India Gini Illusion, The Hidden Truth Behind Equality Rankings
Why in News?
Recently, India was ranked among the most equal societies globally by the Gini Index, placing it in the ‘moderately low’ inequality category with a score of 25. This score may appear to be a reason for celebration, suggesting equitable income distribution. However, this ranking has been widely criticized for not representing the complex, lived experiences of inequality within Indian society. Critics argue that the methodology behind the Gini Index fails to accurately reflect realities across different dimensions such as gender, digital access, informal employment, education, and social inequality.
Introduction
The Gini Index, widely used to measure income inequality within a country, ranked India favourably with a score of 25, positioning it among the most equal societies in the world. However, this classification paints a misleading picture of the country’s socio-economic landscape. In reality, India is a nation deeply marked by disparities in wealth, education, digital access, gender representation, and employment patterns—many of which are not adequately captured by traditional statistical tools like the Gini Index.
This article critically examines the limitations of the Gini Index in evaluating inequality in India, particularly highlighting the multiple realms—such as gender, digital divide, education, and informal employment—where deep-rooted disparities still exist.
Key Issues
1. Misleading Representation of Income Equality
While India’s Gini Index score suggests low income inequality, it does not reflect the day-to-day struggles and disparities experienced by the majority of Indians. For example, visible inequality is apparent in urban areas where a chauffeur earning ₹30,000 per month supports a family, while driving a luxury car owned by someone whose monthly income is over ₹5 lakh. This stark contrast in earnings and lifestyle is common but often masked by national averages.
The Gini Index aggregates data, often from household consumption surveys, and fails to capture the real disparities that exist at the extreme ends of income distribution—especially the unaccounted wealth of the richest or the suppressed earnings of the poor in informal sectors.
2. Informal Employment and Shadow Economies
Over 90% of India’s labour force is in the informal sector, where accurate income data is hard to collect. These workers—daily wage labourers, gig economy workers, agricultural labourers—earn inconsistent and often meagre wages. Their earnings are typically underreported or entirely excluded from household income surveys that feed into the Gini Index.
Moreover, self-employed people, such as small shopkeepers or domestic workers, may understate income for various reasons—fear of taxation, lack of documentation, or irregular earning patterns. As a result, the index might inaccurately depict the economic condition of millions.
3. Gender Inequality in the Workforce
India continues to lag behind in gender parity in economic participation. Female labour force participation has been consistently low and even declining over the years. According to the World Bank, only about 20% of Indian women are actively employed or seeking work, compared to over 70% for men.
This exclusion of women from formal and well-paying jobs is a significant inequality indicator. The Gini Index does not factor in gender disparities in income, unpaid domestic labour, or access to economic opportunities. As a result, a large segment of gender-based inequality goes unaccounted for.
4. Digital Divide and Unequal Access
The digital divide is another serious concern in India’s journey toward equality. Internet and smartphone access, essential for education, banking, governance, and employment in today’s world, remains uneven across rural-urban areas and socio-economic classes.
According to NFHS-5, in 2019-21, only 33% of women in rural areas had access to mobile internet, compared to 58% of men in urban areas. These gaps restrict access to information, job opportunities, education, and financial independence. Yet, none of these dimensions are covered under the Gini-based measurement of inequality.
5. Educational Disparity and Learning Inequality
India has made significant progress in expanding school enrollment. However, quality education and learning outcomes remain highly unequal. A student from a private English-medium urban school has better learning outcomes, infrastructure, and career opportunities compared to one from a government school in a rural village.
The Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) consistently shows poor learning outcomes among rural children, despite high enrollment. These disparities are not captured by income alone and are ignored by the Gini Index.
6. Caste and Social Discrimination
India’s social structure is deeply influenced by caste-based hierarchies, which affect access to land, education, jobs, and social capital. Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) still face discrimination in employment, housing, education, and policing.
Social inequality, reinforced by centuries of caste exclusion, cannot be understood through income-centric indices like Gini. Structural disadvantages and systemic exclusions are not quantifiable through such metrics but are core to understanding India’s inequality.
Alternative Approaches
To get a clearer picture of inequality, India must embrace multi-dimensional indicators. Some alternatives include:
-
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI): Takes into account health, education, and standard of living.
-
Gender Inequality Index (GII): Measures gender-based disparities in reproductive health, empowerment, and labour market participation.
-
Palma Ratio: Focuses on the ratio of income of the richest 10% to the poorest 40%, providing a sharper view of extreme inequality.
-
Wealth Inequality Surveys: Include real estate, gold, inheritance, and informal income sources.
Challenges and the Way Forward
1. Poor Data Collection Infrastructure
One of the biggest challenges is data invisibility—a vast portion of economic activity in India happens outside formal structures. Improved data collection, particularly in informal sectors, is crucial.
2. Need for Gender-Inclusive Economic Policies
Unless there is focused effort on enhancing female labour participation and addressing the unpaid care economy, India’s growth story will remain exclusionary.
3. Digital Empowerment for All
Bridging the digital divide should be treated as a national priority. Public infrastructure and affordable internet access are critical for inclusive development.
4. Education Reform
Investment in school infrastructure, teacher training, and curriculum reform must aim to reduce the learning gap between private and public institutions.
5. Targeted Welfare and Affirmative Action
Affirmative action policies for historically disadvantaged groups, such as Dalits and Adivasis, must be implemented more rigorously and updated to suit changing socio-economic contexts.
Conclusion
The Gini Index may offer a statistical snapshot, but it does not reflect the lived inequalities of India’s population. From gender and caste to education and digital access, disparities are embedded deep within the nation’s fabric. While India’s rank may look optimistic on paper, ground realities tell a different story—one that requires better tools, deeper insights, and more inclusive policy action.
Inequality is not just a number. It is a complex, multifaceted issue that calls for multi-dimensional measurement, inclusive policymaking, and a nuanced understanding beyond averages and aggregates.
Five Important Questions and Answers
Q1. What does the Gini Index measure?
A1. The Gini Index measures income inequality within a population, with 0 representing perfect equality and 100 indicating maximum inequality.
Q2. Why is India’s Gini score considered misleading?
A2. Because it fails to capture informal sector income, gender disparities, digital divide, and social inequalities, presenting an overly simplistic view of equality.
Q3. What are the major inequalities in India that the Gini Index overlooks?
A3. Gender employment gaps, informal work, digital access inequality, educational disparities, and caste-based social exclusion.
Q4. What alternatives can better measure inequality in India?
A4. Multidimensional Poverty Index, Gender Inequality Index, Palma Ratio, and comprehensive wealth surveys.
Q5. What steps are needed to reduce inequality in India?
A5. Better data collection, gender-inclusive policies, bridging the digital divide, education reforms, and focused social justice initiatives.
