The Unseen Anchor, Navigating Modernity’s Crisis Through the Ancient Call for Divine Shelter
In an era defined by breakneck technological advancement, unprecedented material abundance, and a constant, buzzing connectivity, a paradoxical sense of disconnection and existential anxiety has become a defining feature of modern life. Amidst the relentless pursuit of success, security, and satisfaction, a profound and timeless question persists: where does one find true, lasting refuge? This is not a new question, but as articulated by Ajit Kumar Bishnoi in his poignant piece, “The eternal call to take the shelter of God,” it is perhaps more relevant now than ever before. His reflection, distilled from nearly four decades of spiritual inquiry, serves as a critical counter-narrative to the prevailing ethos of our time, positing that the ultimate sanctuary from life’s inherent fragility is not found in the external world, but in a conscious, deliberate turning towards the Divine. This concept, far from being an antiquated religious trope, offers a radical framework for understanding and addressing the contemporary crises of meaning, mental health, and societal fragmentation.
The Modern Condition: A Sea of Drifting Ships
Bishnoi’s central metaphor is devastatingly accurate: a life without divine shelter is like “a ship at sea without a destination — drifting endlessly, uncertain of where the winds will carry it.” This image perfectly captures the modern condition. We are a society of high-performing drifters. We are equipped with sophisticated navigational tools—career ladders, financial plans, wellness apps, social networks—yet lack a fundamental coordinates for our ultimate destination. Why are we here? What is the purpose of all this striving?
This aimlessness manifests in what sociologists and psychologists have termed the “age of anxiety.” Despite living in one of the most prosperous and safe periods in human history, rates of depression, burnout, loneliness, and substance abuse are at record highs. The promises of modernity—that wealth, achievement, and pleasure would lead to happiness—have proven hollow. As Bishnoi astutely observes, the mind, “left undetected, runs restlessly in search of peace — in possessions, achievements, recognition, or even fleeting pleasures. But none of these bring lasting satisfaction.” Each accomplishment, each new purchase, provides only a momentary dopamine hit, quickly replaced by a new craving, a deeper sense of emptiness often described as “the hedonic treadmill.” We are running faster and faster, but we remain in the same place existentially.
The Illusion of Secular Security: Wealth, Health, and Relationships
The article compellingly dismantles the pillars of what we typically consider “security.” We pour our energy into building financial stability, only to see markets crash, investments vanish, or unexpected crises drain our resources. We worship at the altar of health and wellness, constructing rigorous routines to maintain our physical vessels, yet we are confronted with the undeniable truth that “even the strongest of bodies ultimately return to dust.” Bishnoi reminds us of the scriptural wisdom that the body is merely a temporary amalgamation of the five elements—earth, water, fire, air, and space—and must one day dissolve back into them.
Perhaps the most poignant fragility lies in relationships. We seek validation, love, and identity through our connections with family, friends, and partners. Yet, these bonds, however strong, are impermanent. They change, evolve, and sometimes break. To place the entire burden of our existential need for refuge on another fallible human being is a recipe for certain disappointment. This is not to devalue human love and connection, which are vital and beautiful, but to recognize that they cannot bear the weight of being our ultimate source of security. They are fellow passengers on the ship, not the anchor itself.
Shelter as Action, Not Escape: The Bhagavad Gita’s Blueprint
A common misinterpretation of seeking divine refuge is that it is a form of escapism—a retreat from the challenges and responsibilities of worldly life. Bishnoi, echoing the core philosophy of the Bhagavad Gita, vehemently counters this. The call to shelter is not a call to inaction but a call to a different kind of action. He clarifies that it is “the very essence of living meaningfully.”
This is where the doctrine of Nishkama Karma, or selfless action, as taught by Lord Krishna, becomes essential. Krishna’s instruction to Arjuna—”Sarva-dharman parityajya mam ekam sharanam vraja” (abandon all varieties of duties and simply take refuge in Me)—is often misread as an injunction to abandon one’s post. The deeper meaning, as Bishnoi explains, is to abandon the attachment to the fruits of one’s actions and to perform one’s duties as an offering to the Divine.
This transforms every role from a burden into an act of devotion. “To be a parent, a professional, a citizen, or a friend while rooted in God’s shelter transforms duty into devotion.” The executive is no longer working solely for a bonus but as a service to the divine presence in her colleagues and clients. The parent is not raising a child to meet societal expectations but nurturing a soul entrusted to their care. The citizen acts not out of partisan loyalty but from a place of universal compassion. The driving forces shift from fear, greed, and pride to “surrender, trust, and love.” This framework does not negate worldly life; it sanctifies it.
The Psychology of the Resting Mind: From Seeking to Abiding
Bishnoi’s analogy of the mind as a bird on a ship, drawn from the poet-saint Surdasi, is a masterpiece of spiritual psychology. The bird (the mind) flies out relentlessly in search of land (security, pleasure, validation), but finds none in the vast ocean of worldly existence. It must return to the ship (the shelter of the Divine) because it has nowhere else to land. All our seeking—our scrolling, our consuming, our achieving—is the flight of the bird. The peace we crave is not found in the flight but in the returning; not in the seeking, but in the abiding.
