Trump vs BRICS, A New Frontline in Global Geopolitics

Trump vs BRICS, A New Frontline in Global Geopolitics

Why in News

Former US President Donald Trump’s recent statements and actions against BRICS have reignited debates on global order, economic alliances, and the future of US hegemony. Trump has openly criticized BRICS, calling it a threat to the current international system dominated by the United States. With BRICS gaining momentum through new membership, discussions of alternative currencies, and the potential to create an order independent of the West, Trump’s opposition highlights the growing contest between Western powers and emerging economies.

Introduction

The global order that emerged after World War II has been primarily led by the West, with the United States as the undisputed hegemon. Institutions such as the IMF, World Bank, NATO, and later the WTO shaped the rules of the international system under Western dominance. However, over the past two decades, the balance of power has started to shift. Emerging economies, led by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS), have increasingly sought to challenge Western dominance by pushing for multipolarity.

Donald Trump, during his presidency, and even more so after, has repeatedly targeted BRICS, dismissing it as a meaningless acronym while warning that its rise poses dangers to US-led global hegemony. His tariffs, sanctions, and public criticism reflect a broader strategy to weaken any collective effort that could rival America’s influence.

This conflict represents more than just economic disagreements; it reflects a deeper battle about whose rules will define the 21st-century world order.

Key Issues and Background

1. Trump’s Mercurial Foreign Policy
   Trump’s approach to foreign policy has always been unpredictable. Much like the boy Calvin from the comic strip Calvin and Hobbes, who sees danger where others see play, Trump has repeatedly treated economic partners as rivals. He imposed harsh tariffs on China, Brazil, India, and even NATO allies, citing America’s “unfair treatment.” BRICS became a convenient target in this narrative, representing a potential coalition that could undercut US economic supremacy.

2. Tariffs and Trade Wars

   • India faced a 50% tariff on certain exports under Trump’s administration.

   • Brazil, China, and South Africa were threatened with similar punitive measures.

   • Trump justified these tariffs as protecting the US economy, but critics argued they weakened global trade stability.

3. Geopolitical Contest with China and Russia
   Trump’s strongest opposition to BRICS stems from its two most powerful members: China and Russia.

   • China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and push for de-dollarization directly challenge the US-led financial order.

   • Russia, isolated after the Ukraine conflict, increasingly looks to BRICS as a platform to counter Western sanctions.

4. BRICS and Alternative Currency
   One of the most controversial ideas within BRICS is the creation of an alternative currency system to reduce reliance on the US dollar. Some have proposed a “BRICS unit” backed by gold or other assets. While still in its early stages, the very discussion alarms Washington, as dollar dominance underpins America’s geopolitical power.

5. Historical Context of Dollar Hegemony
   After World War II, the Bretton Woods system established the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Even after the gold standard collapsed in the 1970s, the dollar’s supremacy continued, supported by US military power and control of global financial institutions. Any attempt by BRICS to weaken this dominance is therefore seen by Washington as an existential threat.

Specific Impacts or Effects

1. Impact on India

   • India finds itself in a delicate position. While part of BRICS, it also maintains close ties with the US through defense and technology partnerships. Trump’s tariffs on Indian goods strained ties, but New Delhi continues to balance between Washington and BRICS partners.

   • Analysts argue that India’s strategic autonomy will be tested if BRICS moves aggressively towards de-dollarization.

2. Impact on Global Trade

   • Trump’s tariffs disrupted supply chains and raised prices for American consumers.

   • BRICS, if it continues expanding (with possible inclusion of Saudi Arabia, Iran, and others), could create parallel trade networks less dependent on the US.

3. Impact on Geopolitics

   • Trump’s rhetoric against BRICS has only reinforced its members’ belief in the need for alternatives.

   • Europe, meanwhile, is split—while dependent on US security guarantees, it also sees potential in engaging with BRICS economies.

4. Impact on US Domestic Politics

   • Trump’s hardline stance appeals to his voter base, which believes globalization has harmed American workers.

   • However, many economists warn that his policies could isolate the US and accelerate the decline of dollar dominance.

Challenges and the Way Forward

1. For BRICS

   • Internal differences: China and India remain rivals despite being BRICS partners. Brazil and South Africa are cautious about aligning too strongly against the West.

   • Currency issues: Creating a viable alternative to the dollar requires decades of coordination, political trust, and robust financial infrastructure.

2. For the US

   • Washington must adapt to a multipolar world where economic power is more distributed.

   • Over-reliance on sanctions and tariffs may push more countries toward BRICS.

3. For the Global Order

   • The risk of fragmentation is high. If BRICS and the West pursue parallel systems, global governance could become more chaotic.

   • However, competition might also drive reforms in global institutions, making them more inclusive.

Conclusion

The clash between Trump and BRICS symbolizes the transition from a US-dominated world order to a multipolar one. While BRICS is not yet a fully unified bloc, its growing influence and calls for de-dollarization represent a serious challenge to American hegemony.

Trump’s aggressive stance has drawn attention to the weaknesses of the current global system but has also accelerated the very trends he fears. The coming decade will determine whether BRICS can translate its vision into reality—or whether internal divisions will prevent it from becoming a true counterweight to the West.

Either way, the era of unquestioned US supremacy is ending, and the future will likely be shaped by negotiation, rivalry, and adaptation among multiple power centers.

5 Questions and Answers

Q1. Why is Donald Trump targeting BRICS?
A1. Trump views BRICS as a threat to US global dominance. He believes the bloc seeks to undermine the dollar’s supremacy and create a new world order without Western leadership.

Q2. What role does the US dollar play in this conflict?
A2. The dollar has been the world’s reserve currency since World War II, giving the US enormous influence. BRICS’s discussions about creating an alternative currency directly challenge this dominance.

Q3. How does India fit into this debate?
A3. India is a member of BRICS but also a close US partner. It must balance its commitment to BRICS with its strategic and economic ties to Washington.

Q4. What are the main challenges for BRICS in creating an alternative system?
A4. Internal political rivalries, economic disparities, and lack of unified financial infrastructure make it difficult for BRICS to quickly establish a credible alternative to the dollar.

Q5. What does this conflict mean for the future of the world order?
A5. It signals a shift towards multipolarity. While BRICS may not replace the West, it is likely to push for a more balanced system where emerging economies have a stronger voice.