A Paradigm Shift in Indian Finance, How the RBI’s Nod for M&A Funding Reshapes the Corporate Lending Landscape
In a move that signals a significant evolution in India’s financial regulatory philosophy, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has announced a landmark decision to permit domestic banks to fund acquisitions made by Indian non-financial companies. This policy shift, part of a broader set of 22 measures aimed at boosting credit flow and promoting ease of doing business, has the potential to fundamentally alter the dynamics of corporate lending, spur merger and acquisition (M&A) activity, and redefine the competitive landscape of acquisition financing in the country. For decades, a conservative approach kept banks on the sidelines of this high-stakes domain, but this liberalization, cautiously welcomed by the banking sector, could unlock a multi-billion dollar opportunity while introducing a new set of risks and complexities that the system must now learn to navigate.
Unshackling the Banks: The End of a Long-Standing Restriction
Historically, the RBI maintained a prudent, if restrictive, stance by prohibiting banks from lending for mergers and acquisitions. The underlying rationale was rooted in a deep-seated caution against potential financial instability. M&A financing, particularly when used for leveraged buyouts, can lead to excessive corporate leverage, creating fragile balance sheets vulnerable to economic downturns. Furthermore, such lending often occurs at the holding company level, one step removed from the tangible, income-generating assets of the operating company. This “promoter-level funding” was viewed with skepticism, as it does not directly contribute to fresh capital formation or asset creation—the traditional cornerstones of productive bank credit. The fear was that bank funds, backed by public deposits, could be channeled into speculative, equity-market-driven activities, potentially inflating asset bubbles rather than fueling real economic growth.
This conservative policy, however, had an unintended consequence: it created a vast vacuum in the acquisition financing market. As Indian corporates grew in ambition and scale, seeking to consolidate market share, acquire technology, or enter new geographies through M&A, they were forced to look beyond the domestic banking system. This demand was eagerly met by a trio of alternative financiers: foreign banks with global expertise in structured finance, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) offering more flexible lending mandates, and an increasingly assertive cohort of private credit funds. These players, unencumbered by the same regulatory constraints as Indian banks, stepped in to dominate the market, but at a cost. Their capital, often more expensive and with shorter tenures, increased the overall cost of acquisitions for Indian companies.
The RBI’s decision, announced by Governor Sanjay Malhotra, is a recognition of this market reality and a response to the banking sector’s long-standing demand for a level playing field. It comes at a critical juncture when the share of bank credit to large corporates has seen a significant decline. Corporates have increasingly turned to domestic and international debt capital markets, as well as equity issuances, to meet their capital expenditure (capex) needs, leading to a disintermediation of the banking system and a slowdown in overall corporate credit growth. By allowing banks to enter this space, the RBI is not just unlocking a new business line for lenders; it is actively attempting to reinvigorate bank-led corporate credit and reintegrate banks into the core strategic financial decisions of India’s leading companies.
The Ripple Effects: Reshaping Markets and Spurring Activity
The implications of this regulatory shift are profound and multi-faceted, extending far beyond the balance sheets of banks.
1. A Competitive Jolt to the Acquisition Financing Market:
The most immediate impact will be a fierce competition for market share. Domestic banks possess a powerful advantage: a lower cost of funds, derived from their extensive deposit base. This allows them to potentially offer acquisition loans at more competitive interest rates than NBFCs, private credit funds, or foreign banks. A senior banker from a state-owned bank aptly captured this sentiment, questioning why banks should be excluded from a multi-billion dollar opportunity that others are capitalizing on at higher costs to corporates. This price competition could ultimately make M&A activities more affordable and accessible for a broader range of Indian companies, not just the largest conglomerates.
2. A Potential Catalyst for an M&A Boom:
By injecting a large, relatively inexpensive source of capital into the market, the RBI’s move is poised to significantly spur M&A activity. As Kanchan Jain of Ascertis Credit notes, “It will spur M&A activity. It will create collaboration between various types of participants.” This is a crucial point. The future of acquisition financing may not be a zero-sum game but one of collaboration. Private credit funds bring sophisticated structuring expertise for complex deals, while banks can provide the bulk of the senior debt capital. This syndication model allows each player to leverage its core strengths, leading to more efficient and robust financing solutions for large-scale acquisitions.
3. The Revival of Corporate Credit Demand:
After a prolonged period of muted demand, this policy opens a fresh avenue for credit growth. Madan Sabnavis, Chief Economist at Bank of Baroda, highlights that credit growth to large manufacturing remains muted at 1.8%, while medium-scale industry credit grows at a healthier 13.1%. The M&A arena, predominantly involving medium to large companies, represents a direct channel to boost these numbers. An RBI research report itself has pegged the potential credit growth from this decision at a staggering $1.2 trillion, underscoring the scale of the opportunity. While some bankers express caution, citing global economic uncertainty, the sheer potential of this new credit bucket is undeniable.
Navigating the New Frontier: Risks, Capabilities, and the Regulatory Fine Print
Despite the optimism, the journey into acquisition financing is fraught with challenges that banks must overcome.
