI needs to manage inflation.

• Politics of Greetings:

  • Article 25: Freedom of religion.

  • Article 14: Equality before Law.

  • Article 15: Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion.

  • Secularism: The inclusive secularism envisaged in the Indian Constitution allows space for religious and cultural expression.

  • Neutrality of the State: A serving officer representing the Indian state should maintain neutrality, but this does not mean they cannot use religious or cultural greetings in a private capacity.

• Parthenon Myth:

  • Article 51A(h): Fundamental duty to develop a scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform.

  • Education: The government has a role in determining the curriculum, including the history and mythology taught in schools.

Social and Political Significance

• Inflation:

  • Household Budgets: Inflation has a direct impact on household budgets, particularly for low-income families.

  • Economic Growth: Inflation can dampen economic growth.

  • Political Sensitivity: Inflation is a politically sensitive issue.

• Politics of Greetings:

  • Communal Harmony: The politics of greetings can exacerbate communal tensions.

  • Minority Rights: The transfer of a Muslim officer for using Islamic greetings raises concerns about minority rights.

  • State Neutrality: The transfer raises questions about the neutrality of the Indian state.

  • Political Polarization: The issue has become a major political issue in West Bengal.

• Parthenon Myth:

  • Intellectual Legacy: The myth of the Parthenon is a part of the intellectual legacy of ancient Greece.

  • Pursuit of Knowledge: The debunking of the myth highlights the importance of the pursuit of knowledge and the need for a reality check.

  • Post-Truth Age: The article highlights the dangers of a post-truth age, where admiration can manufacture glib explanations.

Challenges

1. Inflation: The global inflation challenge is a major challenge for policymakers.

2. Politics of Greetings: The politics of greetings and the neutrality of the state is a complex challenge.

3. Erosion of State Capacity: The erosion of state capacity in West Bengal is a major governance challenge.

4. Myth of the Parthenon: The debunking of the myth highlights the challenge of discerning when our certainties need a reality check.

5. Post-Truth Age: The article highlights the dangers of a post-truth age.

Way Forward

1. Inflation: The RBI should adjust policy rates to tackle inflation. The government should manage its fiscal deficit.

2. Politics of Greetings: The government should uphold the inclusive secularism envisaged in the Indian Constitution. It should not punish officers for using religious or cultural greetings in a private capacity.

3. Erosion of State Capacity: The West Bengal government should focus on correcting the lopsided deficit in state capacity. It should focus on conversations and policies around jobs, education and industry.

4. Myth of the Parthenon: The article calls for a reality check on our certainties. It calls for a more careful look at history and mythology.

5. Post-Truth Age: The article calls for the development of a scientific temper and the spirit of inquiry and reform.

Conclusion

The three issues discussed—global inflation, the politics of greetings, and the myth of the Parthenon—are distinct but interconnected. They reflect the complex and multifaceted challenges facing India and the world.

The way forward requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses both the macro-level economic forces and the micro-level realities of social and intellectual life. It requires adjusting policy rates to tackle inflation, upholding the inclusive secularism envisaged in the Indian Constitution, correcting the lopsided deficit in state capacity, and developing a scientific temper.

The time for action is now. The future of India’s economy, its social harmony, and its intellectual legacy depends on the choices made today.

---

5 UPSC-Style Questions & Answers

Q1. “Rates must reflect inflation risks.” Discuss this statement in the context of the recent decisions of the US Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank.
Answer: The statement is accurate. The US Federal Reserve has raised interest rates by 25 basis points, lifting the target range of the federal funds rate to 3.75 to 4 per cent. The rationale behind the decision is straightforward—inflation remains uncomfortably high. In August, US consumer prices rose 0.4 per cent on a seasonally adjusted basis (keeping the 12-month rate at 3.4 per cent). Inflation was driven, in large part, by energy prices.
The European Central Bank also hiked interest rates by 25 basis points as it sees inflation remaining “well above target for an extended period.” Their decisions come only weeks ahead of the October meeting of the RBI’s monetary policy committee. Considering the price pressures in the economy and recent inflation projections, adjustments to the policy rates are needed.
Key Issues:

1. Global Inflation Challenge: Central banks across the world are tightening rates.

2. Political Pressure: The US Fed’s decision is at odds with US President Donald Trump’s desire for looser monetary policy.

