Navigating Tariffs and Protecting Growth, India’s Strategic Autonomy in a Shifting Global Economy
The recent imposition of double tariffs on select Indian exports by the United States has sent ripples through the economic and political landscape, prompting a critical examination of India’s resilience and strategic posture. While the immediate, direct impact on India’s macroeconomic stability is limited—affecting less than 1% of GDP due to the low aggregate value of targeted exports and various exemptions—the event is a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in a globalized trading system. As articulated by eminent economist Ashima Goyal, this moment is not a crisis but a test. It is a test of India’s ability to uphold its strategic autonomy, protect its growth trajectory, and implement sophisticated, multi-layered policy responses that shield its most vulnerable sectors while accelerating long-term domestic reforms. The nation’s response will be a defining case study in how a large, developing economy can navigate the turbulent waters of great power politics and protectionism without compromising on its developmental goals.
The Limited Impact and the Strategic Imperative
The initial analysis of the US tariff decision reveals a contained economic threat. The targeted exports constitute a small fraction of India’s total trade, and the country even maintains a trade surplus with the US. This provides a crucial cushion. However, as Goyal points out, the pain is not evenly distributed. The tariffs disproportionately affect employment-intensive Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), which are the backbone of the Indian economy and its largest source of non-agricultural employment. This creates a socio-economic imperative for a targeted policy response, even if the national accounts appear robust.
The fundamental principle at stake is strategic autonomy—the ability of a nation to make decisions free from external coercion and in pursuit of its own national interest. For India, this means resisting being pushed into unfavorable trade or political concessions simply because of punitive measures on a narrow set of goods. The nation’s size, its demographic dividend, and its growing domestic market provide it with a unique bargaining power that many other developing economies lack. The challenge is to leverage this inherent strength through smart policy.
The Policy Toolkit: Time-Limited, Targeted Support for MSMEs
The article proposes a nuanced and proven policy toolkit to address the immediate shock to MSMEs. The model draws from the highly successful interventions deployed post-pandemic, which emphasized liquidity support over permanent bailouts. The key measures include:
-
Liquidity on Easy Terms: Ensuring affected firms have immediate access to working capital to keep operations running.
-
Loan Roll-Overs without NPA Classification: Allowing lenders to restructure loans for a period (e.g., one year) without having to classify them as non-performing assets (NPAs). This prevents a chilling effect on bank lending and gives firms breathing room.
-
Credit Guarantees and Interest Subsidies: The government can act as a partial guarantor for new loans and subsidize interest rates, reducing the cost of capital for struggling exporters.
Crucially, this support must be designed with sunset clauses. This prevents moral hazard—where companies become perpetually dependent on government support—and ensures the measures are truly temporary. The post-pandemic experience is instructive: the mere availability of such support instilled confidence, and a robust recovery meant very little of the guaranteed amount was actually drawn upon. The budgetary impact was minimal, proving that such a strategy is consistent with the government’s broader goal of fiscal consolidation.
The Long Game: Diversification, Domestic Reforms, and Decentralization
While managing the immediate fallout is essential, the tariff episode underscores the urgent need for long-term strategic shifts. The first is diversification. India’s trade engagement must be spread across a wider array of countries to avoid over-reliance on any single partner, including the US. The government has a major role as a diplomat and enabler, forging new trade agreements and strengthening economic ties with partners in Europe, Africa, Latin America, and especially within the Global South.
However, external diversification is impossible without internal strength. This is where the agenda of deep-rooted domestic reform becomes critical. Goyal argues that reform must move beyond the central government and permeate all tiers of governance. The real obstacles to business—overlapping regulations, obstructive local political demands, and regulatory uncertainty at the municipal level—often exist on the ground. She suggests a fascinating model: publishing and adopting best-practice “operating procedures and task-mappings” from well-performing municipalities across the country. Furthermore, she proposes a system of incentivizing local bodies—perhaps through financial rewards or greater autonomy—if their area meets objective economic and developmental criteria. In a multi-party democracy where voters increasingly demand results, making economic performance a political target for local leaders could be a powerful catalyst for change.
Macroeconomic Policy Synergy: The Fiscal-Monetary Dance
The article provides a sharp analysis of the current macroeconomic context. The stellar 7.8% growth in Q1 demonstrates the success of counter-cyclical policies, particularly government-led infrastructure investment, in reversing a slowdown. Notably, strong private consumption growth (7%) appears to be driven by rising employment and incomes rather than debt, indicating healthy, sustainable underlying demand.
In this environment, Goyal makes a compelling case for a more accommodative monetary policy to support growth in the face of external demand shocks. Her argument is nuanced:
-
Core inflation remains soft, and growing competition is keeping a lid on corporate pricing power.
-
Real interest rates are still above equilibrium because expected trend inflation is running below the RBI’s 4% target.
