The WPL’s Watershed Moment, Why Women’s Cricket in India is Demanding a Premier League of Its Own
The roar that echoed through the Arun Jaitley Stadium in Delhi on a balmy March evening was more than just the sound of Royal Challengers Bengaluru fans celebrating their first-ever franchise title. It was the sound of a tectonic plate shifting in the world of sports. Smriti Mandhana’s majestic, match-winning 91* in the final of the fourth Women’s Premier League (WPL) season was not merely a great innings; it was a statement, an exclamation point on a tournament that has definitively proven its worth. The WPL 2024 has done what India’s historic ICC Women’s T20 World Cup triumph in 2023 began: it has moved the conversation about women’s cricket in India from one of potential and patronizing support to one of undeniable commercial viability, competitive depth, and urgent, scalable ambition. The note to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is now clear, bold, and backed by irrefutable evidence: The WPL is ready. It is time to invest, expand, and institutionalize.
For years, the argument for women’s cricket was couched in the language of morality and equity—it was the “right thing to do.” The success of trailblazers like Mithali Raj and Jhulan Goswami kept the flame alive. The 2023 World Cup victory provided the explosive, nation-binding moment that showcased mass appeal. But leagues, not just national teams, are the engines that sustain and professionalize a sport. The Indian Premier League (IPL) taught us that. And now, in just its fourth season, the WPL has demonstrated it is no longer a tentative experiment or a charitable offshoot. It is a robust, competitive, and commercially attractive product in its own right, demanding a strategic vision commensurate with its proven success.
Beyond the Scoreboard: The Multifaceted Success of WPL 2024
The success of the latest WPL season cannot be measured by viewership numbers and sponsorship deals alone, though those are reportedly at an all-time high. Its true triumph lies in the multidimensional proof of concept it delivered.
1. The Emergence of a Post-Transition Blueprint:
The tournament served as a crucial laboratory for India’s cricketing future. While stalwarts like Harmanpreet Kaur (who had a prolific season) and Mandhana shone, the spotlight was equally on the next generation. Jemimah Rodrigues, handed the Delhi Capitals captaincy, displayed a tactical acumen and leadership maturity that belied her age and inexperience in the role. She didn’t just fill a slot; she led a powerhouse team to the final, making sharp decisions under pressure. This is invaluable for the Indian team as it contemplates life after its legendary core.
Even more telling was the emergence of fresh, homegrown talent outside the national team bubble. Delhi’s Nandani Sharma, a medium pacer, ended the tournament as the joint-highest wicket-taker, including a spectacular hat-trick—a feat of skill and nerve. Gujarat Giants’ Anushka Sharma (no relation to the actor) announced herself with fearless strokeplay and breathtaking athleticism in the field. These are not just “promising” players; they are WPL-made stars, products of the high-pressure franchise environment that the IPL has long provided for men. Their rise proves the league is fulfilling its primary domestic function: talent identification and acceleration.
2. Competitive Parity and Quality of Cricket:
Gone are the days of one or two teams dominating through sheer concentration of international stars. The 2024 season was fiercely competitive. The gap between the top and bottom of the table narrowed significantly. Matches were high-scoring affairs, decided in the final overs, showcasing not just power-hitting but sophisticated death bowling, agile fielding, and clever captaincy. The cricket was fast, skillful, and unpredictable—the holy trinity of a successful T20 product. This parity is a sign of a healthy league where franchises are investing intelligently in scouting and coaching, creating a rising tide that lifts all boats.
3. Franchise Investment and Commercial Traction:
The franchises, initially perhaps cautious, are now all-in. The visible investment in coaching staff (featuring legends like Shane Warne’s mentees and top-tier Indian coaches), analytics, player development programs, and marketing is a clear market signal. They see a return on investment. Sponsorship logos are more prominent, stadium attendances in cities like Delhi and Bengaluru have been robust, and the broadcast product has become slicker. The commercial ecosystem is beginning to hum, demonstrating that women’s cricket is not a CSR activity for these business conglomerates, but a viable vertical with a growing, engaged audience.
The Unambiguous Case for Expansion and Elevation
Given this resounding success, the BCCI’s next steps must be proactive, not reactive. The league is straining at the seams of its current five-team, short-season format. To realize its full potential, the board must act on several fronts:
1. Expansion from Five to a Minimum of Eight Teams:
A five-team league, while a sensible start, inherently limits opportunities. It restricts the number of domestic players who can experience elite, high-pressure environments. Expanding to eight teams (ideally in a phased manner by 2026-27) would:
-
Create More Playing Opportunities: Uncover talent from deeper within India’s vast geography, giving chances to players from emerging states.
-
Enhance Regional Rivalries: Include cities with massive fan bases like Chennai, Kolkata, Punjab, and Rajasthan, tapping into deep-rooted IPL loyalties and creating new narratives.
-
Increase Inventory and Value: More teams mean more matches, a longer season, greater broadcast revenue, and more sponsorship real estate, making the league more valuable for all stakeholders.
2. A Dedicated, Uncluttered Window in the Calendar:
The WPL cannot continue to be squeezed into a three-week period as an afterthought to the men’s schedule. It deserves a prominent, protected window. A longer season (4-5 weeks) allows for home-and-away fixtures, enabling franchises to build a local fan base, engage with communities, and create a true “home advantage” atmosphere. This is crucial for building club identity, which is key to franchise sports. The BCCI must work with the International Cricket Council (ICC) and other boards to ensure the best global talent is available, treating the WPL window with the same respect as major international series.