3. RBI’s Policy: The RBI is expected to adjust policy rates at its October meeting.
   The way forward requires a coordinated global response to inflation.

Q2. Discuss the constitutional and legal dimensions of the transfer of IPS officer Bushara Bano. What does it reveal about the neutrality of the Indian state?
Answer: The transfer of IPS officer Bushara Bano raises critical questions about the neutrality of the Indian state and the politics of religious and cultural expression.
Constitutional and Legal Dimensions:

1. Article 25: Freedom of religion.

2. Article 14: Equality before Law.

3. Article 15: Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion.

4. All-India Service Rules: Nothing in the All-India Service Rules prevents an officer from using religious or cultural greetings, especially in a private capacity.
   Neutrality of the Indian State:
   The inclusive secularism envisaged in the Indian Constitution allows space for religious and cultural expression. By seemingly punishing an officer for words meant for a particular context and audience, West Bengal’s BJP government is making a mistake. It sends a message not of “minimum government, maximum governance” but of government high-handedness.
   The way forward requires the government to uphold the inclusive secularism envisaged in the Indian Constitution.

Q3. “The erosion of state capacity in West Bengal is a major governance challenge.” Critically examine this statement.
Answer: The statement is accurate. For the better part of five decades, state capacity in West Bengal has been eroded by a politics that saw “the party” and its affiliates — whether the CPI(M) or Trinamool Congress — all but exercise a veto over all aspects of governance.
Key Issues:

1. Over-bearing Government: The TMC government was at once both over-bearing where it did not need to be and absent where it was needed.

2. Selective Application of Law: The law and the rules were selectively applied.

3. Lopsided Deficit: The Suvendu Adhikari government, rather than focusing on correcting this lopsided deficit, seems to be deepening it.

4. Focus on Fringe Issues: In a state that needs conversations and policies around jobs, education and industry, the focus seems to be on diet, “guru yatras” and how a young officer says hello and goodbye.
   The way forward requires the West Bengal government to be responsible and responsive to a more expansive and inclusive idea of “public interest”.

Q4. “A reality check for an ancient myth.” Discuss the debunking of the myth of the Parthenon and its implications for the pursuit of knowledge.
Answer: For two-and-a-half millennia, the Parthenon in Greece has been credited with an architectural sleight of hand that contributed to its perfection. It is also, according to Oxford University professor Alain Goriely, almost entirely fiction. The mathematician’s new paper debunks the myth, finding the illusions either unsupported by evidence or too microscopic to have been engineered.
Implications for the Pursuit of Knowledge:

1. Supreme Knowledge Fallacy: The myth’s genesis was not with the architects of the Parthenon, but from Vitruvius, a Roman writer four centuries later, whose hearsay was mistaken by Renaissance scholars for eyewitness knowledge.

2. Admiration Can Manufacture Glib Explanations: The article highlights how readily admiration can manufacture glib explanations.

3. Reality Check: The article calls for a reality check on our certainties.
   The way forward requires the development of a scientific temper and the spirit of inquiry and reform.

Q5. “The time for action is now.” In light of this statement, suggest a comprehensive strategy for India to address the dual challenges of inflation and communal polarization.
Answer: A comprehensive strategy to address the dual challenges must include:

1. Inflation:

   • Monetary Policy: The RBI should adjust policy rates to tackle inflation.

   • Fiscal Policy: The government should manage its fiscal deficit.

   • Supply-Side Measures: The government should take steps to improve supply chains and reduce bottlenecks.

2. Communal Polarization:

   • Uphold Secularism: The government should uphold the inclusive secularism envisaged in the Indian Constitution.

   • Neutrality of the State: The government should ensure the neutrality of the Indian state.

   • Promote Harmony: The government should promote communal harmony through dialogue and engagement.

   • Rule of Law: The government should ensure that the law is applied equally to all communities.
     The time for action is now. The future of India’s economy and its social harmony depends on the choices made today.