-
“Trend inflation below target implies output below potential.” This is a crucial point. If the economy is not overheating, monetary policy should not be restrictive. The government’s fiscal efforts to raise potential output through investment are nullified if high borrowing costs discourage private investment.
-
The rise in the 10-year G-Sec yield above 6.5% is a concern, as long rates are what matter for real sector investment. A rate cut would help flatten the yield curve and improve monetary policy transmission.
The current stance of a neutral monetary policy alongside a consolidating fiscal policy is sub-optimal. A more synergistic approach, with monetary policy doing its part to ensure output reaches its new, higher potential, is needed to protect growth from external shocks.
Channeling Surplus Liquidity: A “Carrots and Sticks” Approach for Corporate India
A final, innovative proposal addresses a perennial Indian problem: the inadequacy of private corporate investment in physical assets and R&D. Despite high growth and corporate profits, businesses have been hesitant to make large-scale investments. Goyal suggests a structured “carrots and sticks” framework to channel corporate savings into productive, future-ready sectors.
She proposes giving firms three options for deploying a portion of their profits:
-
Invest in Themselves: Directly invest or spend 10% of Profit Before Tax (PBT) on R&D.
-
Invest in the Nation: Put an equivalent amount into designated infrastructure bonds or funds.
-
The Default Option: If they choose neither, the amount is collected as a tax, which the government will then use to build a pipeline of ready-to-go infrastructure projects.
This initiative, which could be branded “Corporates for the Future,” aligns corporate strategy with national goals. It creates a virtuous cycle where helping the country build future-ready infrastructure also creates a more robust ecosystem for businesses to thrive. It is a pragmatic solution that respects corporate choice while ensuring that the nation’s surplus capital is directed toward productive ends.
Conclusion: A Nation Pulling Together
The US tariff decision is a challenge, but it is also an opportunity. It is an opportunity to reaffirm strategic autonomy, to double down on targeted, intelligent economic policy, and to accelerate the deep reforms needed to unlock India’s full potential. The response cannot be piecemeal; it requires a whole-of-nation approach. From the central bank ensuring supportive monetary conditions, to the central government designing fiscal incentives, to state and municipal governments competing to improve ease of doing business, and finally, to corporate India stepping up to invest in the nation’s future—everyone has a role to play. As Ashima Goyal concludes, this is the time for everyone to pull together. By doing so, India can transform an external shock into an internal catalyst for a more resilient, diversified, and powerful economy.
Q&A: Navigating Economic Strategy Amidst External Shocks
Q1: Given the limited impact of the tariffs (<1% of GDP), why is a policy response necessary?
A1: While the macroeconomic impact is small, the microeconomic and social impact is significant. The tariffs disproportionately target employment-intensive MSMEs (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises), which are critical for job creation and socio-economic stability. A targeted policy response is essential to prevent widespread job losses and business closures in this vulnerable sector, even if the overall GDP number is unaffected. It’s a matter of targeted intervention versus broad-brush policy.
Q2: What is “strategic autonomy” in an economic context, and how does it apply here?
A2: Economic strategic autonomy is a nation’s capacity to pursue its own economic and developmental goals without being forced into concessions due to external pressure or over-dependence on another country. In this context, it means India should not alter its broader foreign or trade policy solely in response to these tariffs. Its large domestic market and diversified trade relationships provide the leverage to absorb the shock and resist coercion, making decisions based on long-term national interest rather than short-term pressure.
Q3: How does the proposed support for MSMEs avoid “moral hazard”?
A3: The proposed support is designed to be temporary and time-bound, featuring “sunset clauses.” This means the liquidity support, loan roll-over permissions, and credit guarantees are not permanent bailouts but emergency measures with a fixed expiration date. This approach, proven effective post-pandemic, provides a bridge for companies to find new markets or adjust their business models without creating an expectation of perpetual government support, thereby avoiding moral hazard.
Q4: Why does Ashima Goyal argue for a more accommodative monetary policy (interest rate cuts) amidst strong growth?
A4: Goyal’s argument is nuanced. She acknowledges strong growth but points out that core inflation remains soft and expected trend inflation is below the RBI’s 4% target. This suggests the economy is still operating below its potential output. Furthermore, she highlights that the external tariff shock constitutes a demand shock to exports. In this scenario, a slightly accommodative monetary policy can help support domestic demand and ensure the economy reaches its full potential without stoking inflation, especially since government-led fiscal consolidation is already underway.
Q5: What is the goal of the proposed “Corporates for the Future” initiative?
A5: The goal is to solve a persistent problem: despite high corporate profits, private investment in physical assets and R&D remains low. The initiative aims to channel corporate savings into productive, future-enhancing investments by giving firms a choice: either invest in their own R&D, invest in national infrastructure projects, or pay a tax that will be used for the same purpose. This “carrots and sticks” approach aligns corporate strategy with national development goals, ensuring that surplus capital is used to build long-term economic strength rather than sitting idle.