3. Strategic Marketing and Narrative Building:
The BCCI and franchises must invest in telling the stories of the players. The public connects with narratives—the hardworking medium pacer from a small town, the elegant batter balancing studies and sport, the veteran’s quest for a title. A concerted marketing push, utilizing digital media aggressively to showcase not just the cricket but the personalities behind it, is essential to transition from loyal viewership to fandom. The “Pride of Place” the editorial mentions must be earned through visibility.
4. Grassroots Symbiosis:
The success of the WPL must be leveraged to turbocharge grassroots development. A portion of the league’s revenue should be earmarked for infrastructure at the state and district levels—better pitches, training facilities, and coaching programs for young girls. The visibility of WPL stars will inspire participation; the infrastructure must be there to receive and nurture that inspiration. The WPL should be the shining apex of a much broader, well-funded pyramid.
The Global Context and the Opportunity for Leadership
India is not operating in a vacuum. The Women’s Big Bash League (WBBL) in Australia and The Hundred in England have shown the way. However, with its demographic heft, cricketing madness, and commercial savvy, India has the unique potential to create the single biggest and most lucrative league in women’s team sports globally. A robust, expanded WPL would set the financial benchmark for women cricketers worldwide, attracting the best talent and making India the epicenter of the professional women’s game. This is not just good for India; it’s good for global cricket, raising standards everywhere.
The BCCI, often criticized for its conservatism, now has a golden opportunity to be a visionary leader. By backing the WPL with the same strategic intent that built the IPL into a behemoth, it can achieve multiple goals: securing the long-term health of the Indian women’s team, creating a powerful new revenue stream, fulfilling its role in growing the game globally, and making a profound social statement about gender equity in sport.
Conclusion: From Proof of Concept to Blueprint for the Future
The fourth season of the WPL has done its job. It has provided irrefutable proof. Proof that the cricket is world-class. Proof that new stars are born under its lights. Proof that fans will engage and franchises will invest. Proof that it is a viable, thriving sports product.
The question is no longer “if” the WPL can succeed. It has. The question now is “how big” can it become. The BCCI stands at a decision point. It can choose to be cautiously satisfied with a successful five-team event, or it can seize the moment to build a genuine sporting institution—a league that empowers a generation of athletes, captivates a nation, and reshapes the landscape of global women’s sport. The note has been delivered. The ball, as they say, is now firmly in the board’s court. It’s time for them to play an innings as bold and decisive as Smriti Mandhana’s in the final.
Q&A Section
Q1: What specific aspects of WPL 2024 proved it was more than just a successful tournament, but a sign of long-term viability?
A1: Beyond the thrilling final, WPL 2024 demonstrated viability through: (1) Talent Production: The emergence of uncapped Indian stars like Nandani Sharma (leading wicket-taker) and Anushka Sharma, showing the league’s power to develop players beyond the established national team. (2) Leadership Pipeline: Jemimah Rodrigues’s mature captaincy for Delhi Capitals provided a blueprint for India’s post-Harmanpreet Kaur future. (3) Competitive Depth: Increased parity among teams and high-quality, high-scoring games indicated a rise in overall standard, not just reliance on a few superstars. (4) Franchise Commitment: Visible investments in coaching, scouting, and marketing by team owners signaled serious long-term commercial belief.
Q2: Why is expanding the WPL beyond five teams considered a critical next step?
A2: Expansion is critical for several reasons: (a) Opportunity Creation: It dramatically increases the number of domestic players exposed to elite coaching and high-pressure matches, broadening and deepening India’s talent pool. (b) Commercial Growth: More teams mean a longer season, more matches, increased broadcast inventory, and greater sponsorship opportunities, enhancing the league’s financial ecosystem and value. (c) Geographic and Fan Engagement: Including major cricketing cities like Kolkata, Chennai, and Punjab taps into existing fan bases, creates new regional rivalries, and builds stronger local identities for franchises, which is key to sustainable fan loyalty.
Q3: How does a stronger WPL directly benefit the Indian national women’s cricket team?
A3: A stronger WPL acts as a continuous high-performance laboratory for the national team. It: (1) Provides Ready-Made Replacements: It identifies and prepares the next generation of players (like the Sharmas) in a competitive environment, ensuring smoother transitions when veterans retire. (2) Develops Pressure Players: Domestic players get accustomed to playing in high-stakes, televised matches in front of large crowds, making them better prepared for international pressure. (3) Fosters Leadership: It creates a pool of players with captaincy and leadership experience at a high level, as seen with Jemimah Rodrigues. (4) Raises the Overall Standard: Increased competition for places pushes all players to improve, raising the baseline skill level of the entire national pool.
Q4: What does giving the WPL a “pride of place” on the sporting calendar practically entail?
A4: Practically, it means: (1) A Dedicated, Uninterrupted Window: Allocating a specific 4-5 week period in the annual calendar that is protected from clashes with major men’s series or other international women’s commitments, ensuring availability of all top stars. (2) A Longer Season: Moving from a compressed three-week event to a longer format that allows for home-and-away fixtures, enabling city-based fan engagement and proper tournament narrative buildup. (3) Promotional Priority: The BCCI and broadcasters marketing the league with the same intensity and budget as they do for major men’s events, building anticipation and viewership.
Q5: In the global context, what opportunity does a fully-realized WPL present for India and world cricket?
A5: A fully-realized, expanded WPL positions India as the undisputed financial and competitive hub of global women’s cricket. It would: (1) Set the Salary Benchmark: Attract the best international players with the most lucrative contracts, raising professional standards worldwide. (2) Drive Global Interest: As the biggest market, India’s focused investment would pull media and sponsor attention to the women’s game globally. (3) Provide a Blueprint: It would offer a successful model for other nations to develop their own domestic structures. For the BCCI, it’s a chance to transition from being cricket’s financial powerhouse to also becoming its foremost innovator and leader in gender-equal sports development.