Neurologically, this can be understood as a shift from the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, associated with self-referential thought, mind-wandering, and anxiety, to a state of focused present-moment awareness, often cultivated through prayer and meditation. When the mind turns towards God, or a higher consciousness, it ceases its frantic grasping and achieves a state of rest. This is the “peace beyond understanding” that Bishnoi describes—a peace not contingent on external circumstances being perfect, but on an internal alignment with a perceived eternal constant.
A Universal Call Across Time and Culture
While Bishnoi writes from within the Hindu tradition, referencing the Gita and Bhakti saints, his message is profoundly universal. This “eternal call” is indeed “not bound by age, culture, or circumstance.” It is the same core impulse that underpins the Psalmist’s cry, “The Lord is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge” (Psalm 18:2). It is found in the Islamic concept of Tawakkul—absolute trust and reliance upon Allah. It is the essence of the Buddhist taking refuge in the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Sangha. It is heard in the mystic poetry of Rumi and the quiet contemplations of Thomas Merton.
This universality suggests that the need for divine shelter is not a cultural construct but a fundamental aspect of the human condition. In every generation, amidst every kind of societal structure, humans have sensed their own fragility and reached for something infinite and unchanging to hold onto. In our current, hyper-secularized generation, we have often tried to replace this with finite things—nationalism, political ideology, brand loyalty, fandom—with disastrously divisive consequences. Reconnecting with this perennial wisdom may be key to healing our fractured world.
Conclusion: From Burden to Sacred Journey
The ultimate power of Bishnoi’s message is its transformative potential for the individual. The pursuit of divine shelter is the most practical of endeavors. It does not require abandoning one’s life, but infusing it with a new purpose. It is about shifting the locus of our identity from our job, our relationships, or our possessions to our fundamental nature as, in his words, “children of the Divine.”
When this shift occurs, life ceases to be “a burden to endure” and becomes “a sacred journey to embrace.” Challenges remain, pain is still felt, and loss is still experienced. But they are met from a place of anchored strength, from the unwavering knowledge that at the core of one’s being lies a connection to an indestructible peace. In a world adrift, this is not merely a spiritual suggestion; it is a vital lifeline. The call has always been there. The question for modern humanity is whether, amidst the noise of our own creation, we can still hear it and have the courage to answer.
Q&A: Unpacking the Call for Divine Shelter
Q1: Isn’t taking shelter in God just a form of escapism from real-world problems?
A1: Quite the opposite. True spiritual shelter, as defined in the article, is not about running away from responsibilities but about changing one’s orientation towards them. It involves performing one’s duties—as a parent, professional, or citizen—with a sense of surrender and offering, rather than being driven by anxiety, ego, or fear of outcomes. This is based on the Bhagavad Gita’s teaching of Nishkama Karma (selfless action). It provides the inner stability needed to engage with the world’s problems more effectively and compassionately, without being overwhelmed by them.
Q2: How can this concept apply to someone who is not religious or doesn’t believe in a personal God?
A2: The core principle is universal. “Taking shelter” can be reinterpreted as connecting to a higher consciousness, the universe, a profound sense of love, or the fundamental ground of being. The key is shifting one’s sense of security from fragile external things (money, status, relationships) to something internal and constant. Practices like mindfulness, meditation, and spending time in nature can facilitate this connection without requiring traditional religious belief. The goal is to find that inner “anchor” that provides peace irrespective of circumstances.
Q3: The article says worldly things only provide momentary happiness. Does that mean we shouldn’t pursue goals or enjoy life?
A3: Not at all. The message is not to reject the world but to enjoy it without becoming dependent on it for our ultimate happiness. We can fully pursue goals, build wealth, and cherish relationships, but we do so with a sense of detachment—understanding that these are beautiful parts of the journey, but not the destination itself. This mindset actually allows for greater enjoyment because it removes the anxiety of potential loss. We can appreciate a beautiful meal without believing it will satisfy our deepest hunger forever.
Q4: What does it practically mean to “take shelter” on a daily basis?
A4: It means cultivating a consistent practice that connects you to your chosen concept of the Divine or inner peace. This could include:
-
Prayer or Meditation: Starting the day with a few minutes of silent contemplation or prayer to set intention.
-
Mindful Remembrance: Consciously pausing at various points in the day to recenter and remember your “anchor.”
-
Devotional Reading: Reading spiritual texts or philosophy to reinforce the mindset.
-
Offering Actions: Mentally dedicating your daily tasks to a higher purpose, transforming mundane activities into acts of devotion.
It’s the daily effort to return the restless “bird” of the mind to its resting place.
Q5: How does this idea address the very real problems of societal injustice and suffering? Doesn’t it encourage passivity?
A5: A truly anchored individual is not passive but is empowered to act with greater clarity and compassion. When action is born from a place of inner peace and connection to a higher love (e.g., seeing the divine in others), it is less likely to be fueled by anger, hatred, or ego, which often perpetuate cycles of violence and injustice. History shows that some of the most effective agents of social change, like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., were deeply rooted in their spiritual practice, which provided them with the resilience and moral fortitude to fight prolonged battles against injustice without burning out or succumbing to bitterness. Their shelter was their source of strength for action.