1. The Imperative of Risk Management and Guardrails:
The very reasons that initially justified the ban on M&A lending have not disappeared. The RBI is acutely aware of the risks of over-leverage and speculative bubbles. Consequently, the final guidelines, yet to be released, are expected to be laden with prudent restrictions. Experts like Kanchan Jain anticipate limits based on a bank’s net worth or Tier-1 capital, ensuring that exposures remain manageable. There will likely be strict eligibility criteria, potentially restricting such financing to listed entities with transparent governance and excluding the volatile financial sector. The RBI’s objective, as Jain puts it, is to prevent “bank funding going in for speculator activity” and avoid creating a “stock market bubble.”
2. The Expertise Gap and the Path to Skill Development:
For decades, the specialized skill set required for underwriting acquisition debt—evaluating deal synergies, assessing post-merger integration risks, and structuring layered debt—resided outside domestic banks. This is a significant capability gap. However, bankers are confident they can bridge it swiftly. The state-owned banker quoted in the report believes that while “most of the banks may have to do some primer on acquisition finance,” the core competency of understanding corporate risk is already in place. Banks already have deep relationships with and have conducted extensive risk assessments of the very corporates that will now seek acquisition loans. The learning curve will involve understanding the “specifics of the acquisition part,” a challenge that can be met through targeted training and, initially, through collaborations with more experienced players.
3. A Phased Rollout and Sectoral Prudence:
The rollout of this new lending vertical will be cautious and methodical. Banks are unlikely to “start jumping into it” immediately. The first step will be to await the RBI’s final guidelines, after which each bank will need to create its own internal policies, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and underwriting frameworks for such transactions. Initially, it is expected that banks will focus on sectors they are already comfortable with and with corporates that are existing, credit-worthy clients. This phased approach mirrors the development of infrastructure financing, where a few large banks developed specialized expertise and smaller banks followed by taking smaller, syndicated exposures.
Conclusion: A Bold Step into a New Financial Era
The RBI’s decision to allow banks to fund acquisitions is more than a mere regulatory tweak; it is a strategic recalibration of the role of domestic banks in India’s maturing economy. It acknowledges that for Indian companies to compete globally, they need access to versatile and competitive financing tools for strategic growth, and that domestic banks, as the primary custodians of national savings, should be central to providing them.
This move has the potential to create a virtuous cycle: cheaper bank capital fuels more M&A, leading to industry consolidation, improved corporate efficiencies, and ultimately, stronger, more globally competitive Indian enterprises. This, in turn, can drive economic growth and create a more dynamic corporate landscape. However, this promising future is contingent upon a successful balancing act. The RBI must craft guidelines that are enabling yet prudent, preventing the recklessness of over-leverage. Simultaneously, banks must invest in building robust risk management frameworks and developing the specialized expertise needed to navigate this complex field. If managed wisely, this policy could mark the beginning of a new, more sophisticated chapter in Indian corporate finance, empowering both lenders and borrowers in an increasingly complex global economy.
Q&A: Understanding the RBI’s Move on Bank Funding for Acquisitions
1. Why did the RBI previously prohibit banks from funding mergers and acquisitions (M&A)?
The RBI’s historical restriction was based on prudential risk management. The central bank was concerned that M&A financing could lead to several negative outcomes:
-
Over-leverage: Companies could take on excessive debt to fund acquisitions, making their balance sheets risky and vulnerable to economic shocks.
-
Unproductive Lending: Such funds often go to the holding company level for acquiring equity stakes, not directly toward creating new physical assets or generating immediate productive capacity (like building a new factory would).
-
Speculation: There was a risk that bank funds, backed by public deposits, could fuel speculative bubbles in the stock market rather than supporting tangible economic growth.
2. What advantage do domestic banks have over private credit funds and NBFCs in this new market?
Domestic banks have one decisive advantage: a lower cost of funds. Banks fund their lending primarily through public deposits, which are a cheaper source of capital compared to the funds that NBFCs or private credit funds raise from the markets or institutions. This allows banks to potentially offer acquisition loans at more competitive interest rates, making them an attractive alternative for corporates and enabling banks to capture a significant share of the market.
3. How could this decision potentially boost overall corporate credit demand in India?
Corporate credit growth, especially to large industries, has been muted as companies have turned to bond markets and equity for funding. This decision opens up an entirely new category of lending for banks. By financing acquisitions—a activity prevalent among medium and large companies—banks can directly tap into a fresh source of demand. The RBI’s own research estimates this could unlock potential credit growth of $1.2 trillion, providing a substantial boost to bank loan books.
4. What are the potential risks, and how might the RBI mitigate them in its final guidelines?
The primary risks remain over-leverage and speculative lending. To mitigate these, the RBI’s final guidelines are expected to include strict guardrails, such as:
-
Exposure Limits: Capping how much a bank can lend for M&A as a percentage of its capital.
-
Eligibility Criteria: Possibly restricting loans to listed, financially stable companies and excluding the financial sector.
-
Purpose Restrictions: Ensuring funding is for strategic acquisitions and not for purely speculative trading of shares.
5. Do Indian banks currently have the expertise to underwrite complex acquisition financing deals?
Currently, there is an expertise gap, as this was a prohibited activity for decades. However, bankers are confident they can develop the necessary skills quickly. They already possess a deep understanding of the corporate clients who will be seeking these loans. The specialized knowledge of deal structuring and post-merger risk assessment can be acquired through training and by initially collaborating with more experienced players like foreign banks or private credit funds. The rollout is expected to be gradual as banks build their internal policies and risk frameworks.
