Tamil Nadu Ongoing Battle with NEET, Legal Hurdles and the Way Forward for Students
Why in News?
President Droupadi Murmu has withheld assent for the Tamil Nadu Admission to Undergraduate Medical Degree Courses Bill 2021, reigniting the State’s long-standing opposition to the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for medical admissions. This development has placed students in a state of uncertainty, especially as the admission season approaches. 
Introduction
Tamil Nadu has consistently opposed NEET-based admissions, arguing that it undermines the State’s social justice policies and disadvantages students from rural and underprivileged backgrounds. The recent withholding of presidential assent to the State’s 2021 Bill has escalated tensions and forced the State to consider new legal and academic strategies.
Key Issues and Background
1. The 2021 Bill and Political Will
-
The Tamil Nadu Admission to UG Medical Courses Bill 2021 sought exemption from NEET and proposed admissions based on Class 12 board scores.
-
The Bill was passed unanimously in the State Assembly, based on the recommendations of the Justice A.K. Rajan Committee.
-
However, Governor R.N. Ravi returned the Bill after five months, and the Assembly re-adopted it before sending it to the President.
2. Presidential Assent Withheld
-
President Droupadi Murmu has withheld assent, although the timeline and rationale were not officially disclosed.
-
This mirrors the fate of previous anti-NEET Bills from Tamil Nadu in 2017, which were also denied assent at the central level.
3. Legal and Constitutional Complications
-
Under Article 254(2) of the Constitution, States can seek Presidential assent for Bills repugnant to central laws under the Concurrent List.
-
The Centre raised concerns about the Bill’s potential to endanger the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of the nation.
-
NEET has been repeatedly upheld by the Supreme Court, making legal challenges difficult.
The Core of the Concern
-
Students in Tamil Nadu are now caught in a state of confusion and anxiety, unsure of the admission process.
-
The lack of finality from the judiciary or the Centre has left the State with limited legal options.
-
NEET is seen by many as an imperfect test, not a complete measure of merit, yet it remains mandatory.
Key Observations
-
The Bill was passed unanimously in the Tamil Nadu legislature, reflecting broad political consensus.
-
The judiciary is unlikely to resolve the issue urgently, further prolonging student uncertainty.
-
The State must prepare legally and academically—including launching coaching programs to help students prepare for NEET effectively.
Conclusion
While Tamil Nadu has made a strong political and legal case against NEET, it faces significant constitutional and judicial hurdles. As the path to exemption remains blocked, the State must now focus on equipping its students to face NEET confidently through better coaching and academic support—without losing sight of its long-term policy objectives.
Q&A Section
Q1. Why was the Tamil Nadu NEET-exemption Bill 2021 rejected?
President Droupadi Murmu withheld assent without clarifying the timeline or reason. The Centre had earlier raised concerns about its impact on national integrity.
Q2. What is Tamil Nadu’s alternative to NEET for medical admissions?
The State proposed using Class 12 board examination scores for admission to government quota medical seats.
Q3. What constitutional provision did Tamil Nadu invoke?
Article 254(2) of the Constitution, which allows States to pass laws repugnant to central laws if the President gives assent.
Q4. What are the implications of the President’s decision for students?
Students are left in a state of uncertainty and anxiety, not knowing whether NEET or board scores will be used for admissions.
Q5. What should Tamil Nadu do now?
Tamil Nadu must prepare for a legal challenge while simultaneously helping students with NEET preparation, given the improbability of an early resolution.
